19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Speaking clearly improves speech segmentation by statistical learning under optimal listening conditions

      ,
      Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
      Ubiquity Press, Ltd.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigated the effect of speaking style on speech segmentation by statistical learning under optimal and adverse listening conditions. Similar to the intelligibility and memory benefits found in previous studies, enhanced acoustic-phonetic cues of the listener-oriented clear speech could improve speech segmentation by statistical learning compared to conversational speech. Yet, it could not be precluded that hyper-articulated clear speech, reported to have less pervasive coarticulation, would result in worse segmentation than conversational speech. We tested these predictions using an artificial language learning paradigm. Listeners who acquired English before age six were played continuous repetitions of the ‘words’ of an artificial language, spoken either clearly or conversationally and presented either in quiet or in noise at a signal-to-noise ratio of +3 or 0 dB SPL. Next, they recognized the artificial words in a two-alternative forced-choice test. Results supported the prediction that clear speech facilitates segmentation by statistical learning more than conversational speech but only in the quiet listening condition. This suggests that listeners can use clear speech acoustic-phonetic enhancements to guide speech processing dependent on domain-general, signal-independent statistical computations. However, there was no clear speech benefit in noise at either signal-to-noise ratio. We discuss possible mechanisms that could explain these results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications

            Bayesian parameter estimation and Bayesian hypothesis testing present attractive alternatives to classical inference using confidence intervals and p values. In part I of this series we outline ten prominent advantages of the Bayesian approach. Many of these advantages translate to concrete opportunities for pragmatic researchers. For instance, Bayesian hypothesis testing allows researchers to quantify evidence and monitor its progression as data come in, without needing to know the intention with which the data were collected. We end by countering several objections to Bayesian hypothesis testing. Part II of this series discusses JASP, a free and open source software program that makes it easy to conduct Bayesian estimation and testing for a range of popular statistical scenarios (Wagenmakers et al. this issue).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
                Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
                1868-6354
                1868-6354
                January 25 2021
                July 23 2021
                : 12
                : 1
                : 14
                Article
                10.5334/labphon.310
                ddd04531-f152-4a79-a16f-3375d14c1626
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article