61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevention and treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: an update

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SAKI) remains an important challenge in critical care medicine. We reviewed current available evidence on prevention and treatment of SAKI with focus on some recent advances and developments. Prevention of SAKI starts with early and ample fluid resuscitation preferentially with crystalloid solutions. Balanced crystalloids have no proven superior benefit. Renal function can be evaluated by measuring lactate clearance rate, renal Doppler, or central venous oxygenation monitoring. Assuring sufficiently high central venous oxygenation most optimally prevents SAKI, especially in the post-operative setting, whereas lactate clearance better assesses mortality risk when SAKI is present. Although the adverse effects of an excessive “kidney afterload” are increasingly recognized, there is actually no consensus regarding an optimal central venous pressure. Noradrenaline is the vasopressor of choice for preventing SAKI. Intra-abdominal hypertension, a potent trigger of AKI in post-operative and trauma patients, should not be neglected in sepsis. Early renal replacement therapy (RRT) is recommended in fluid-overloaded patients’ refractory to diuretics but compelling evidence about its usefulness is still lacking. Continuous RRT (CRRT) is advocated, though not sustained by convincing data, as the preferred modality in hemodynamically unstable SAKI. Diuretics should be avoided in the absence of hypervolemia. Antimicrobial dosing during CRRT needs to be thoroughly reconsidered to assure adequate infection control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure.

          Immobilization and subsequent weakness are consequences of critical illness. Despite the theoretical advantages of physical therapy to address this problem, it has not been shown that physical therapy initiated in the intensive care unit offers benefit. Prospective cohort study in a university medical intensive care unit that assessed whether a mobility protocol increased the proportion of intensive care unit patients receiving physical therapy vs. usual care. Medical intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation on admission: Protocol, n = 165; Usual Care, n = 165. An intensive care unit Mobility Team (critical care nurse, nursing assistant, physical therapist) initiated the protocol within 48 hrs of mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving physical therapy in patients surviving to hospital discharge. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Outcome data are reflective of survivors. More Protocol patients received at least one physical therapy session than did Usual Care (80% vs. 47%, p < or = .001). Protocol patients were out of bed earlier (5 vs. 11 days, p < or = .001), had therapy initiated more frequently in the intensive care unit (91% vs. 13%, p < or = .001), and had similar low complication rates compared with Usual Care. For Protocol patients, intensive care unit length of stay was 5.5 vs. 6.9 days for Usual Care (p = .025); hospital length of stay for Protocol patients was 11.2 vs. 14.5 days for Usual Care (p = .006) (intensive care unit/hospital length of stay adjusted for body mass index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, vasopressor). There were no untoward events during an intensive care unit Mobility session and no cost difference (survivors + nonsurvivors) between the two arms, including Mobility Team costs. A Mobility Team using a mobility protocol initiated earlier physical therapy that was feasible, safe, did not increase costs, and was associated with decreased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay in survivors who received physical therapy during intensive care unit treatment compared with patients who received usual care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.).

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients.

              To determine whether early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients. Prospective cohort study. From June 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, we assessed safety and feasibility of early activity in all consecutive respiratory failure patients who required mechanical ventilation for >4 days admitted to our respiratory intensive care unit (RICU). A majority of patients were treated in another intensive care unit (ICU) before RICU admission. We excluded patients who required mechanical ventilation for 200 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure 200 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure 100 feet at RICU discharge. Early activity is a candidate therapy to prevent or treat the neuromuscular complications of critical illness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Patrick.Honore@az.vub.ac.be
                Rita.Jacobs@uzbrussel.be
                Inne.Hendrickx@uzbrussel.be
                Sean.Bagshaw@albertahealthservices.ca
                olivier.joannes-boyau@chu-bordeaux.fr
                wllm.br@gmail.com
                Elisabeth.Dewaele@uzbrussel.be
                Viola.Vangorp@uzbrussel.be
                Herbert.Spapen@uzbrussel.be
                Journal
                Ann Intensive Care
                Ann Intensive Care
                Annals of Intensive Care
                Springer Paris (Paris )
                2110-5820
                21 December 2015
                21 December 2015
                2015
                : 5
                : 51
                Affiliations
                [ ]Intensive Care Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
                [ ]Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
                [ ]Haut Leveque University Hospital of Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux 2, Pessac, France
                [ ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
                Article
                95
                10.1186/s13613-015-0095-3
                4686459
                26055186
                dd5c7903-46d1-4d9d-be73-d7110edabb76
                © Honore et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 16 July 2015
                : 1 December 2015
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                sepsis,acute kidney injury,septic acute kidney injury,prevention,treatment,review

                Comments

                Comment on this article