53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The classic account of the load theory (LT) of attention suggests that increasing cognitive load leads to greater processing of task-irrelevant stimuli due to competition for limited executive resource that reduces the ability to actively maintain current processing priorities. Studies testing this hypothesis have yielded widely divergent outcomes. The inconsistent results may, in part, be related to variability in executive capacity (EC) and task difficulty across subjects in different studies. Here, we used a cross-modal paradigm to investigate whether augmented working memory (WM) load leads to increased early distracter processing, and controlled for the potential confounders of EC and task difficulty. Twenty-three young subjects were engaged in a primary visual WM task, under high and low load conditions, while instructed to ignore irrelevant auditory stimuli. Demands of the high load condition were individually titrated to make task difficulty comparable across subjects with differing EC. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to measure neural activity in response to stimuli presented in both the task relevant modality (visual) and task-irrelevant modality (auditory). Behavioral results indicate that the load manipulation and titration procedure of the primary visual task were successful. ERPs demonstrated that in response to visual target stimuli, there was a load-related increase in the posterior slow wave, an index of sustained attention and effort. Importantly, under high load, there was a decrease of the auditory N1 in response to distracters, a marker of early auditory processing. These results suggest that increased WM load is associated with enhanced attentional engagement and protection from distraction in a cross-modal setting, even after controlling for task difficulty and EC. Our findings challenge the classic LT and offer support for alternative models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies

          I present an account of the origins and development of the multicomponent approach to working memory, making a distinction between the overall theoretical framework, which has remained relatively stable, and the attempts to build more specific models within this framework. I follow this with a brief discussion of alternative models and their relationship to the framework. I conclude with speculations on further developments and a comment on the value of attempting to apply models and theories beyond the laboratory studies on which they are typically based.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                03 August 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 380
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Center for Brain/Mind Medicine – Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
                [2] 2Old Age Research Group (PROTER), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine São Paulo, Brazil
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford MA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Tetsuo Kida, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Japan

                Reviewed by: Daniel Schneider, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (LG), Germany; Keita Kamijo, Waseda University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Kirk R. Daffner, kdaffner@ 123456partners.org
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2016.00380
                4971070
                27536226
                dd277c29-eb29-4123-a3eb-3235cfcb3c82
                Copyright © 2016 Simon, Tusch, Holcomb and Daffner.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 May 2016
                : 13 July 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 86, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging 10.13039/100000049
                Award ID: R01AG017935
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                load theory,executive capacity,erps,selective attention,working memory
                Neurosciences
                load theory, executive capacity, erps, selective attention, working memory

                Comments

                Comment on this article