9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Importancia, definición y conflictos de la autoría en publicaciones científicas Translated title: Importance, definition and conflicts of authorship in scientific publications Translated title: Importância, definição e conflitos da autoria em publicações científicas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Definir la autoría en artículos y documentos científicos es un proceso esencial y complejo, que encierra subjetividad y depende de convenios establecidos en general de palabra, lo que puede ocasionar conflictos entre los investigadores. Se han publicado algunas guías con lineamientos generales para mejorar esta práctica, sin embargo son pocos los procedimientos cuantitativos para precisar autoría y coautoría de un escrito científico, y no hay consenso para definir los autores y el orden en que deben aparecer. Con este artículo intentamos rescatar algunos criterios y consideraciones para determinar el listado de autores en textos científicos.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Defining authorship in scientific articles and documents is an essential and complex process that involves subjectivity and depends on largely informal agreements, which may cause conflict among researchers. Although some guidelines have been published to improve this practice, there are few quantitative procedures in the literature to specify authorship and co-authorship of a scientific paper, and there is no consensus on the definition of authors and the order in which they should be listed. With this article we try to review a few criteria and considerations for determining author lists in scientific articles.

          Translated abstract

          Resumo Definir a autoria de artigos e documentos científicos é um processo essencial e complexo, que envolve subjetividade e depende de acordos quase sempre informais, o que pode causar conflitos entre pesquisadores. Algumas diretrizes foram publicadas para aperfeiçoar esta prática, mas ainda são poucos os procedimentos quantitativos para estabelecer a autoria e a coautoria de textos científicos, e não há consenso para definir os autores e a ordem em que devem aparecer. Com este artigo, visamos recapitular alguns critérios e considerações para determinar a ordem de autoria em artigos científicos.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews.

          To determine the prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews, how authorship is assigned, and the ways in which authors and Cochrane editorial teams contribute. Using a Web-based, self-administered survey, corresponding authors for 577 reviews published in issues 1 and 2 from 1999 of The Cochrane Library were invited to report on the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors, contributions by authors listed in the byline and members of Cochrane editorial teams, and identification of methods of assigning authorship. Responses were received for 362 reviews (63% response rate), which contained 913 authors. One hundred forty-one reviews (39%) had evidence of honorary authors, 32 (9%) had evidence of ghost authors (most commonly a member of the Cochrane editorial team), and 9 (2%) had evidence of both honorary and ghost authors. The editorial teams contributed in a wide variety of ways to 301 reviews (83%). Authorship was decided by the group of authors (31%) or lead author (25%) in most reviews. Authorship order was assigned according to contribution in most reviews (76%). The 3 functions contributed to most by those listed in the byline were assessing the quality of included studies (83%), interpreting data (82%), and abstracting data from included studies (77%). A substantial proportion of reviews had evidence of honorary and ghost authorship. The Cochrane editorial teams contributed to most Cochrane reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                bioet
                Revista Bioética
                Rev. Bioét.
                Conselho Federal de Medicina (Brasília, DF, Brazil )
                1983-8042
                1983-8034
                March 2020
                : 28
                : 1
                : 10-16
                Affiliations
                [1] Bogotá Arauca orgnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia orgdiv1Dirección de Investigación en Salud Pública orgdiv2Equipo Banco de Proyectos Colombia
                [2] Bogotá Arauca orgnameUniversidad Nacional de Colombia orgdiv1Dirección Observatorio Nacional de Salud Colombia
                Article
                S1983-80422020000100010 S1983-8042(20)02800100010
                10.1590/1983-80422020281361
                dd54f7c9-58ef-4ba5-9b9e-d6de7e33ad7f

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 23 October 2018
                : 23 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 33, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Actualización

                Authorship,Research Personnel,Authorship-Ethics,Journal article,Autoria,Pesquisadores,Autoria-Ética,Artigo de revista,Investigadores,Artículo de revista

                Comments

                Comment on this article