51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determination of the best position and site for color Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of the testicular vein to define the clinical grades of varicocele ultrasonographically

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          There are no generally accepted criteria for the ultrasonographic diagnosis and grading of varicocele. We aimed to determine the best position and site for color Doppler ultrasonographic (CDUS) evaluation of the testicular vein to define the clinical grades of varicocele ultrasonographically.

          Materials and Methods:

          This study consisted of 103 men (44 normal and 59 with clinical varicocele). First, WHO clinical grade of varicocele was determined by physical examination. Then, the diameter of largest testicular vein at four different sites was measured in both upright and supine positions with or without Valsalva maneuver. Finally, the cut-off points of venous diameter for different clinical grades were determined using the values of the position and sites that had the strongest correlation with the clinical grades.

          Results:

          The strongest correlation between venous diameter and clinical grade of varicocele was observed when the venous diameter was measured at the level of epididymal head in the upright position with Valsalva maneuver ( r: 0.87, P-value < 0.0001). In aforementioned conditions, venous diameter of 2.35 mm (sensitivity 87%, specificity 87%) can distinguish normal subjects from grade 1 varicocele, venous diameter of 3.15 mm (sensitivity 58%, specificity 70%) can discriminate grade 1 from grade 2, and venous diameter of 3.75 mm (sensitivity 83%, specificity 70%) can differentiate grade 2 from grade 3. Furthermore, venous diameter of 2.65 mm (sensitivity 91%, specificity 89%) can distinguish normal subjects from patients with clinical varicocele.

          Conclusion:

          The best position for CDUS examination of patients suspected of having varicocele is the upright position with Valsalva maneuver, and the best site for venous diameter measurement is at the level of epididymal head.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility.

            Varicoceles are found in 19 to 41% of infertile men, and is one treatable form of male infertility. The mechanism by which varicoceles cause the variable effect on male infertility and spermatogenesis is still unknown. Experimental animal models play a useful (but limited) role due to the sudden and variable iatrogenic nature of the varicoceles and the duration of the studies. Much of the human data are derived by the characterization of associated differences in measurable parameters between men with and without varicoceles. The role of hyperthermia, testicular blood flow and venous pressure changes, reflux of renal/adrenal products, hormonal dysfunction, autoimmunity, defects in acrosome reaction, and oxidative stress, in the pathophysiology of varicocele will be discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Varicocele: a bilateral disease.

              To evaluate the prevalence of varicocele in the left and right spermatic veins in infertile men by several methods of examination. Prospective study. Andrology unit of a department of obstetrics and gynecology, and interventional radiology unit of the radiology department at a tertiary care facility. Two hundred eighty-six infertile men evaluated for varicocele. Patients underwent evaluation for infertility. Physical examination was followed by contact thermography, Doppler sonography, and venography of both testes. We measured the prevalence of varicocele in the left and right spermatic veins in infertile men, and the response of semen parameters after embolization of internal spermatic vein. Varicocele was detected by one of the noninvasive methods and confirmed by venography in 255 patients (89.2%): the left site in 45 (17.6%), the right side in 4 (1.5%), and bilaterally in 206 (80.8%). All patients were treated by embolization. Mean sperm concentration increased from 6.12 +/- 1.02 to 21.3 +/- 1.69 million/mL; mean sperm motility from 16.81 +/- 1.51 to 35.90 +/- 1.41%; and mean sperm morphology from 9.75 +/- 0.85 to 16.92 +/- 1.17%. Pregnancy rate was 43.5%. The present study finds that what was traditionally considered a predominantly unilateral anatomical abnormality apparently has a strikingly high bilateral prevalence (80.7%). This may suggest that we should consider varicocele a bilateral disease. The second finding is the high rate of varicocele detected by venography, thermography, and sonography when compared with physical examination results. Our study may have important implications for treatment, indicating that patients with clinical evidence of unilateral left varicocele should be carefully evaluated for bilateral varicocele.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Adv Biomed Res
                Adv Biomed Res
                ABR
                Advanced Biomedical Research
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2277-9175
                2014
                09 January 2014
                : 3
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Radiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [2 ]Medical Students’ Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Saeid Khanbabapour, Department of Radiology, Alzahra Hospital, Soffeh Ave., Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: khanbabapour@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                ABR-3-17
                10.4103/2277-9175.124647
                3928839
                de76a448-2977-416e-9b35-219494fb285b
                Copyright: © 2014 Karami.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 08 May 2013
                : 10 July 2013
                Categories
                Original Article

                varicocele,color doppler ultrasound,venous diameter
                varicocele, color doppler ultrasound, venous diameter

                Comments

                Comment on this article