3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens: a subgroup analysis from a randomized clinical trial of response in subjects by cancer type

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group trial evaluating fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) found that a single-day, triple-antiemetic fosaprepitant regimen resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR; no vomiting or rescue medication use) in the delayed phase (25–120 h after chemotherapy initiation), compared with a 3-day control regimen ( ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01594749). As the risk for CINV is dependent on chemotherapy regimen and generally guided by tumor type, this post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of this regimen by cancer subpopulations (gastrointestinal [GI] or colorectal, lung, breast, and gynecologic cancers).

          Methods

          Subjects with confirmed cancer who were naive to highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC and MEC) and were scheduled to receive intravenous (IV) anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)–based MEC on the first day of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive oral ondansetron and oral dexamethasone plus either a single IV dose of fosaprepitant 150 mg (fosaprepitant regimen) or placebo (control regimen). The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects achieving CR in the delayed phase. CR rates in the overall and acute phases (0–120 h and 0–24 h after MEC initiation, respectively) were assessed as secondary end points. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

          Results

          CR rates in the delayed phase favored the fosaprepitant regimen over the control regimen across the GI/colorectal, lung, breast, and gynecologic cancer subgroups (range, 6.2–22%); similar findings were observed for CR in the overall phase. CR in the acute phase was high for all groups (≥87%). The fosaprepitant regimen was well tolerated in all cancer subgroups.

          Conclusions

          This post hoc analysis indicated that a single-day fosaprepitant regimen was effective in preventing CINV in patients receiving MEC, regardless of cancer type.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01594749, registered May 9, 2012.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

            To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline for antiemetics in oncology. A systematic review of the medical literature was completed to inform this update. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and meeting materials from ASCO and the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer were all searched. Primary outcomes of interest were complete response and rates of any vomiting or nausea. Thirty-seven trials met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review. Two systematic reviews from the Cochrane Collaboration were identified; one surveyed the pediatric literature. The other compared the relative efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists. Combined anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimens were reclassified as highly emetic. Patients who receive this combination or any highly emetic agents should receive a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 (NK(1)) receptor antagonist. A large trial validated the equivalency of fosaprepitant, a single-day intravenous formulation, with aprepitant; either therapy is appropriate. Preferential use of palonosetron is recommended for moderate emetic risk regimens, combined with dexamethasone. For low-risk agents, patients can be offered dexamethasone before the first dose of chemotherapy. Patients undergoing high emetic risk radiation therapy should receive a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist before each fraction and for 24 hours after treatment and may receive a 5-day course of dexamethasone during fractions 1 to 5. The Update Committee noted the importance of continued symptom monitoring throughout therapy. Clinicians underestimate the incidence of nausea, which is not as well controlled as emesis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comparative analysis of two rates

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cindy.l.weinstein@merck.com
                Karin.Jordan@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                stuart_green@merck.com
                Saleem.Khanani@heywood.org
                lizbeck10@yahoo.com
                steve.noga@gmail.com
                bernardo.rapoport@up.ac.za
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                25 September 2020
                25 September 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 918
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.417993.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2260 0793, Merck & Co., Inc., ; 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.7700.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2190 4373, University of Heidelberg, ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [3 ]Heywood Hospital, 242 Green Street, Gardner, MA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.415030.3, ISNI 0000 0000 9148 7539, Weinberg Cancer Institute, ; 9103 Franklin Square Drive, Baltimore, MD USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.49697.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 2298, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, , University of Pretoria, ; Corner Doctor Savage Road and Bophelo Road, Pretoria, 0002 South Africa
                [6 ]GRID grid.500475.3, The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, ; 129 Oxford Road, Saxonwold, Johannesburg, 2196 South Africa
                Article
                7259
                10.1186/s12885-020-07259-5
                7523353
                de02d534-b86c-4f3f-bf58-ed09312a31a2
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 August 2019
                : 4 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (cinv),fosaprepitant,gastrointestinal cancer,lung cancer,breast cancer,gynecologic cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article