9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prospective pulmonary function comparison of open versus endoscopic anterior fusion combined with posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

      Spine
      Adolescent, Anthropometry, Child, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Scoliosis, radiography, surgery, Spinal Fusion, instrumentation, methods, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Thoracic Vertebrae, Thoracotomy, Treatment Outcome, Vital Capacity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prospective clinical study. To evaluate pulmonary function tests at a minimum 2-year follow-up in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing either an endoscopic versus open anterior fusion along with posterior segmental fixation and fusion. A total of 21 patients with AIS underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT group) release/fusion followed by a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and segmental spinal fixation were compared to 16 patients who underwent an open thoracotomy (Open group) followed by a PSF. The mean preoperative thoracic Cobb was 70 degrees in the VAT group versus 75 degrees in the Open group. All patients had preoperative and a minimum 2-year postoperative pulmonary function tests consisting of forced vital capacity (FVC) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV-1). The average thoracic Cobb correction was to 27 degrees (61%) in the VAT group versus 36 degrees (52%) in the Open group. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative FVC in the VAT group averaged 2.48 L and 2.85 L, respectively (P = 0.006). The Open group corresponding results were 1.97 L and 2.43 L, respectively (P = 0.001). Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative FEV-1 in the VAT group averaged 2.06 L and 2.37 L, respectively (P = 0.005). Values for the Open group were 1.65 L and 2.08 L, respectively (P = 0.001). Although both groups had pulmonary function test parameters that were statistically improved postoperative versus preoperative, there were no significant differences comparing the VAT group to the Open group (P > 0.05) VAT versus Open release/anterior fusion in association with a PSF for select AIS curves requiring circumferential treatment both demonstrated similar radiographic and pulmonary function test improvement at 2 years postoperative, with no significant differences seen between the groups.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article