39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This population-based cohort study aimed to investigate the demographic and psychosocial characteristics associated with fear of childbirth and the relative importance of such fear as a predictor of elective caesarean section.

          Methods

          A sample of 1789 women from the Akershus Birth Cohort in Norway provided data collected by three self-administered questionnaires at 17 and 32 weeks of pregnancy and 8 weeks postpartum. Information about the participants’ childbirths was obtained from the hospital records.

          Results

          Eight percent of the women reported fear of delivery, defined as a score of ≥85 on the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire. Using multivariable logistic regression models, a previous negative overall birth experience exerted the strongest impact on fear of childbirth, followed by impaired mental health and poor social support. Fear of childbirth was strongly associated with a preference for elective caesarean section (aOR 4.6, 95 % CI 2.9–7.3) whereas the association of fear with performance of caesarean delivery was weaker (aOR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.2–4.9). The vast majority (87 %) of women with fear of childbirth did not, however, receive a caesarean section. By contrast, a previous negative overall birth experience was highly predictive of elective caesarean section (aOR 8.1, 95 % CI 3.9–16.7) and few women without such experiences did request caesarean section.

          Conclusions

          Results suggest that women with fear of childbirth may have identifiable vulnerability characteristics, such as poor mental health and poor social support. Results also emphasize the need to focus on the subjective experience of the birth to prevent fear of childbirth and elective caesarean sections on maternal request. Regarding the relationship with social support, causality has to be interpreted cautiously, as social support was measured at 8 weeks postpartum only.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

          The development of a 10-item self-report scale (EPDS) to screen for Postnatal Depression in the community is described. After extensive pilot interviews a validation study was carried out on 84 mothers using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for depressive illness obtained from Goldberg's Standardised Psychiatric Interview. The EPDS was found to have satisfactory sensitivity and specificity, and was also sensitive to change in the severity of depression over time. The scale can be completed in about 5 minutes and has a simple method of scoring. The use of the EPDS in the secondary prevention of Postnatal Depression is discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women.

            J. Cox (1996)
            This paper reports the validation of the EPDS against a Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnosis of Major and Minor depression. The EPDS was administered to non-postnatal women with older children (mean age of youngest child 3 years 9 months) and to postnatal women (baby aged 6 months). All who scored 9 or above and one third of low scorers were interviewed, using Goldberg's Clinical Interview Schedule. The study confirmed good user acceptability of the EPDS when administered as a postal questionnaire (92% response rate). The EPDS was found to have satisfactory sensitivity (79%) and specificity (85%). Our findings suggest that the EPDS take a place alongside other screening scales for depression in Community samples. It is proposed that when used in these settings it is referred to as the Edinburgh Depression Scale.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Screening for depression during pregnancy with the edinburgh depression scale (EDDS)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                + 47 67 92 94 65 , hegeth@gmail.com
                susanniegel@gmail.com
                samsalad@hotmail.com
                sirvan@ous-hf.no
                malin.eberhard.gran@fhi.no
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                17 September 2015
                17 September 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 221
                Affiliations
                [ ]Health Services Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Post Box 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [ ]Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Lørenskog, Norway
                [ ]Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
                [ ]Norwegian Resource Centre for Women’s Health, Women and Children’s Division, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
                [ ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
                [ ]Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [ ]Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                Article
                655
                10.1186/s12884-015-0655-4
                4573308
                26382746
                df4a2582-02bf-47aa-978e-0b0d4b7a0b36
                © Størksen et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 February 2015
                : 9 September 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                Obstetrics & Gynecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article