Jose Luis López-Campos 1 , 2 , Maria Abad Arranz 1 , Carmen Calero-Acuña 1 , 2 , Fernando Romero-Valero 3 , Ruth Ayerbe-García 4 , Antonio Hidalgo-Molina 3 , Ricardo I Aguilar-Pérez-Grovas 4 , Francisco García-Gil 5 , Francisco Casas-Maldonado 6 , Laura Caballero-Ballesteros 5 , María Sánchez-Palop 6 , Dolores Pérez-Tejero 7 , Alejandro Segado Soriano 7 , Jose Calvo-Bonachera 8 , Bárbara Hernández-Sierra 8 , Adolfo Doménech 9 , Macarena Arroyo-Varela 9 , Francisco González-Vargas 10 , Juan J Cruz-Rueda 10
03 March 2017
Clinical practice in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be influenced by weather variability throughout the year. To explore the hypothesis of seasonal variability in clinical practice, the present study analyzes the results of the 2013–2014 Andalusian COPD audit with regard to changes in clinical practice according to the different seasons.
The Andalusian COPD audit was a pilot clinical project conducted from October 2013 to September 2014 in outpatient respiratory clinics of hospitals in Andalusia, Spain (8 provinces with more than 8 million inhabitants) with retrospective data gathering. For the present analysis, astronomical seasons in the Northern Hemisphere were used as reference. Bivariate associations between the different COPD guidelines and the clinical practice changes over the seasons were explored by using binomial multivariate logistic regression analysis with age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, type of hospital, and COPD severity by forced expiratory volume in 1 second as covariates, and were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
The Andalusian COPD audit included 621 clinical records from 9 hospitals. After adjusting for covariates, only inhaler device satisfaction evaluation was found to significantly differ according to the seasons with an increase in winter (OR, 3.460; 95% CI, 1.469–8.151), spring (OR, 4.215; 95% CI, 1.814–9.793), and summer (OR, 3.371; 95% CI, 1.391–8.169) compared to that in autumn. The rest of the observed differences were not significant after adjusting for covariates. However, compliance with evaluating inhaler satisfaction was low.
The various aspects of clinical practice for COPD care were found to be quite homogeneous throughout the year for the variables evaluated. Inhaler satisfaction evaluation, however, presented some significant variation during the year. Inhaler device satisfaction should be evaluated during all clinical visits throughout the year for improved COPD management.