1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A quantitative risk assessment of exposure to adventitious agents in a cell culture-derived subunit influenza vaccine

      research-article
      *
      Vaccine
      Elsevier Ltd.
      Influenza vaccine, MDCK cells, Viral safety

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A risk-assessment model has demonstrated the ability of a new cell culture-based vaccine manufacturing process to reduce the level of any adventitious agent to a million-fold below infectious levels. The cell culture-derived subunit influenza vaccine (OPTAFLU ®, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics) is produced using Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells to propagate seasonal viral strains, as an alternative to embryonated chicken-eggs. As only a limited range of mammalian viruses can grow in MDCK cells, similar to embryonated eggs, MDCK cells can act as an effective filter for a wide range of adventitious agents that might be introduced during vaccine production. However, the introduction of an alternative cell substrate (for example, MDCK cells) into a vaccine manufacturing process requires thorough investigations to assess the potential for adventitious agent risk in the final product, in the unlikely event that contamination should occur.

          The risk assessment takes into account the entire manufacturing process, from initial influenza virus isolation, through to blending of the trivalent subunit vaccine and worst-case residual titres for the final vaccine formulation have been calculated for >20 viruses or virus families. Maximum residual titres for all viruses tested were in the range of 10 −6 to 10 −16 infectious units per vaccine dose. Thus, the new cell culture-based vaccine manufacturing process can reduce any adventitious agent to a level that is unable to cause infection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inactivated influenza virus vaccines.

          K Nichol (2003)
          Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently available inactivated influenza virus vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Substantial health benefits are seen across all age and risk groups. Studies assessing the economic benefits of vaccination suggest that vaccination is highly cost effective and in many cases cost saving among the elderly. Influenza vaccination has also been associated with significant economic benefits in younger adults and children. Additional health economic studies from developing countries and from tropical/subtropical regions will be vitally important for better understanding of the global burden of influenza and potential benefits of vaccination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            In vitro growth profiles of respiratory syncytial virus in the presence of influenza virus.

            To elucidate epidemiological interference between respiratory syncytial (RSV) and influenza viruses, the influence of influenza A (HlN1) virus on the growth of RSV was examined. Although RSV grew in MDCK cells, coinfection with influenza A virus led to a reduction of progeny RSV. The degree of growth interference depended on the time of infection with influenza A virus post infection (p.i.) with RSV. In fact, infection with influenza A virus 12 hrs p.i. with RSV did not influence growth of the latter virus. On the contrary, growth suppression of influenza A virus by RSV was observed when the coinfection began at the later stages of RSV infection. Suppression of the growth of RSV by influenza A infection was further demonstrated at the level of viral protein synthesis. An indirect immunofluorescence (IF) test revealed that a large proportion of infected cells synthesized both RSV and influenza A virus antigens. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination demonstrated that influenza A and RSV virions possessing surface antigens specific for each virus were selectively released from dually infected cells. In the present study, we proved for the first time that the growth of RSV is blocked by competitive infection with influenza A virus in a susceptible cell population, competitive protein synthesis and selective budding of RSV and influenza viruses from the same infected cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Addressing immunization barriers, benefits, and risks.

              Vaccines have been highly effective in eliminating or significantly decreasing the occurrence of many once-common diseases. Barriers to immunization are a significant factor in the rising incidence rates of some vaccine-preventable diseases. Cost, reduced accessibility to immunizations, increasingly complex childhood and adolescent/adult immunization schedules, and increasing focus on the potential adverse effects of vaccines all contribute to difficulty in meeting the 2010 immunization goals. Physicians must not only be knowledgeable about vaccines but they must incorporate systems in their offices to record, remind, and recall patients for vaccinations. They must also clearly communicate vaccine benefits and risks while understanding those factors that affect an individual's acceptance and perception of those benefits and risks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                18 April 2008
                19 June 2008
                18 April 2008
                : 26
                : 26
                : 3332-3340
                Affiliations
                Novartis Behring, Emil von Behring Str. 76, D-35041 Marburg, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Tel.: +49 6421 39 22 65; fax: +49 6421 39 51 58. jens-peter.gregersen@ 123456novartis.com
                Article
                S0264-410X(08)00411-8
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.075
                7131715
                18485545
                ddbd702a-5743-42ca-9e08-31e4bde160be
                Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 10 December 2007
                : 27 March 2008
                : 31 March 2008
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                influenza vaccine,mdck cells,viral safety
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                influenza vaccine, mdck cells, viral safety

                Comments

                Comment on this article