21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The mechanisms leading to patient/ventilator asynchrony has never been systematically assessed. We studied the possible association between asynchrony and respiratory mechanics in patients ready to be enrolled for a home non-invasive ventilatory program. Secondarily, we looked for possible differences in the amount of asynchronies between obstructive and restrictive patients and a possible role of asynchrony in influencing the tolerance of non-invasive ventilation (NIV).

          Methods

          The respiratory pattern and mechanics of 69 consecutive patients with chronic respiratory failure were recorded during spontaneous breathing. After that patients underwent non-invasive ventilation for 60 minutes with a "dedicated" NIV platform in a pressure support mode during the day. In the last 15 minutes of this period, asynchrony events were detected and classified as ineffective effort (IE), double triggering (DT) and auto-triggering (AT).

          Results

          The overall number of asynchronies was not influenced by any variable of respiratory mechanics or by the underlying pathologies (that is, obstructive vs restrictive patients). There was a high prevalence of asynchrony events (58% of patients). IEs were the most frequent asynchronous events (45% of patients) and were associated with a higher level of pressure support. A high incidence of asynchrony events and IE were associated with a poor tolerance of NIV.

          Conclusions

          Our study suggests that in non-invasively ventilated patients for a chronic respiratory failure, the incidence of patient-ventilator asynchronies was relatively high, but did not correlate with any parameters of respiratory mechanics or underlying disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation.

          The incidence, pathophysiology, and consequences of patient-ventilator asynchrony are poorly known. We assessed the incidence of patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation and we identified associated factors. Sixty-two consecutive patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h were included prospectively as soon as they triggered all ventilator breaths: assist-control ventilation (ACV) in 11 and pressure-support ventilation (PSV) in 51. Gross asynchrony detected visually on 30-min recordings of flow and airway pressure was quantified using an asynchrony index. Fifteen patients (24%) had an asynchrony index greater than 10% of respiratory efforts. Ineffective triggering and double-triggering were the two main asynchrony patterns. Asynchrony existed during both ACV and PSV, with a median number of episodes per patient of 72 (range 13-215) vs. 16 (4-47) in 30 min, respectively (p=0.04). Double-triggering was more common during ACV than during PSV, but no difference was found for ineffective triggering. Ineffective triggering was associated with a less sensitive inspiratory trigger, higher level of pressure support (15 cmH(2)O, IQR 12-16, vs. 17.5, IQR 16-20), higher tidal volume, and higher pH. A high incidence of asynchrony was also associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (7.5 days, IQR 3-20, vs. 25.5, IQR 9.5-42.5). One-fourth of patients exhibit a high incidence of asynchrony during assisted ventilation. Such a high incidence is associated with a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. Patients with frequent ineffective triggering may receive excessive levels of ventilatory support.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique.

            The validity of the conventional esophageal balloon technique as a measure of pleural pressure was tested in 10 subjects in sitting, supine, and lateral positions by occluding the airways at end-expiration and measuring the ratio of changes in esophageal (delta Pes) and mouth pressure (delta Pm) during the ensuing spontaneous occluded inspiratory efforts. Similar measurements were also made during static Mueller maneuvers. In both tests, delta Pes/delta Pm values were close to unity in sitting and lateral positions, whereas in the supine position, substantial deviations from unity were found in some instances. However, by repositioning the balloon to different levels in the esophagus, even in these instances a locus could be found where the delta Pes/delta Pm ratio was close to unity. No appreciable phase difference between delta Pes and delta Pm was found. We conclude that by positioning the balloon according to the "occlusion test" procedure, valid measurements of pleural pressure can be obtained in all the tested body positions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patterns of home mechanical ventilation use in Europe: results from the Eurovent survey.

              The study was designed to assess the patterns of use of home mechanical ventilation (HMV) for patients with chronic respiratory failure across Europe. A detailed questionnaire of centre details, HMV user characteristics and equipment choices was sent to carefully identified HMV centres in 16 European countries. A total of 483 centres treating 27,118 HMV users were identified. Of these, 329 centres completed surveys between July 2001 and June 2002, representing up to 21,526 HMV users and a response rate of between 62% and 79%. The estimated prevalence of HMV in Europe was 6.6 per 100,000 people. The variation in prevalence between countries was only partially related to the median year of starting HMV services. In addition, there were marked differences between countries in the relative proportions of lung and neuromuscular patients using HMV, and the use of tracheostomies in lung and neuromuscular HMV users. Lung users were linked to a HMV duration of or =6 yrs. In conclusion, wide variations exist in the patterns of home mechanical ventilation provision throughout Europe. Further work is needed to monitor its use and ensure equality of provision and access.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                2013
                25 March 2013
                : 17
                : 2
                : R54
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Maugeri, Via Maugeri 10, Pavia, 27100, Italy
                [2 ]Respiratory and Critical Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Pietro Albertoni 15, Bologna, 40138, Italy
                [3 ]Laboratorio di Informatica e Sistemica per la Ricerca Clinica, IRCCS Fondazione S. Maugeri, Via Maugeri 10, Pavia, 27100, Italy
                [4 ]Alma Mater University Department of Clinical, Integrated and Experimental Medicine (DIMAS), Respiratory and Critical Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Pietro Albertoni 15, Bologna, 40138, Italy
                Article
                cc12580
                10.1186/cc12580
                3672543
                23531269
                dd52d46d-79d4-4cbe-a716-b00dc4d9f148
                Copyright ©2013 Carlucci et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 October 2012
                : 13 February 2013
                : 18 March 2013
                Categories
                Research

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article