3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mitochondrial cytochrome c shot towards histone chaperone condensates in the nucleus

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite mitochondria being key for the control of cell homeostasis and fate, their role in DNA damage response is usually just regarded as an apoptotic trigger. However, growing evidence points to mitochondrial factors modulating nuclear functions. Remarkably, after DNA damage, cytochrome c (C c) interacts in the cell nucleus with a variety of well‐known histone chaperones, whose activity is competitively inhibited by the haem protein. As nuclear C c inhibits the nucleosome assembly/disassembly activity of histone chaperones, it might indeed affect chromatin dynamics and histone deposition on DNA. Several histone chaperones actually interact with C c Lys residues through their acidic regions, which are also involved in heterotypic interactions leading to liquid–liquid phase transitions responsible for the assembly of nuclear condensates, including heterochromatin. This relies on dynamic histone–DNA interactions that can be modulated by acetylation of specific histone Lys residues. Thus, C c may have a major regulatory role in DNA repair by fine‐tuning nucleosome assembly activity and likely nuclear condensate formation.

          Abstract

          DNA damage induces liquid–liquid phase separation within DNA foci, thereby allowing repair mechanisms to access damaged sites. DNA damage also makes mitochondrial cytochrome c translocate to the nucleus to sequester histone chaperones, for example SET/TAF‐Iβ, and impair their functions. We thus hypothesize that the INHAT activity in chromatin remodelling might be inhibited, as SET/TAF‐Iβ is a component of the INHAT complex.

          Related collections

          Most cited references271

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease.

          The prime objective for every life form is to deliver its genetic material, intact and unchanged, to the next generation. This must be achieved despite constant assaults by endogenous and environmental agents on the DNA. To counter this threat, life has evolved several systems to detect DNA damage, signal its presence and mediate its repair. Such responses, which have an impact on a wide range of cellular events, are biologically significant because they prevent diverse human diseases. Our improving understanding of DNA-damage responses is providing new avenues for disease management.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chromatin modifications and their function.

            The surface of nucleosomes is studded with a multiplicity of modifications. At least eight different classes have been characterized to date and many different sites have been identified for each class. Operationally, modifications function either by disrupting chromatin contacts or by affecting the recruitment of nonhistone proteins to chromatin. Their presence on histones can dictate the higher-order chromatin structure in which DNA is packaged and can orchestrate the ordered recruitment of enzyme complexes to manipulate DNA. In this way, histone modifications have the potential to influence many fundamental biological processes, some of which may be epigenetically inherited.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

              Damage to our genetic material is an ongoing threat to both our ability to faithfully transmit genetic information to our offspring as well as our own survival. To respond to these threats, eukaryotes have evolved the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is a complex signal transduction pathway that has the ability to sense DNA damage and transduce this information to the cell to influence cellular responses to DNA damage. Cells possess an arsenal of enzymatic tools capable of remodeling and repairing DNA; however, their activities must be tightly regulated in a temporal, spatial, and DNA lesion-appropriate fashion to optimize repair and prevent unnecessary and potentially deleterious alterations in the structure of DNA during normal cellular processes. This review will focus on how the DDR controls DNA repair and the phenotypic consequences of defects in these critical regulatory functions in mammals. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                idiazmoreno@us.es
                marosa@us.es
                Journal
                FEBS Open Bio
                FEBS Open Bio
                10.1002/(ISSN)2211-5463
                FEB4
                FEBS Open Bio
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2211-5463
                19 May 2021
                September 2021
                : 11
                : 9 , In the Limelight: Membraneless organelles ( doiID: 10.1002/feb4.v11.9 )
                : 2418-2440
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute for Chemical Research (IIQ) Scientific Research Centre Isla de la Cartuja (cicCartuja) University of Seville – CSIC Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                I. Díaz‐Moreno or M. A. De la Rosa, Institute for Chemical Research (IIQ), Scientific Research Centre Isla de la Cartuja (cicCartuja), University of Seville – CSIC, Avda. Américo Vespucio 49, Sevilla 41092, Spain

                E‐mails: idiazmoreno@ 123456us.es or marosa@ 123456us.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1124-3847
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-1678
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-5502
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-7758
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-2731
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-8009
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5318-7644
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-5737
                Article
                FEB413176
                10.1002/2211-5463.13176
                8409293
                33938164
                df74ce86-0b90-4aba-b8a5-889f1396fd6b
                © 2021 The Authors. FEBS Open Bio published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 January 2021
                : 26 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 23, Words: 17121
                Funding
                Funded by: Government of Andalusia
                Award ID: BIO198
                Award ID: P18‐FR‐3487
                Award ID: P18‐HO‐4091
                Award ID: US‐1254317
                Award ID: US‐1257019
                Funded by: European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
                Funded by: Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
                Award ID: PGC2018‐096049‐B‐I00
                Award ID: FPU17/04604
                Award ID: FPU18/06577
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.6 mode:remove_FC converted:01.09.2021

                chromatin remodelling,cytochrome c ,dna damage response,histone chaperone,liquid–liquid phase separation,lysine acetylation

                Comments

                Comment on this article