4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Democrats and Republicans choose solar panels in very similar ways

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Appealing to individuals’ social identity is a powerful form of social influence, capable of changing the way people process information, the information they think about, and how they evaluate other individuals. The purpose of this study is to explore the idea that Democrat and Republican environmental norms may impact the attributes and strategies partisans use when choosing whether to have solar panels on a house.

          Methods

          An online study with N = 363 participants was conducted to examine these possible effects through multi-attribute decision making, applying predefined decision process models to participant behavior to test which attribute-based models best describe participants’ decision making. A choice task was combined with an experimental manipulation of political affiliation salience to examine whether the norms of political groups would have influence on decision behavior.

          Results

          Results of the study show remarkable similarities between political parties in their strategies for choosing solar panels. Members of both political parties appeared to use similar strategies and similar attributes for the formation of their decisions.

          Discussion

          Recommendations are made that science communicators and policy makers avoid polarizing language so as not to create unnecessary polarization where ideological gaps may not currently exist.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

          Venkatesh, Thong, Xu (2012)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Social influence: compliance and conformity.

            This review covers recent developments in the social influence literature, focusing primarily on compliance and conformity research published between 1997 and 2002. The principles and processes underlying a target's susceptibility to outside influences are considered in light of three goals fundamental to rewarding human functioning. Specifically, targets are motivated to form accurate perceptions of reality and react accordingly, to develop and preserve meaningful social relationships, and to maintain a favorable self-concept. Consistent with the current movement in compliance and conformity research, this review emphasizes the ways in which these goals interact with external forces to engender social influence processes that are subtle, indirect, and outside of awareness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification.

              Recent research shows individuals' identification with in-groups to be psychologically important and socially consequential. However, there is little agreement about how identification should be conceptualized or measured. On the basis of previous work, the authors identified 5 specific components of in-group identification and offered a hierarchical 2-dimensional model within which these components are organized. Studies 1 and 2 used confirmatory factor analysis to validate the proposed model of self-definition (individual self-stereotyping, in-group homogeneity) and self-investment (solidarity, satisfaction, and centrality) dimensions, across 3 different group identities. Studies 3 and 4 demonstrated the construct validity of the 5 components by examining their (concurrent) correlations with established measures of in-group identification. Studies 5-7 demonstrated the predictive and discriminant validity of the 5 components by examining their (prospective) prediction of individuals' orientation to, and emotions about, real intergroup relations. Together, these studies illustrate the conceptual and empirical value of a hierarchical multicomponent model of in-group identification.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2691837/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/597043/overviewRole: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                16 October 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1403647
                Affiliations
                Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Pedro Ponce, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESM), Mexico

                Reviewed by: Juana Isabel Méndez, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESM), Mexico

                Maura Pilotti, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University, Saudi Arabia

                *Correspondence: Nathanael Johnson, john2370@ 123456purdue.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403647
                11521948
                39478795
                dd1b4e5a-b575-46e6-8bcd-7ec65814aedd
                Copyright © 2024 Johnson and Reimer.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 March 2024
                : 04 October 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 87, Pages: 13, Words: 11794
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation to TR (#2331940).
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Environmental Psychology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                social identity,solar panels,technology adoption,multi-attribute decision modeling,political identity

                Comments

                Comment on this article