There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Activity scheduling is a behavioral treatment of depression in which patients learn
to monitor their mood and daily activities, and how to increase the number of pleasant
activities and to increase positive interactions with their environment. We conducted
a meta-analysis of randomized effect studies of activity scheduling. Sixteen studies
with 780 subjects were included. The pooled effect size indicating the difference
between intervention and control conditions at post-test was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.60 -
1.15). This is a large effect. Heterogeneity was low in all analyses. The comparisons
with other psychological treatments at post-test resulted in a non-significant pooled
effect size of 0.13 in favor of activity scheduling. In ten studies activity scheduling
was compared to cognitive therapy, and the pooled effect size indicating the difference
between these two types of treatment was 0.02. The changes from post-test to follow-up
for activity scheduling were non-significant, indicating that the benefits of the
treatments were retained at follow-up. The differences between activity scheduling
and cognitive therapy at follow-up were also non-significant. Activity scheduling
is an attractive treatment for depression, not only because it is relatively uncomplicated,
time-efficient and does not require complex skills from patients or therapist, but
also because this meta-analysis found clear indications that it is effective.