6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Health service waiting areas commonly provide health information, resources and supports for consumers; however, the effect on health literacy and related outcomes remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to explore the use of waiting areas as a place to contribute to the health literacy and related outcomes of consumers attending health appointments. Articles were included if they focussed on health literacy or health literacy responsiveness (concept) in outpatient or primary care health service waiting areas (context) for adult consumers (population) and were published after 2010. Ten bibliographic databases, one full-text archive, dissertation repositories and web sources were searched. The search yielded 5095 records. After duplicate removal, 3942 title/abstract records were screened and 360 full-text records assessed. Data were charted into a standardized data extraction tool. A total of 116 unique articles (published empirical and grey literature) were included. Most articles were set in primary and community care (49%) waiting areas. A diverse range of health topics and resource types were available, but results demonstrated they were not always used by consumers. Outcomes measured in intervention studies were health knowledge, intentions and other psychological factors, self-reported and observed behaviours, clinical outcomes and health service utilization. Intervention studies overall demonstrated positive trends in health literacy-related outcomes, although the benefit declined after 3–6 months. Research on using waiting areas for health literacy purposes is increasing globally. Future research investigating the needs of consumers to inform optimal intervention design is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references108

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

            The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

              The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health Promot Int
                Health Promot Int
                heapro
                Health Promotion International
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0957-4824
                1460-2245
                August 2023
                13 July 2023
                13 July 2023
                : 38
                : 4
                : daad046
                Affiliations
                Department of Physiotherapy , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
                Allied Health - Physiotherapy , The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
                Allied Health , Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
                Health Sciences Library , The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
                Department of Business Intelligence and Reporting , Bass Coast Health, Wonthaggi, VIC 3995, Australia
                Department of Physiotherapy , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
                Allied Health - Physiotherapy , The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
                Department of Physiotherapy , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
                Department of Physiotherapy , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
                Allied Health - Physiotherapy , The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
                Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
                Department of Physiotherapy, Federation University , Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia
                Department of Physiotherapy , The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
                Allied Health - Physiotherapy , The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. E-mail: cassie.mcdonald@ 123456unimelb.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-5869
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1627-0342
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1854-3161
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2510-109X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-8361
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-9837
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-7327
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6169-370X
                Article
                daad046
                10.1093/heapro/daad046
                10340083
                37440256
                de993651-1bdb-47dc-a0cd-481b37e9f8d1
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Commonwealth Government Research Training Program Scholarship;
                Categories
                Perspectives
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860

                Public health
                health information,health literacy,health service,waiting area
                Public health
                health information, health literacy, health service, waiting area

                Comments

                Comment on this article