16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determinants of willingness to receive healthy lifestyle advice in the context of cancer screening

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Providing lifestyle advice at cancer screening may help reduce the cancer burden attributable to health-related behaviour. We examined determinants of willingness to receive advice about several behavioural cancer risk factors.

          Methods

          A population-based sample of English adults eligible for cancer screening ( n = 1221) completed items on willingness to receive lifestyle advice. Sociodemographic, psychological (risk perceptions, cancer risk factor awareness) and behavioural factors were used to predict interest in advice about diet, weight, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption.

          Results

          Two thirds (62–67%) reported interest in advice about diet, weight, and physical activity; 17% were willing to receive advice about smoking, and 32% about alcohol consumption. Willingness to receive advice was higher in those not adhering to guidelines for weight, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption (all p < 0.01). Non-White ethnicity was associated with interest in advice about diet, physical activity and smoking (all p < 0.01). Willingness to receive advice about diet, weight, physical activity and alcohol consumption increased with greater recognition of cancer risk factors (all p < 0.01).

          Conclusions

          Willingness to receive lifestyle advice at cancer screening was high, suggesting this context may provide an opportunity to support behaviour change. Increasing awareness of cancer risk factors may facilitate interest in lifestyle advice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C)An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review.

              Smoking prevalence is higher among disadvantaged groups, and disadvantaged smokers may face higher exposure to tobacco's harms. Uptake may also be higher among those with low socioeconomic status (SES), and quit attempts are less likely to be successful. Studies have suggested that this may be the result of reduced social support for quitting, low motivation to quit, stronger addiction to tobacco, increased likelihood of not completing courses of pharmacotherapy or behavioral support sessions, psychological differences such as lack of self-efficacy, and tobacco industry marketing. Evidence of interventions that work among lower socioeconomic groups is sparse. Raising the price of tobacco products appears to be the tobacco control intervention with the most potential to reduce health inequalities from tobacco. Targeted cessation programs and mass media interventions can also contribute to reducing inequalities. To tackle the high prevalence of smoking among disadvantaged groups, a combination of tobacco control measures is required, and these should be delivered in conjunction with wider attempts to address inequalities in health. © 2012 New York Academy of Sciences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +0113 343 3228 , R.Beeken@leeds.ac.uk
                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br. J. Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                11 July 2018
                17 July 2018
                : 119
                : 2
                : 251-257
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, , University College London, ; London, WC1E 6BT UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8403, GRID grid.9909.9, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, , University of Leeds, ; Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-9351
                Article
                160
                10.1038/s41416-018-0160-4
                6048170
                29991698
                dd99fb9f-310a-4fc3-8cb1-e6b642100370
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 19 January 2018
                : 31 May 2018
                : 4 June 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK (CRUK);
                Award ID: C416/A19488
                Award ID: C1418/A14134
                Award ID: C7492/A17219
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002653, Yorkshire Cancer Research;
                Award ID: L389SS
                Award ID: L389RB
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Cancer Research UK 2018

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article