4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biomedicine, self and society: An agenda for collaboration and engagement

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The commitment of massive resources – financial, social, organisational, and human – drives developments in biomedicine. Fundamental transformations in the generation and application of knowledge are challenging our understandings and experiences of health, illness, and disease as well as the organisation of research and care. Coupled with the accelerated pace of change, it is pressing that we build authentic collaborations across and between the biomedical sciences, humanities and social sciences, and wider society. It is only in this way that we can ask and answer the penetrating questions that will shape improvements in human health now and in the decades ahead. We delineate the need for such commitments across five key areas of human and societal experience that impact on and are impacted by developments in biomedicine: disease; bodies; global movements and institutions; law; and, science-society engagements. Interactions between ideas, researchers, and communities across and within these domains can provide a way into creating the new knowledges, methods, and partnerships we believe are essential if the promises of biomedicine are to be realised.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Sociology of Expectations:Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                23 January 2019
                2019
                : 4
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                [1 ]Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
                [1 ]Science and Technology Studies Unit (SATSU) , University of York, York, UK
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: One of the authors of this letter, Martyn Pickersgill, contributed a chapter to a Handbook that I co-edited last year: Pickersgill M. 2018. The value of the imagined biological in policy and society: Somaticizing and economising British subject(ivitie)s. In: Gibbon S, Prainsack B, Hilgartner S, Lamoreaux J (eds). Handbook of Genomics, Health & Society. London: Routledge. P99.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9807-9148
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-9023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-7653
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15043.1
                6367656
                df6ba310-170a-4479-855d-b7d29457f284
                Copyright: © 2019 Pickersgill M et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 106612
                Award ID: 209519
                Award ID: 201652
                Award ID: 100561
                Award ID: 104831
                Award ID: 103360
                Award ID: 106635
                Award ID: 100597
                This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a collective grant to the Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society [209519] and individual grants [201652 for SC; 100561 for GH; 104831 for SC-B; 103360 for GL; 106612 for MP; 106635 for DS; 100597 for SS].
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Open Letter
                Articles

                social science,humanities,biomedicine,disease,bodies,global health,law,engagement

                Comments

                Comment on this article