11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanistic insights into the evolution of DUF26-containing proteins in land plants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Large protein families are a prominent feature of plant genomes and their size variation is a key element for adaptation. However, gene and genome duplications pose difficulties for functional characterization and translational research. Here we infer the evolutionary history of the DOMAIN OF UNKNOWN FUNCTION (DUF) 26-containing proteins. The DUF26 emerged in secreted proteins. Domain duplications and rearrangements led to the appearance of CYSTEINE-RICH RECEPTOR-LIKE PROTEIN KINASES (CRKs) and PLASMODESMATA-LOCALIZED PROTEINS (PDLPs). The DUF26 is land plant-specific but structural analyses of PDLP ectodomains revealed strong similarity to fungal lectins and thus may constitute a group of plant carbohydrate-binding proteins. CRKs expanded through tandem duplications and preferential retention of duplicates following whole genome duplications, whereas PDLPs evolved according to the dosage balance hypothesis. We propose that new gene families mainly expand through small-scale duplications, while fractionation and genetic drift after whole genome multiplications drive families towards dosage balance.

          Abstract

          Aleksia Vaattovaara et al. investigate the evolutionary history of a representative protein family, the DUF26-containing proteins, which is specific to land plants. They suggest that domain duplications and rearrangement led to the protein family’s two main subclasses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla.

          The analysis of the first plant genomes provided unexpected evidence for genome duplication events in species that had previously been considered as true diploids on the basis of their genetics. These polyploidization events may have had important consequences in plant evolution, in particular for species radiation and adaptation and for the modulation of functional capacities. Here we report a high-quality draft of the genome sequence of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) obtained from a highly homozygous genotype. The draft sequence of the grapevine genome is the fourth one produced so far for flowering plants, the second for a woody species and the first for a fruit crop (cultivated for both fruit and beverage). Grapevine was selected because of its important place in the cultural heritage of humanity beginning during the Neolithic period. Several large expansions of gene families with roles in aromatic features are observed. The grapevine genome has not undergone recent genome duplication, thus enabling the discovery of ancestral traits and features of the genetic organization of flowering plants. This analysis reveals the contribution of three ancestral genomes to the grapevine haploid content. This ancestral arrangement is common to many dicotyledonous plants but is absent from the genome of rice, which is a monocotyledon. Furthermore, we explain the chronology of previously described whole-genome duplication events in the evolution of flowering plants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants

            W Kabsch (1993)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms of change in gene copy number.

              Deletions and duplications of chromosomal segments (copy number variants, CNVs) are a major source of variation between individual humans and are an underlying factor in human evolution and in many diseases, including mental illness, developmental disorders and cancer. CNVs form at a faster rate than other types of mutation, and seem to do so by similar mechanisms in bacteria, yeast and humans. Here we review current models of the mechanisms that cause copy number variation. Non-homologous end-joining mechanisms are well known, but recent models focus on perturbation of DNA replication and replication of non-contiguous DNA segments. For example, cellular stress might induce repair of broken replication forks to switch from high-fidelity homologous recombination to non-homologous repair, thus promoting copy number change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jarkko@ntu.edu.sg
                michael.wrzaczek@helsinki.fi
                Journal
                Commun Biol
                Commun Biol
                Communications Biology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2399-3642
                8 February 2019
                8 February 2019
                2019
                : 2
                : 56
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0410 2071, GRID grid.7737.4, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Viikki Plant Science Centre, VIPS, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, , University of Helsinki, ; Viikinkaari 1 (POB65), FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 4988, GRID grid.8591.5, Structural Plant Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany and Plant Biology, , University of Geneva, ; Geneva, Switzerland
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0410 2071, GRID grid.7737.4, Institute of Biotechnology, , University of Helsinki, ; Viikinkaari 5 (POB56), FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2224 0361, GRID grid.59025.3b, School of Biological Sciences, , Nanyang Technological University, ; 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore, 637551 Singapore
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000122191520, GRID grid.7112.5, Present Address: Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, Institute of Biophysics AS CR, v.v.i. and CEITEC—Central European Institute of Technology, , Mendel University in Brno, ; Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3452-0947
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-8760
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-3578
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-0626
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4948-423X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8959-1809
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-6611
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-5698
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4096-6278
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-9060
                Article
                306
                10.1038/s42003-019-0306-9
                6368629
                30775457
                dcddd759-9d7c-4b06-af2f-38a84f96e35c
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 12 December 2018
                : 14 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003125, Suomen Kulttuurirahasto (Finnish Cultural Foundation);
                Funded by: Doctoral Programme in Plant Sciences, Helsinki University (AV)
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004410, European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO);
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001711, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation);
                Award ID: 31003A_176237
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002341, Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia);
                Award ID: 275632
                Award ID: 283139
                Award ID: 312498
                Award ID: 271832
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100007797, Helsingin Yliopisto (University of Helsinki);
                Funded by: EMBO long-term fellowship (BB)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Comments

                Comment on this article