113
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    12
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A randomised, 52-week, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine when administered as add-on to glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims/hypothesis

          This 52-week multinational, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared clinical outcomes following supplementation of oral glucose-lowering drugs with basal insulin analogues detemir and glargine in type 2 diabetic patients.

          Methods

          Insulin-naive adults ( n = 582, HbA 1c 7.5–10.0%, BMI ≤ 40.0 kg/m 2) were randomised 1:1 to receive insulin detemir or glargine once daily (evening) actively titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤ 6.0 mmol/l. An additional morning insulin detemir dose was permitted if pre-dinner plasma glucose (PG) was >7.0 mmol/l after achieving FPG < 7.0 mmol/l. Due to labelling restrictions, no second glargine dose was allowed.

          Results

          Baseline HbA 1c decreased from 8.6 to 7.2 and 7.1% (NS) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG improved from 10.8 to 7.1 and 7.0 mmol/l (NS), respectively. With detemir, 45% of participants completed the study on once daily dosing and 55% on twice daily dosing, with no difference in HbA 1c. Overall, 52% of participants achieved HbA 1c ≤ 7.0%: 33% (detemir) and 35% (glargine) without hypoglycaemia. Within-participant variability for self-monitored FPG and pre-dinner PG did not differ by insulin treatment, nor did the relative risk of overall or nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Modest reductions in weight gain were seen with detemir vs glargine in completers (3.0 vs 3.9 kg, p = 0.01) and in the intention-to-treat population (2.7 vs 3.5 kg, p = 0.03), primarily related to completers on once-daily detemir. Mean daily detemir dose was higher (0.78 U/kg [0.52 with once daily dosing, 1.00 U/kg with twice daily dosing]) than glargine (0.44 IU/kg). Injection site reactions were more frequent with detemir (4.5 vs 1.4%).

          Conclusions/interpretation

          Supplementation of oral agents with detemir or glargine achieves clinically important improvements in glycaemic control with low risk of hypoglycaemia. Non-inferiority was demonstrated for detemir using higher insulin doses (mainly patients on twice daily dosing); weight gain was somewhat reduced with once daily insulin detemir.

          ClinicalTrials.gov ID no.: NCT00283751.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-007-0911-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.

          To compare the abilities and associated hypoglycemia risks of insulin glargine and human NPH insulin added to oral therapy of type 2 diabetes to achieve 7% HbA(1c). In a randomized, open-label, parallel, 24-week multicenter trial, 756 overweight men and women with inadequate glycemic control (HbA(1c) >7.5%) on one or two oral agents continued prestudy oral agents and received bedtime glargine or NPH once daily, titrated using a simple algorithm seeking a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Glycemic Control With Diet, Sulfonylurea, Metformin, or Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusProgressive Requirement for Multiple Therapies (UKPDS 49)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin.

              Insulin therapy has proven benefits in Type 2 diabetes patients when combination therapy has failed. However, there is some reluctance by both patients and healthcare professionals to initiate insulin therapy. This reluctance has been termed 'psychological insulin resistance'. Barriers to the initiation of insulin therapy include patients' fear of disease progression and needle anxiety; mutual concerns about hypoglycaemia and weight gain; and health professionals' use of insulin as a threat to encourage compliance with earlier therapies. It is essential that these obstacles are identified and investigated as a means of overcoming these impediments to recommended levels of glycaemic control, an initiative being pursued by the DAWN study. Where concerns are tangible, such as fear of hypoglycaemia, therapeutic solutions can be pursued. Overcoming psychological barriers relies more on innovative management techniques. Improving insulin delivery to meet these needs, coupled with enhanced healthcare services, can address psychological insulin resistance and contribute to the maintenance of good metabolic control.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                juliorosenstock@dallasdiabetes.com
                Journal
                Diabetologia
                Diabetologia
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0012-186X
                1432-0428
                16 January 2008
                March 2008
                : 51
                : 3
                : 408-416
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center at Medical City, 7777 Forest Lane C-685, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
                [2 ]Cardiovascular Sciences Department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
                [3 ]School of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [4 ]Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Rudolfstiftung Hospital-Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                Article
                911
                10.1007/s00125-007-0911-x
                2235909
                18204830
                de84f4ab-3ece-4a67-b001-7ac9b3255300
                © Springer-Verlag 2007
                History
                : 23 September 2007
                : 7 November 2007
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2008

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                insulin glargine,glucose control,hypoglycaemia,fasting plasma glucose,body weight,oral glucose-lowering agents,glucose variability,insulin supplementation,insulin detemir,type 2 diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article