20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combined CDK2 and CDK4/6 Inhibition Overcomes Palbociclib Resistance in Breast Cancer by Enhancing Senescence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are widely used to treat metastatic hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Despite the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors, acquired resistance occurs in almost all cases. Strategies to address this issue have not been developed yet. We investigated mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor in breast cancer and potential therapeutic strategies. We found that cyclin E-CDK2 mediated phosphorylation of C-MYC is responsible for resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor by suppressing C-MYC induced senescence. On the contrary, the synergistic anti-proliferative effect of the combined inhibition of CDK2 and CDK4/6 overcomes acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors by enhancing senescence. Our findings could pave the way for the development CDK2-specific kinase inhibitor for the treatment of breast cancers that are resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitor.

          Abstract

          Breast cancer represents the number one global cancer burden in women and the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subtype comprises approximately 70% of breast cancers. Unfortunately, acquired resistance ultimately occurs in almost all cases, even though cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are a highly effective therapy for HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative subtype. Here, we investigated mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor and potential therapeutic strategies using our palbociclib-resistant preclinical model. We observed that cyclin E was significantly overexpressed in palbociclib-resistant cells, and similar association was also confirmed in pleural effusion samples collected from HR-positive breast cancer patients. After confirmation of cyclin E-CDK2 interaction by co-immunoprecipitation, we demonstrated CDK2 inhibition combined with palbociclib synergistically suppressed proliferation of palbociclib-resistant cells and growth of palbociclib-resistant xenograft in mice. We also proved that enhancing C-MYC-mediated senescence is a novel mechanism behind the synergism created by targeting both CDK2 and CDK4/6. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of cyclin E as a therapeutic target was supported by significant association between CCNE1 overexpression and poor prognosis based on large-scale public gene expression data sets in HR-positive breast cancer patients. Therefore, we propose cyclin E-CDK2 signaling as a promising therapeutic target for overcoming cyclin E-associated resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity

          The systematic translation of cancer genomic data into knowledge of tumor biology and therapeutic avenues remains challenging. Such efforts should be greatly aided by robust preclinical model systems that reflect the genomic diversity of human cancers and for which detailed genetic and pharmacologic annotation is available 1 . Here we describe the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE): a compilation of gene expression, chromosomal copy number, and massively parallel sequencing data from 947 human cancer cell lines. When coupled with pharmacologic profiles for 24 anticancer drugs across 479 of the lines, this collection allowed identification of genetic, lineage, and gene expression-based predictors of drug sensitivity. In addition to known predictors, we found that plasma cell lineage correlated with sensitivity to IGF1 receptor inhibitors; AHR expression was associated with MEK inhibitor efficacy in NRAS-mutant lines; and SLFN11 expression predicted sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors. Altogether, our results suggest that large, annotated cell line collections may help to enable preclinical stratification schemata for anticancer agents. The generation of genetic predictions of drug response in the preclinical setting and their incorporation into cancer clinical trial design could speed the emergence of “personalized” therapeutic regimens 2 .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer.

            Background A phase 2 study showed that progression-free survival was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole than with letrozole alone in the initial treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. We performed a phase 3 study that was designed to confirm and expand the efficacy and safety data for palbociclib plus letrozole for this indication. Methods In this double-blind study, we randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 666 postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, who had not had prior treatment for advanced disease, to receive palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators; secondary end points were overall survival, objective response, clinical benefit response, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetic effects, and safety. Results The median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1 to not estimable) in the palbociclib-letrozole group, as compared with 14.5 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 17.1) in the placebo-letrozole group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.72; P<0.001). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (occurring in 66.4% of the patients in the palbociclib-letrozole group vs. 1.4% in the placebo-letrozole group), leukopenia (24.8% vs. 0%), anemia (5.4% vs. 1.8%), and fatigue (1.8% vs. 0.5%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 1.8% of patients in the palbociclib-letrozole group and in none of the patients in the placebo-letrozole group. Permanent discontinuation of any study treatment as a result of adverse events occurred in 43 patients (9.7%) in the palbociclib-letrozole group and in 13 patients (5.9%) in the placebo-letrozole group. Conclusions Among patients with previously untreated ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, palbociclib combined with letrozole resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than that with letrozole alone, although the rates of myelotoxic effects were higher with palbociclib-letrozole. (Funded by Pfizer; PALOMA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01740427 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer

              Background The inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) could potentially overcome or delay resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer that is positive for hormone receptor (HR) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Methods In this randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib combined with letrozole for first-line treatment in 668 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced disease. We randomly assigned the patients to receive either ribociclib (600 mg per day on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg per day) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, overall response rate, and safety. A preplanned interim analysis was performed on January 29, 2016, after 243 patients had disease progression or died. Prespecified criteria for superiority required a hazard ratio of 0.56 or less with P<1.29×10(-5). Results The duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ribociclib group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.72; P=3.29×10(-6) for superiority). The median duration of follow-up was 15.3 months. After 18 months, the progression-free survival rate was 63.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6 to 70.3) in the ribociclib group and 42.2% (95% CI, 34.8 to 49.5) in the placebo group. In patients with measurable disease at baseline, the overall response rate was 52.7% and 37.1%, respectively (P<0.001). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in more than 10% of the patients in either group were neutropenia (59.3% in the ribociclib group vs. 0.9% in the placebo group) and leukopenia (21.0% vs. 0.6%); the rates of discontinuation because of adverse events were 7.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Conclusions Among patients receiving initial systemic treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, the duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving ribociclib plus letrozole than among those receiving placebo plus letrozole, with a higher rate of myelosuppression in the ribociclib group. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01958021 .).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                29 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 12
                : 12
                : 3566
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea; pkamal@ 123456chauniv.ac.kr (K.P.); skgml0413@ 123456naver.com (N.P.); hurjinz@ 123456naver.com (J.H.); ybyoungbin@ 123456naver.com (Y.B.C.); rbtnr1@ 123456naver.com (M.K.)
                [2 ]Department of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea; kspark@ 123456cha.ac.kr (K.-S.P.); blissfulwin@ 123456cha.ac.kr (S.H.)
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea; hjahn@ 123456cha.ac.kr (H.-J.A.); sewhakim@ 123456chamc.co.kr (S.K.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: ymoon@ 123456cha.ac.kr ; Tel.: +82-10-2825-6357; Fax: +82-31-780-3929
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2144-0577
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2146-6996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-974X
                Article
                cancers-12-03566
                10.3390/cancers12123566
                7768442
                33260316
                df6f75b9-e57f-49a5-ac6a-2d308f5cfbe0
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 05 November 2020
                : 27 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                cdk4/6,cdk2,hormone receptor-positive breast cancer,drug resistance,c-myc

                Comments

                Comment on this article