57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent progress in paleontological methods for dating the Tree of Life

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dating the Tree of Life (TOL) has become a major goal of biological research. Beyond the intrinsic interest of reconstructing the history of taxonomic diversification, time-calibrated trees (timetrees for short, as used throughout below) are required in many types of comparative analyses, where branch lengths are used to assess the conservation importance of lineages, correlation between characters, or to assess phylogenetic niche conservatism, among other uses. Improvements in dating the TOL would thus benefit large segments of the biological community, ranging from conservation biology and ecology through functional biology and paleontology. Recently, progress has been made on several fronts: in compiling databases and supertrees incorporating paleontological data, in computing confidence intervals on the true stratigraphic range of taxa, and in using birth-and-death processes to assess the probability distribution of the time of origin of specified taxa. Combined paleontological and molecular dating has also progressed through the insertion of extinct taxa into data matrices, which allows incorporation of their phylogenetic uncertainty into the dating analysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The delayed rise of present-day mammals.

          Did the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event, by eliminating non-avian dinosaurs and most of the existing fauna, trigger the evolutionary radiation of present-day mammals? Here we construct, date and analyse a species-level phylogeny of nearly all extant Mammalia to bring a new perspective to this question. Our analyses of how extant lineages accumulated through time show that net per-lineage diversification rates barely changed across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Instead, these rates spiked significantly with the origins of the currently recognized placental superorders and orders approximately 93 million years ago, before falling and remaining low until accelerating again throughout the Eocene and Oligocene epochs. Our results show that the phylogenetic 'fuses' leading to the explosion of extant placental orders are not only very much longer than suspected previously, but also challenge the hypothesis that the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event had a major, direct influence on the diversification of today's mammals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species.

            Ecologists are increasingly adopting an evolutionary perspective, and in recent years, the idea that closely related species are ecologically similar has become widespread. In this regard, phylogenetic signal must be distinguished from phylogenetic niche conservatism. Phylogenetic niche conservatism results when closely related species are more ecologically similar that would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships; its occurrence suggests that some process is constraining divergence among closely related species. In contrast, phylogenetic signal refers to the situation in which ecological similarity between species is related to phylogenetic relatedness; this is the expected outcome of Brownian motion divergence and thus is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for the existence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Although many workers consider phylogenetic niche conservatism to be common, a review of case studies indicates that ecological and phylogenetic similarities often are not related. Consequently, ecologists should not assume that phylogenetic niche conservatism exists, but rather should empirically examine the extent to which it occurs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life.

              The role of fossils in dating the tree of life has been misunderstood. Fossils can provide good "minimum" age estimates for branches in the tree, but "maximum" constraints on those ages are poorer. Current debates about which are the "best" fossil dates for calibration move to consideration of the most appropriate constraints on the ages of tree nodes. Because fossil-based dates are constraints, and because molecular evolution is not perfectly clock-like, analysts should use more rather than fewer dates, but there has to be a balance between many genes and few dates versus many dates and few genes. We provide "hard" minimum and "soft" maximum age constraints for 30 divergences among key genome model organisms; these should contribute to better understanding of the dating of the animal tree of life.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Gene.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1664-8021
                13 July 2012
                2012
                : 3
                : 130
                Affiliations
                simpleUMR 7207, CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Earth History Department, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alex Pyron, The George Washington University, USA

                Reviewed by: Michael S. Lee, South Australian Museum, Australia Alex Pyron, The George Washington University, USA Chris Organ, Harvard University, USA

                *Correspondence: Michel Laurin, UMR 7207, CNRS/MNHN/UPMC, Earth History Department, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 43 rue Buffon, CP 48, 75005 Paris, France. e-mail: michel.laurin@ 123456upmc.fr

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Evolutionary and Population Genetics, a specialty of Frontiers in Genetics.

                Article
                10.3389/fgene.2012.00130
                3395881
                22811696
                dcf4363f-2b86-4c8a-b713-b2faed77745e
                Copyright ©Laurin.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 17 March 2012
                : 24 June 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, Equations: 5, References: 125, Pages: 16, Words: 0
                Categories
                Genetics
                Review Article

                Genetics
                molecular dating,stratigraphic range,fossil record,phylogenetics,confidence intervals,molecular clock,paleontological dating

                Comments

                Comment on this article