5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Applicability, safety, and biological activity of regulatory T cell therapy in liver transplantation

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 2 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 2
      American Journal of Transplantation
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      cellular transplantation (nonislet), immunosuppression/immune modulation, liver transplantation/hepatology, T cell biology, tolerance, translational research/science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a lymphocyte subset with intrinsic immunosuppressive properties that can be expanded in large numbers ex vivo and have been shown to prevent allograft rejection and promote tolerance in animal models. To investigate the safety, applicability, and biological activity of autologous Treg adoptive transfer in humans, we conducted an open‐label, dose‐escalation, Phase I clinical trial in liver transplantation. Patients were enrolled while awaiting liver transplantation or 6‐12 months posttransplant. Circulating Tregs were isolated from blood or leukapheresis, expanded under good manufacturing practices (GMP) conditions, and administered intravenously at either 0.5‐1 million Tregs/kg or 3‐4.5 million Tregs/kg. The primary endpoint was the rate of dose‐ limiting toxicities occurring within 4 weeks of infusion. The applicability of the clinical protocol was poor unless patient recruitment was deferred until 6‐12 months posttransplant. Thus, only 3 of the 17 patients who consented while awaiting liver transplantation were dosed. In contrast, all six patients who consented 6‐12 months posttransplant received the cell infusion. Treg transfer was safe, transiently increased the pool of circulating Tregs and reduced anti‐donor T cell responses. Our study opens the door to employing Treg immunotherapy to facilitate the reduction or complete discontinuation of immunosuppression following liver transplantation.

          Abstract

          CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells isolated from either patients awaiting liver transplantation or recently transplanted recipients can be expanded in large numbers ex vivo and safely infused into recipients on immunosuppression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Extracting a Cellular Hierarchy from High-dimensional Cytometry Data with SPADE

          Multiparametric single-cell analysis is critical for understanding cellular heterogeneity. Despite recent technological advances in single-cell measurements, methods for analyzing high-dimensional single-cell data are often subjective, labor intensive and require prior knowledge of the biological system under investigation. To objectively uncover cellular heterogeneity from single-cell measurements, we present a novel computational approach, Spanning-tree Progression Analysis of Density-normalized Events (SPADE). We applied SPADE to cytometry data of mouse and human bone marrow. In both cases, SPADE organized cells in a hierarchy of related phenotypes that partially recapitulated well-described patterns of hematopoiesis. In addition, SPADE produced a map of intracellular signal activation across the landscape of human hematopoietic development. SPADE revealed a functionally distinct cell population, natural killer (NK) cells, without using any NK-specific parameters. SPADE is a versatile method that facilitates the analysis of cellular heterogeneity, the identification of cell types, and comparison of functional markers in response to perturbations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Web-based analysis and publication of flow cytometry experiments.

            Cytobank is a Web-based application for storage, analysis, and sharing of flow cytometry experiments. Researchers use a Web browser to log in and use a wide range of tools developed for basic and advanced flow cytometry. In addition to providing access to standard cytometry tools from any computer, Cytobank creates a platform and community for developing new analysis and publication tools. Figure layouts created on Cytobank are designed to allow transparent access to the underlying experiment annotation and data processing steps. Since all flow cytometry files and analysis data are stored on a central server, experiments and figures can be viewed or edited by anyone with the proper permission, from any computer with Internet access. Once a primary researcher has performed the initial analysis of the data, collaborators can engage in experiment analysis and make their own figure layouts using the gated, compensated experiment files. Cytobank is available to the scientific community at http://www.cytobank.org. (c) 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Standardization of whole blood immune phenotype monitoring for clinical trials: panels and methods from the ONE study

              Background Immune monitoring by flow cytometry is a fast and highly informative way of studying the effects of novel therapeutics aimed at reducing transplant rejection or treating autoimmune diseases. The ONE Study consortium has recently initiated a series of clinical trials aimed at using different cell therapies to promote tolerance to renal allografts. To compare the effectiveness of different cell therapies, the consortium developed a robust immune monitoring strategy, including procedures for whole blood (WB) leukocyte subset profiling by flow cytometry. Methods Six leukocyte profiling panels computing 7- to 9-surface marker antigens for monitoring the major leukocyte subsets as well as characteristics of T cell, B cell, and dendritic cell (DC) subsets were designed. The precision and variability of these panels were estimated. The assay was standardized within eight international laboratories using Flow-Set Pro beads for mean fluorescence intensity target definition and the flow cytometer setup procedure. Standardization was demonstrated by performing inter-site comparisons. Results Optimized methods for sample collection, storage, preparation, and analysis were established, including protocols for gating target subsets. WB specimen age testing demonstrated that staining must be performed within 4 hours of sample collection to keep variability low, meaning less than or equal to 10% for the majority of defined leukocyte subsets. Inter-site comparisons between all participating centers testing shipped normal WB revealed good precision, with a variability of 0.05% to 30% between sites. Intra-assay analyses revealed a variability of 0.05% to 20% for the majority of subpopulations. This was dependent on the frequency of the particular subset, with smaller subsets showing higher variability. The intra-assay variability performance defined limits of quantitation (LoQ) for subsets, which will be the basis for assessing statistically significant differences achieved by the different cell therapies. Conclusions Local performance and central analysis of the ONE Study flow cytometry panel yields acceptable variability in a standardized assay at multiple international sites. These panels and procedures with WB allow unmanipulated analysis of changes in absolute cell numbers of leukocyte subsets in single- or multicenter clinical trials. Accordingly, we propose the ONE Study panel may be adopted as a standardized method for monitoring patients in clinical trials enrolling transplant patients, particularly trials of novel tolerance promoting therapies, to facilitate fair and meaningful comparisons between trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sanchez_fueyo@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Am J Transplant
                Am. J. Transplant
                10.1111/(ISSN)1600-6143
                AJT
                American Journal of Transplantation
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1600-6135
                1600-6143
                03 February 2020
                April 2020
                : 20
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/ajt.v20.4 )
                : 1125-1136
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Liver Studies MRC Centre for Transplantation Department of Inflammation Biology Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine King's College London London UK
                [ 2 ] MRC Centre for Transplantation Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine King's College London London UK
                [ 3 ] Hepatology Research Group Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry Southwest Liver Unit Derriford Hospital Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust Plymouth UK
                [ 4 ] NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London London UK
                [ 5 ] School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences King's College London London UK
                [ 6 ] Systems Cancer Immunology Lab Comprehensive Cancer Centre King’s College London, & Haematology Department Guy’s Hospital London UK
                [ 7 ] Biostatistics Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK
                [ 8 ] Bioinformatic Platform Biomedical Research Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD) Instituto de Salud Carlos III Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Alberto Sánchez‐Fueyo

                Email: sanchez_fueyo@ 123456kcl.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-3504
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-5754
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6089-5828
                Article
                AJT15700
                10.1111/ajt.15700
                7154724
                31715056
                dcfd1567-df41-48fb-9ba7-8696af5043a1
                © 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 October 2019
                : 29 October 2019
                : 04 November 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 12, Words: 7321
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000265;
                Funded by: Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation
                Award ID: J006742/1
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
                Funded by: St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust
                Funded by: King's College London
                Categories
                Original Article
                ORIGINAL ARTICLES
                Clinical Science
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.0 mode:remove_FC converted:14.04.2020

                Transplantation
                cellular transplantation (nonislet),immunosuppression/immune modulation,liver transplantation/hepatology,t cell biology,tolerance,translational research/science

                Comments

                Comment on this article