2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pandemia de COVID y respuesta de la nutrición clínica en España: resultados de una encuesta nacional Translated title: COVID pandemic and clinical nutrition response in Spain: results of a national survey

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Introducción: la pandemia ocasionada por el SARS-CoV-2 ha obligado a realizar importantes cambios organizativos y asistenciales en el sistema sanitario. Sin embargo, hasta ahora se desconoce cuáles han sido las circunstancias que han sufrido los profesionales sanitarios que han atendido esta pandemia desde los servicios de nutrición clínica en España. Objetivos: describir los cambios de gestión y asistenciales realizados en las unidades de nutrición clínica en España y su repercusión en la práctica clínica. Material y métodos: estudio transversal mediante técnica de encuesta dirigida a socios de la SENPE (junio 2020). Se incluyen en el estudio respuestas remitidas por profesionales sanitarios del ámbito de la nutrición clínica que atendieron a pacientes con COVID-19 en hospitales españoles. Resultados: se analizan 116 encuestas provenientes en su mayoría de médicos (57,8 %) y de hospitales de más de 500 camas (56 %); el 46 % de los encuestados teletrabajó. Se contó con la presencia de un plan de atención nutricional en el 68 % de los casos, plan que fue mayoritario en los hospitales con más de 500 camas (p < 0,001). En estos hospitales se implantaron más dietas específicas para COVID-19 que en los menores de 500 camas: 18 (35,3 %) vs. 44 (67,7 %), (p < 0,001). El uso de las recomendaciones de las sociedades científicas se notificó en el 86 % de los casos. El 38,8 % nunca o casi nunca pudieron hacer una valoración nutricional satisfactoria. La prescripción de suplementos nutricionales fue no inferior al 50 %. El 51,7 % de los encuestados calificaron su actuación como satisfactoria o muy satisfactoria, y esta no se relacionó con el tamaño de hospital pero sí con haber implantado una dieta para la COVID-19 (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: la nutrición clínica en España ha respondido a la pandemia de COVID-19 con cambios organizativos y de gestión y, aunque la asistencia se ha visto claramente afectada, se han podido mantener algunos estándares de calidad. Los hospitales de mayor tamaño han tenido cierta ventaja para realizar estos ajustes.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Introduction: the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced major organizational and care changes in the health system. However, in Spain, the circumstances suffered by the health professionals who have cared for pandemic patients from a clinical nutrition standpoint has remained unknown up to this moment. Objectives: the management and care changes made in clinical nutrition units in Spain, and their impact on clinical practice are described. Material and methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out using a survey directed at SENPE members (June 2020). Responses sent by health professionals in the field of clinical nutrition who had treated patients with COVID-19 in Spanish hospitals were included in the study. Resultados: a total of 116 survey forms were analyzed, mostly filled out by doctors (57.8 %) working at hospitals with more than 500 beds (56 %); 46 % of survey respondents were on telework. There was a nutritional care plan in 68 % of cases, such plan being present mainly in hospitals with more than 500 beds (p < 0.001). In these hospitals more specific diets for COVID-19 were implemented than in those under 500 beds: 18 (35.3 %) vs 44 (67.7 %), (p < 0.001). The use of recommendations issued by scientific societies was reported in 86 % of cases. Never or almost never could a satisfactory nutritional assessment be performed for 38.8 %. The prescription of nutritional supplements was not less than 50 %. Health workers rated their performance as satisfactory or very satisfactory (51.7 %), and this was not related to hospital size but to having implemented a COVID-19 diet (p < 0.05). Conclusions: clinical nutrition in Spain has responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with organizational and managerial changes and, although care has been clearly affected, some quality standards were ultimately maintained. Larger hospitals have had some advantages in making these adjustments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection

          Summary The COVID-19 pandemics is posing unprecedented challenges and threats to patients and healthcare systems worldwide. Acute respiratory complications that require intensive care unit (ICU) management are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Patients with worst outcomes and higher mortality are reported to include immunocompromised subjects, namely older adults and polymorbid individuals and malnourished people in general. ICU stay, polymorbidity and older age are all commonly associated with high risk for malnutrition, representing per se a relevant risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality in chronic and acute disease. Also importantly, prolonged ICU stays are reported to be required for COVID-19 patients stabilization, and longer ICU stay may per se directly worsen or cause malnutrition, with severe loss of skeletal muscle mass and function which may lead to disability, poor quality of life and additional morbidity. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malnutrition should therefore be routinely included in the management of COVID-19 patients. In the current document, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) aims at providing concise guidance for nutritional management of COVID-19 patients by proposing 10 practical recommendations. The practical guidance is focused to those in the ICU setting or in the presence of older age and polymorbidity, which are independently associated with malnutrition and its negative impact on patient survival.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The resilience of the Spanish health system against the COVID-19 pandemic

            Spain, with more than 11 000 cases and 491 deaths as of March 17, 2020, has one of the highest burdens of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. In response, its government used a royal decree (463/2020) 1 to declare a 15-day national emergency, starting on March 15. Although the Spanish health system has coped well during the 6 weeks since its first case was diagnosed, it will be tested severely in the coming weeks as there is already widespread community transmission in the most affected regions, Madrid, the Basque Country, and Catalonia. The number of new cases in the country is increasing by more than 1000 each day. A crisis such as this places pressure on all building blocks of a health system, 2 each of which we consider in turn. The first is governance. Coordination is crucial in any country, but especially in one like Spain in which responsibility for health is devolved to 17 very diverse regions. The Health Alert and Emergency Coordination Centre (Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias in Spanish), created in 2004, provides a mechanism for coordination between the national and regional governments. This mechanism has not, however, ensured that measures are fully coordinated. Thus, the Basque Country declared a public health emergency before any other region, whereas Catalonia requested a complete shutdown of the region, including closure of air, sea, and land ports. Madrid, La Rioja, and Vitoria banned gatherings of more than 1000 people. These measures were accompanied by a range of social distancing measures, including closure of schools, universities, libraries, centres for older people, and sporting venues, and even restricting all movement in some of the most affected areaS. 3 In a country in which regional autonomy has been politically important, the new decree includes a controversial measure to give the central government sweeping new powers over health services, transport, and internal affairs, including giving members of the armed forces powers of law enforcement. These measures have provoked opposition in Catalonia and the Basque Country, which have their own police forces that will now come under national control. However, the imposition of restrictions on movement of people to allow only that necessary to get to work or buy food and medicines, as well as the closure of borders does seem to have been accepted, at least so far, with only limited disagreement among the main parties on the measures adopted. The second building block is financing. Before the decree, central government adopted a series of financial measures to support the health system and protect businesses. It had allocated €2800 million to all regions for health services and created a new fund with €1000 million for priority health interventions. 4 However, these amounts need to be seen against the background of almost a decade of austerity from which the health system has yet to recover. 5 Third, in service delivery, the national Ministry of Health has developed a set of clinical protocols, published on its website. Additional advice is published by certain regions and updated, in some cases, on a daily basis. 6 Health facilities in the worst affected regions are struggling, with inadequate intensive care capacity and an insufficient number of ventilators in particular. Both Catalonia and Madrid 7 have cancelled non-emergency surgery and cleared beds where possible. COVID-19 telephone help lines have long delays or have simply collapsed in some regions. The new decree allows the regions to take over management of private health services while military installations will be used for public health purposes. The fourth block is medicines and equipment. So far, no serious shortages have been reported but supplies of personal protective equipment in health facilities have been a concern in all regions leading to re-use, despite the known risks. There is a particular shortage of face masks caused by early panic buying. These shortages have encouraged profiteering, with private laboratories, for example, charging exorbitant amounts for tests. 8 In response, the central government has centralised purchasing and introduced price controls on medicines 9 requiring companies producing relevant equipment to inform the central government of their stocks within 48 h. The fifth block comprises health workers. Many reports suggest that they are stretched to the point of exhaustion. This situation in part reflects existing staff shortages, again following years of austerity with resultant low salaries. Before the decree, patchy and insufficient measures were suggested such as cancelling holidays or bringing retired nurses and doctors back into the health service. The problems are being exacerbated by the quarantining of a growing number of health workers exposed to patients who are infected. 10 The new decree permits hiring graduates without specialisation, final year medical and nursing students, and extending contracts of medical residents. The final building block, information, is widely considered to have been provided by authorities at all levels in a timely manner via mainstream and social media. The Spanish media has largely acted responsibly, disseminating accurate information and debunking fake news stories circulating on social media networks. These developments have coincided with changing attitudes among the Spanish population. Initially, the disease attracted little attention, but this calm soon gave way to panic and hoarding of key supplies once cases began to increase. However, many manifestations of solidarity have been seen, such as supporting health professionals, those who are most vulnerable, and voluntary social distancing, including greater home working. Already, at least five important lessons can be drawn from the Spanish experience. First, additional financial resources are needed to support regional health systems, each with different initial resources and current challenges. Second, long-term underinvestment in health services, as seen in many countries following the 2008 financial crisis, impairs their resilience by depleting their ability to respond to surges in need for health care with sufficient health professionals, intensive care unit beds, protective equipment, diagnostic test kits, and mechanical ventilators. Third, although Spanish residents do seem largely to have responded responsibly so far, it will be important to draw on evidence from behavioural sciences to ensure that this conduct continues over what could be many months. Fourth, although coordination between the national and regional governments has generally been good, work will be needed to ensure this continues over the next few months, with an understanding that politicians must not be allowed to exploit the situation for political gain. Finally, once the pandemic is over, Spain will need to address the decade of underinvestment in its previously strong health sector, which has left it struggling at this time of crisis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Summary of international recommendations in 23 languages for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic

              Patients with cancer are at high risk for serious illness and death from COVID-19. The pandemic has altered the routine for oncology patients. Their lives depend on their ability to receive medical care, but every visit to a health-care facility exposes them to the risk of contracting the virus; therefore, concerns about getting infected might interfere with their continuity of care. Does oncology treatment outweigh the risk of infection? The psychological pressure of uncertainty for patients with cancer is particularly high. In this difficult phase, these patients need guidance and support. Professional guidance becomes of extreme importance for reducing the risk of contracting the virus, promoting patients' safety, treatment, and compliance, and ameliorating patients' stress. Several medical centres and national and international oncology societies are attempting to provide guidance to patients, but their extent and content vary; some national oncology societies have not provided any recommendations at all. We have developed an international scientific panel with the aim to review available guidelines from 63 oncology societies (appendix p 2) and provide summarised comprehensive recommendations for patients with cancer. 29 of 63 oncology societies provided some form of guidance for patients, either as their own recommendation statements or as a link to guidance from other societies (we only considered links to guidelines written in the society's native language). As most patients worldwide do not speak English, the language of guidance delivery is a major barrier to the dissemination of recommendations in different countries (figure ). Therefore, we have translated the summary of the comprehensive recommendations into 22 languages (Arabic, Bulgarian, Catalan, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Serbian, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish). The text and translations can be found at the European Cancer Patients Coalition and Hellenic Cancer Federation websites. We are working on a translation into Urdu. 48 physicians from 27 countries voluntarily participated in the working panel. Figure Number of people (in millions) whose native language is in the top 23 most spoken worldwide (A) Comparison of the number of English speakers (green) with speakers of the remaining 22 languages; the proportion of English speakers is 8%. (B) Number of people whose native language is covered by our multilanguage translation (green); the proportion of people able to access guidelines in their native language is 68%. Our panel identified six main areas of recommendations. The English version of the guidance with references is presented in the appendix (pp 4–26). The first area concerns general considerations for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic (appendix p 4). Patients with cancer are at higher risk for infection, admission to the intensive care unit, and death. This high risk is related to the immunosuppression caused by a variety of factors, such as the disease itself, low performance status, cachexia, and the effect of treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, radiotherapy, and bone marrow transplantation). The degree of immunosuppression depends on the type of cancer, the patient's age, fitness, comorbidities, the type of therapy, and the time since last therapy. Patients with haematological malignancies, especially those who received bone marrow transplants recently, are at particularly high risk. Patients with cancer are encouraged to ask their physicians about their individual risk. COVID-19 symptoms appear 2–14 days after exposure and include fever, cough, runny nose, sore throat, body aches, diarrhoea, and loss of smell or taste. Immediate medical attention should be sought for more severe symptoms, such as high fever, difficulty breathing, chest pain, confusion, and blue lips or face. Patients with cancer should have a low threshold for seeking medical attention if they have any new symptoms. The second area of recommendation regards specific protocols or any special measure that people with cancer should take to avoid COVID-19 infection (appendix p 6). The best way to prevent infection is to avoid exposure to the virus by implementing strict hygienic and behavioural measures. Patients with cancer and household members should follow these measures more strictly given their high risk of infection. Cancer survivors might not be at such high risk but should contact their physician to find out more about their individual risk. Hygienic measures include frequent hand washing, disinfecting objects, avoiding handling objects in public places, and washing fruits and vegetables. Behavioural modifications include staying at home, not gathering in public places, and not touching other people. Travel, non-essential home visitors, the use of public transport, and the purchase of unpackaged food should be avoided. The use of a face mask is recommended, at least in crowded places, but not as a replacement for other established preventive measures. It should be worn when visiting a cancer centre or hospital. The third area of recommendation reflects on what to do if someone is symptomatic, and indicates to patients whether there are any vaccines, treatment, or dietary or other supplementations that are effective against COVID-19 infection (appendix p 9). Patients with cancer should avoid people with a known exposure, infected asymptomatic people, and infected symptomatic people for at least 14 days and until their symptoms have resolved. If a patient with cancer experiences new cold-like symptoms, they should contact their oncologist and remain strictly quarantined. Currently, there are no vaccines or drugs that have been proven to treat or prevent COVID-19. There is no evidence that dietary interventions, complementary and alternative medicines, or supplements can treat or prevent COVID-19. The fourth area of recommendation is related to mental health: guidance on managing anxiety and stress (appendix p 11). Patients with cancer are encouraged to live as healthily as they can. Some recommendations include breathing fresh air, engaging in physical exercise and creative activities, and having quality time with their families. Rest, sleep, and healthy eating are important. Patients' levels of stress and anxiety are generally high during a pandemic, especially because they are already dealing with cancer. Some suggestions to counteract these negative feelings include communication with friends and family, engaging in pleasant activities, meditation, yoga and physical exercise, eating healthily, avoiding excessive exposure to the news, and following good sleep hygiene. Patients who feel that they cannot cope with their stress should talk to their doctor. Building trust between physicians and patients to enhance patients' confidence in medical staff decisions and improve their compliance with medical advice is important, and is the fifth area of recommendation (appendix p 13). The main goal of the medical team is to keep patients safe from COVID-19 while retaining the highest quality of care for their cancer. Patients should trust their physicians regarding deviations from their usual care. Treatment for infected or exposed patients might be deferred by 14 days or longer. For all patients with cancer, the possibilities of delaying or holding treatment are being evaluated on a case-by-case basis, according to the overall clinical picture, the aggressiveness of the cancer, and the potential health risks from COVID-19. During the acute phase of the pandemic, preventive care, elective procedures, some chemotherapy treatments, and supportive treatments are being postponed. Many visits are being converted to telephone or video visits. Cancer centres are altering the routines that patients are used to. It is important that patients remain confident that their oncology teams are there to support them. Patients need to be aware that a lot of misleading information circulates on the internet. The best sources of safe information online can be found on official websites provided by medical centres, oncology societies, and governments. Finally, the sixth area of recommendation concerns the procedures at cancer centres (appendix p 16). Patients and visitors who have symptoms or have been exposed to an infected person should not visit their cancer centre, but should first call their doctor's office for further instruction. Symptomatic patients who arrive at the hospital should wear a face mask and report their symptoms upon arrival. All patients should keep a safe distance from other individuals. Not more than one visitor should accompany the patient. Patients and visitors must wash their hands upon entering and leaving the centre. At the hospital, patients with known or suspected COVID-19 are being kept in separate wards, and no visitors are allowed. For patients without COVID-19, only one visitor is allowed (or none in some places). Patients with cancer need to think about their goals of care in advance and discuss them with their loved ones and physicians. There is no evidence that COVID-19 is transmittable by blood. Blood donors are encouraged to continue donating unless they have new symptoms or a possible exposure to COVID-19. Patients with cancer are facing unprecedented circumstances. We believe that a summary of recommendations from different oncology societies across the globe and their multilanguage translation will provide useful guidance to patients and caregivers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                nh
                Nutrición Hospitalaria
                Nutr. Hosp.
                Grupo Arán (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                0212-1611
                1699-5198
                February 2021
                : 38
                : 1
                : 207-212
                Affiliations
                [2] Santa Cruz de Tenerife orgnameDirección General de Salud Pública orgdiv1Servicio Canario de Salud España
                [3] Burgos orgnameUniversidad Isabel I orgdiv1Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud España
                [5] Parla Madrid orgnameHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina España
                [6] Sevilla orgnameHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme España
                [1] San Cristóbal de la Laguna Tenerife orgnameHospital Universitario de Canarias España
                [4] A Coruña orgnameComplexo Hospitalario Universitario orgdiv1Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición España
                Article
                S0212-16112021000100207 S0212-1611(21)03800100207
                10.20960/nh.03370
                33319580
                de39ed12-2c2d-4bbf-a1b1-d7da740056bf

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 November 2020
                : 28 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 6
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Grupo de Trabajo SENPE

                Nutrición clínica,COVID-19,SARS-CoV-2,Health personnel,Personal de Salud,Survey,Clinical management,Clinical nutrition,Gestión clínica,Encuesta

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content51

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors153