16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it? Why and how might you use it?

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Educating doctors is expensive and poor performance by future graduates can literally cost lives. Whilst the practice of medicine is highly evidence based, medical education is much less so. Research on medical school selection, undergraduate progression, Fitness to Practise (FtP) and postgraduate careers has been hampered across the globe by the challenges of uniting the data required. This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to do so.

          Overview

          A collaborative approach has created a research database commencing with all entrants to UK medical schools in 2007 and 2008 (UKMED Phase 1). Here the content is outlined, governance arrangements considered, system access explained, and the potential implications of this new resource discussed. The data currently include achievements prior to medical school entry, admissions tests, graduation point information and also all subsequent data collected by the General Medical Council, including FtP, career progression, annual National Training Survey (NTS) responses, career choice and postgraduate exam performance data. UKMED has grown since the pilot phase with additional datasets; all subsequent years of students/trainees and stronger governance processes. The inclusion of future cohorts and additional information such as admissions scores or bespoke surveys or assessments is now being piloted. Thus, for instance, new scrutiny can be applied to selection techniques and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Data are available free of charge for approved studies from suitable research groups worldwide.

          Conclusion

          It is anticipated that UKMED will continue on a rolling basis. This has the potential to radically change the volume and types of research that can be envisaged and, therefore, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training. This paper aspires to encourage proposals to utilise this exciting resource.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.

          Selection methods used by medical schools should reliably identify whether candidates are likely to be successful in medical training and ultimately become competent clinicians. However, there is little consensus regarding methods that reliably evaluate non-academic attributes, and longitudinal studies examining predictors of success after qualification are insufficient. This systematic review synthesises the extant research evidence on the relative strengths of various selection methods. We offer a research agenda and identify key considerations to inform policy and practice in the next 50 years.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ACHIEVING k-ANONYMITY PRIVACY PROTECTION USING GENERALIZATION AND SUPPRESSION

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: A twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates

              Background The study investigated the extent to which approaches to work, workplace climate, stress, burnout and satisfaction with medicine as a career in doctors aged about thirty are predicted by measures of learning style and personality measured five to twelve years earlier when the doctors were applicants to medical school or were medical students. Methods Prospective study of a large cohort of doctors. The participants were first studied when they applied to any of five UK medical schools in 1990. Postal questionnaires were sent to all doctors with a traceable address on the current or a previous Medical Register. The current questionnaire included measures of Approaches to Work, Workplace Climate, stress (General Health Questionnaire), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory), and satisfaction with medicine as a career and personality (Big Five). Previous questionnaires had included measures of learning style (Study Process Questionnaire) and personality. Results Doctors' approaches to work were predicted by study habits and learning styles, both at application to medical school and in the final year. How doctors perceive their workplace climate and workload is predicted both by approaches to work and by measures of stress, burnout and satisfaction with medicine. These characteristics are partially predicted by trait measures of personality taken five years earlier. Stress, burnout and satisfaction also correlate with trait measures of personality taken five years earlier. Conclusions Differences in approach to work and perceived workplace climate seem mainly to reflect stable, long-term individual differences in doctors themselves, reflected in measures of personality and learning style.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                + 44 (0) 1382 383747 , j.s.dowell@dundee.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 1224 437257 , jen.cleland@abdn.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 207 419 5494 , siobhan.fitzpatrick@medschools.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 207 679 5390 , i.mcmanus@ucl.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 207 882 2508 , s.nicholson@qmul.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 207 189 5373 , thomas.oppe@gmc-uk.org
                +44 (0) 207 419 5494 , katie.petty-saphon@medschools.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 1382 383 266 , olga.sierocinskaking@medschools.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 207 189 5373 , daniel.smith@gmc-uk.org
                +44 (0) 207 882 2258 , steve.thornton@qmul.ac.uk
                +44 (0) 207 189 5373 , kirsty.white@gmc-uk.org
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                5 January 2018
                5 January 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9009 9462, GRID grid.416266.1, School of Medicine Deanery, , Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, ; Dundee, DD1 9SY UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7291, GRID grid.7107.1, Institute of Education for Medical and Dental Sciences, , University of Aberdeen, ; West Wing, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
                [3 ]Medical Schools Council, Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9HD UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Psychology and Medical Education, , University College London, ; Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 1133, GRID grid.4868.2, Student Progression & the Centre for Medical Education, , Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, ; QMUL, Room 2.43 Garrod Building, Turner Street, London, E1 2AD UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0490 3696, GRID grid.466745.2, General Medical Council, ; Regents Place, 350 Euston Road, London, NW1 3JN UK
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 1133, GRID grid.4868.2, Health & Obstetrics, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, , QMUL, ; VP (Health) Offices, 2nd Floor, Dean Rees House, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ UK
                Article
                1115
                10.1186/s12909-017-1115-9
                5755333
                29304801
                df9e2825-9d66-47c7-9894-54311b35fb74
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 March 2017
                : 21 December 2017
                Categories
                Correspondence
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Education
                selection,personnel,medical schools,education,medical,graduate,undergraduate,fitness to practise
                Education
                selection, personnel, medical schools, education, medical, graduate, undergraduate, fitness to practise

                Comments

                Comment on this article