On 31 July 2022, the International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) bid farewell
to Professor Eskild Petersen,[
Figure 1
] after his decade as its Editor-in-Chief. Professor Petersen has guided IJID through
transition to full open access publishing in 2013, and in the last two years, steered
the journal through the “stormy” period of the COVID-19 pandemic. One notable impact
of the pandemic was the unprecedented increase of journal publications in all scientific
subjects especially in infectious diseases.(Else 2020) Between 2020 and mid-2022,
over a million articles on COVID-19 have been published internationally (https://reports.dimensions.ai/covid-19).
For IJID it has meant a three-fold increase in submissions compared to before the
pandemic. It has been extremely challenging to sift through the huge number of submissions
to select high quality publications on COVID-19 for the assimilation of readers amid
the pandemic. This has gone on smoothly at IJID, which has continued its role for
disseminating new knowledge relating to and arising from the pandemic especially among
under-resourced countries. During the pandemic, young academics from the ISID (International
Society for Infectious Diseases) Emerging Leaders programme were brought into the
editorial team to facilitate capacity-building and international networking in the
infectious diseases field. The pandemic also witnessed the launch of IJID Regions,
a sister journal for enhancing the visibility of regional infectious diseases research
especially from under-resourced settings.(Lee et al., 2021) IJID's impact factor has
gone up from 2.35 in 2012 to 12.07 in 2021 and is now ranked within the first quartile
of Infectious Diseases journals.
Figure 1
Professor Eskild Petersen at work
Figure 1:
Professor Petersen of Aarhus University, Denmark, is the longest serving Editor-in-Chief
of IJID, since its inception in 1996. He has been instrumental in the process of bringing
each author's research to scientific publication. Editors like Professor Petersen
are curators of scholarship.(Franco et al., 2018) The technical tasks of handling
submitted manuscripts, coordinating reviews, and managing a repository of data for
the scientific community are the essential components of journal publishing.(Marcovitch
2008) As a curator, Professor Petersen has applied these editing skills to translate
the research submitted to the journal for the intellectual consumption of readers,
which for IJID means practitioners and academics in infectious diseases in both clinical
and public health fields. When we reflect on editorship, Professor Petersen's contributions
are testimony to the importance of “human-ware” in medical publishing, which cannot
be replaced by the ever-expanding application of automated editing software and hardware
even in this era of open access publishing.
Deciding on “what to publish” is unarguably the most important skill of an Editor-in-Chief.
The decision of which research gets published depends on the evaluation of a range
of factors. Foremost, does the work fall within the scope of the journal (https://www.ijidonline.com/content/aims)?
IJID is a clinical infectious diseases journal which implies that experimental work,
animal studies, secondary data analyses without clinical context are not going to
be published. Is there novelty in the research work? Unlike basic science research
for which novelty is normally easier to define, infectious diseases’ novelty can be
observational, methodological, related to the timeliness of the reporting of an epidemic,
or derived from interventions which may differ by setting. As the official publication
of the ISID, IJID has from inception had an emphasis on conditions that are common
in under-resourced countries. Diversity is naturally a consideration, which is defined
by the setting where the research has been conducted.[
Figure 2
] The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the mushrooming of research in all aspects of SARS-CoV-2
infections. A balance is needed in the publication of infectious diseases research
so that COVID-19 research is published in a timely fashion to guide clinical and public
health decision making while at the same time not excluding research on other infectious
diseases which have not gone away despite the pandemic. While reviewers can assess
the quality of a particular submission and advise on its improvement, a decision on
‘publishability’ is made by the Editor-in-Chief as an act of curating scholarship.
Figure 2
Geographic distribution of published COVID-19 and non COVID-19 manuscripts in International
Journal of Infectious Diseases in 2020 and 2021 by country affiliation of corresponding
authors.
Figure 2:
In the past, almost all manuscripts landing on the desk of an Editor-in-Chief were
sent for peer review. Academic writing in those days typically belonged to a much
smaller sphere of elite scholars well defined by their professional discipline. This
can't be done today, not just because of the sheer volume of research being generated
today but also partly because the number of willing reviewers is extremely limited,
more so during the pandemic where almost every infectious diseases physician, public
health practitioner and microbiologist has been at the forefront of the pandemic response.
Online submission is so easy that some authors choose to submit even when the manuscript
is not quite ready, or when they have not checked carefully if their work is suited
for a particular journal. In the life cycle of each manuscript, the first 72 hours
or so after its receipt is the most critical for rejection of manuscripts not suited
for the journal to be made, or else submissions accumulate exponentially. Computer-screening
by algorithms may fail as these incoming drafts are difficult to code accurately.
Hiring helpers to do screening may lead to inconsistency of output. If screening out
ineligible work is a tedious task, then selecting eligible submissions for publication
is an even bigger challenge. In addition to identifying suitable peer reviewers, a
final decision cannot be made without considering not just novelty of the research,
but the potential impacts on the scientific knowledge generated and implications for
the scientific community and the society as a whole.
Speed cannot be neglected as an important attribute of good editorship. By speed,
we do not mean the actual number of hours or days for processing a manuscript, which
could be the mechanistic part of any automated editorial management systems. Good
scientific findings should be published as soon as possible. Manuscripts not suitable
for a journal should be returned to their authors instantaneously so that a new home
can be identified by its authors without delay. Reviewing should be conducted in time.
Reviewers should be identified by their interest and expertise so that no time is
wasted in asking for the input of inappropriate reviewers. Reviewers’ time is important
especially during outbreaks, and having a large network of willing reviewers is one
sure way of increasing speed.(IJID, 2022) Completed reviews should be attended to
quickly by editors for decision-making as regards ‘publishability’. The deadlines
are set as the minimum, not the best standard. Speed cannot be increased mechanistically
but rather as a result of a strong understanding of the subject, mastery of latest
advances and appreciation of the amount of time required for each step. A knowledgeable
and open-minded Editor-in-Chief working in consultation with his/her team of editors
can increase the speed of the editing process, as shown by Professor Petersen who
has been able to keep the processing time low over the last 10 years.
As a scholarly platform a journal cannot function like an empty book-shelf waiting
for new additions. Perspective articles and editorials are and should be curated or
written by the editors. Professor Petersen never shied away from making a comment
on the scientific findings presented in the journal. These ranged from criticism on
control measures, advocacy for improvement in public health intervention, and appeal
for attention to an issue in infectious disease. Jerome Kassirer, then Editor-in-Chief
of the New England Journal of Medicine in 1999, on discussing editorial independence,
asserted that journals should have a voice and a personality.(Kassirer 1999) In similar
vein, Roger Colliers summed up the attributes of a perfect Editor-in-Chief, as “No
favour, no friends”.(Collier 2011) Professor Petersen has driven a number of important
position statements published in IJID that have spoken with the voice of the society
on critical issues in global infectious diseases. [
Table 1
]
Table 1
Selected list of editorials published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases
between 2019 and 2022
Table 1
DATE
TITLE
CONTEXT / CIRCUMSTANCE
12 Mar 2019
Dengue in India: Towards a better understanding of priorities and progress
Supplement on Dengue in India
3 Apr 2019
“Clean care for all — It's in your hands”: The May 5th, 2019 WHO SAVE LIVES: Clean
Your Hands campaign
WHO SAVE LIVES: Clean Your Hands campaign
2 May 2019
Is the global measles resurgence a “public health emergency of international concern”?
Measles resurgence
11 Jun 2019
Macro-efforts for the micro-elimination of hepatitis C targeting people who inject
drugs
Word Hepatitis Day
19 Jun 2019
Ebola in the DRC one year later – Boiling the frog?
Ebola in Democratic Republic of Congo, one year on
14 Aug 2019
First series of position papers, with a focus on implementing infection prevention
and control measures in low- and middle-income settings
Launching of IJID position paper series
14 Jan 2020
The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health —
The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China
Emergence of COVID-119
4 Mar 2020
Commemorating World TB Day 2020: “IT'S TIME” — It's time to End the Global TB Epidemic
World TB Day
3 Mar 2020
Li Wenliang, a face to the frontline healthcare worker. The first doctor to notify
the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2, (COVID-19), outbreak
Death of whistle-blower on Feb 7, 2020
18 May 2020
Sustained and continuous funding for WHO
US withdrew funding for the World Health Organization (WHO).
20 Apr 2020
The voice of nurses in hospital epidemiology and infection control: An example from
the 19th century
International Nurses Day
19 Jan 2021
COVID-19 vaccines under the International Health Regulations – We must use the WHO
International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis
COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorisation
29 Apr 2021
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 should be included in childhood vaccination programs
Continuing COVID-19 threat
28 Apr 2021
World Meningitis Day and the World Health Organization's roadmap to defeat bacterial
meningitis in the COVID-19 pandemic era
World Meningitis Day
2 Jun 2021
Mandatory immunization against SARS-CoV-2 of athletes, companions and supporters for
the Tokyo Olympics
Tokyo Olympic
27 Jul 2021
Group B Streptococcus awareness month: vaccine and challenges underway
Group B Streptococcus awareness month:
6 Sep2021
Field Epidemiology Training Programs to accelerate public health workforce development
and global health security
first World Field Epidemiology Day
1 Dec 2021
Emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) - highlights Africa's
research capabilities, but exposes major knowledge gaps, inequities of vaccine distribution,
inadequacies in global COVID-19 response and control efforts
Emergence of Omicron
4 Mar 2022
The show is not over – wild-type polio in Malawi is a wake-up call and an opportunity
for elimination efforts
Polio in Malawi
18 Mar 2022
World Tuberculosis Day 2021 Theme — ‘The Clock is Ticking’ — and the world is running
out of time to deliver the United Nations General Assembly commitments to End TB due
to the COVID-19 pandemic
World TB Day
In today's internet-based, automated and data-driven editorial process, the position
of the Editor-in-Chief may have become increasingly marginalised. For some mega-journals,
(Collier 2011) editorship has been replaced by robotic technology or artificial intelligence
not unlike driverless vehicles, with technical staff playing a supporting role in
protecting and maintaining the engines. We agree with Jerome Kassirer who argued that
an Editor-in-Chief, as one who “..must aspire to impartiality, open-mindedness, and
intellectual honesty, must try to select material for its merit, interest to readers,
and originality alone”.(Dinis-Oliveira 2022) These are, we believe the same qualities
Professor Petersen held, who has truly managed IJID as a powerhouse for curating scholarship
in clinical and public health infectious diseases.
We wish Professor Petersen well and record our gratitude.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Ngai-Sze Wong for creating the map (Figure 2)
References
Collier R. No favour, no friends: parsing the qualifications for a journal's editor-in-chief.
CMAJ 2011;183(4):415-6. Doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3785.
Dinis-Oliveira RJ. Open-access mega-journals in health and life Sciences: what every
researcher needs to know about this publishing model. Curr Drug Res Rev 2022;14(1):3-5.
Doi: 10.2174/2589977514666220209101713.
Else H. How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing – in seven charts.
Nature 2020;588(7839):553. Doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03564-y.
Franco EL, Shinder GA, Tota JE, Volesky K, Isidean SD. Journal editors as curators
of scholarship: A case study in repairing the scientific record. Prev Med 2018;110:114-115.
Doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.027.
International Journal of Infectious Diseases. Thank you to reviewers. Int J Infect
Dis 2022;114:ii-xiii doi: 10.1016/S1201-9712(21)01226-1
Kassirer JP. Editorial independence. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1671-1672 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905273402109
Lee SS, Blumberg L, Kramer L, Al-Abri S, Obeiro C, Pinto TC, Yapi R, Abubakar AA,
Petersen E. The roots of infectious disease science [Editorial]. IJID Regions 2021;1:170-171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2021.12.004
Marcovitch H. What medical journal editing means to me. In: Medicine, Mental Health,
Science, Religion, and Well-being (A.R. Singh and S.A. Singh eds.). Mens Sana Monogr
2008;6:237-243.