13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dilemmas in the Management of an Infant with Neuroblastoma Metastasized to the Muscles

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The risk stratification of infants with metastatic neuroblastoma (NB) has evolved over time from stage 4/M or IVs/4S/MS/Ms according to various staging systems. Despite these developments for some genetic aberrations, the prognostic value and the impact of soft tissue metastases in infants are not fully understood, nor well described in the different classification systems, hampering the definitions to uniformly treat patients and predict prognosis. A literature review on staging of infants with M/MS disease was performed at the occasion of the diagnosis of NB in an 8-month-old boy who presented with atypical metastatic sites in soft tissue and an aberrant tumor biology. The definitions of stage 4/4S/4s/M/MS/Ms were evaluated and compared to enable tumor risk stratification and inform management. International NB groups use different criteria for defining stage of infants with metastasized NB, resulting in differences in management. Limited literature is available on soft tissue metastases, especially muscular metastases, and is poorly incorporated into management guidelines mainly due to the lack of data. The uncertain prognosis of rare genetic aberrancies may add to the difficulties in treatment decisions. In some rare cases of NB in infants, the international treatment classification is not sufficient for staging and treatment decisions. Based on tumor progression, biology of unknown significance and a lack of evidence to classify a child under 12 months with NB and multiple muscular metastases, the patient was treated as stage 4/M and intermediate-risk protocols with a favorable outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report.

          The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification. Because the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) is a postsurgical staging system, a new clinical staging system was required for the INRG pretreatment risk classification system. To stage patients before any treatment, the INRG Task Force, consisting of neuroblastoma experts from Australia/New Zealand, China, Europe, Japan, and North America, developed a new INRG staging system (INRGSS) based on clinical criteria and image-defined risk factors (IDRFs). To investigate the impact of IDRFs on outcome, survival analyses were performed on 661 European patients with INSS stages 1, 2, or 3 disease for whom IDRFs were known. In the INGRSS, locoregional tumors are staged L1 or L2 based on the absence or presence of one or more of 20 IDRFs, respectively. Metastatic tumors are defined as stage M, except for stage MS, in which metastases are confined to the skin, liver, and/or bone marrow in children younger than 18 months of age. Within the 661-patient cohort, IDRFs were present (ie, stage L2) in 21% of patients with stage 1, 45% of patients with stage 2, and 94% of patients with stage 3 disease. Patients with INRGSS stage L2 disease had significantly lower 5-year event-free survival than those with INRGSS stage L1 disease (78% +/- 4% v 90% +/- 3%; P = .0010). Use of the new staging (INRGSS) and risk classification (INRG) of neuroblastoma will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.

            Based on preliminary experience, there was a need for modifications and clarifications in the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). In 1988, a proposal was made to establish an internationally accepted staging system for neuroblastoma, as well as consistent criteria for confirming the diagnosis and determining response to therapy (Brodeur GM, et al: J Clin Oncol 6:1874-1881, 1988). A meeting was held to review experience with the INSS and INRC and to revise or clarify the language and intent of the originally proposed criteria. Substantial changes included a redefinition of the midline, restrictions on age and bone marrow involvement for stage 4S, and the recommendation that meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scanning be implemented for evaluating the extent of disease. Other modifications and clarifications of the INSS and INRC are presented. In addition, the criteria for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma were modified. Finally, proposals were made for the development of risk groups that incorporate both clinical and biologic features in the prediction of prognosis. The biologic features that were deemed important to evaluate prospectively included serum ferritin, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH); tumor histology; tumor-cell DNA content; assessment of N-myc copy number; assessment of 1p deletion by cytogenetic or molecular methods; and TRK-A expression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revised Neuroblastoma Risk Classification System: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

              Treatment planning for children with neuroblastoma requires accurate assessment of prognosis. The most recent Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk classification system used tumor stage as defined by the International Neuroblastoma Staging System. Here, we validate a revised classifier using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS) and incorporate segmental chromosome aberrations (SCA) as an additional genomic biomarker.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Case Rep Oncol
                Case Rep Oncol
                CRO
                CRO
                Case Reports in Oncology
                S. Karger AG (Basel, Switzerland )
                1662-6575
                26 July 2023
                Jan-Dec 2023
                26 July 2023
                : 16
                : 1
                : 558-567
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
                [b ]Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                [c ]Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
                [d ]Department of Pediatric Haematology, Oncology and Stem cell transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Jaques van Heerden, Jaques.vanheerden@ 123456uza.be
                Article
                531433
                10.1159/000531433
                10601722
                37900821
                df04f124-9e8e-4d46-abe4-29c1dcbcbd6f
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) ( http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission

                History
                : 18 April 2023
                : 1 June 2023
                : 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 32, Pages: 10
                Funding
                No funding was received.
                Categories
                Case Report

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                neuroblastoma,soft tissue metastasis,risk stratification,infant,case report

                Comments

                Comment on this article