24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19): lessons to be learned by Brazilian Physical Therapists

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) pandemic, also known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), puts us at the forefront of scenarios with serious consequences for health systems in Brazil and in the world. 1 Current viral interstitial pneumonia has resulted in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure, which has resulted in overcrowding in intensive care units (ICUs), shortage of equipment and personnel, and significant mortality, especially in populations at risk who have chronic health conditions. 2 In most countries, the volume of patients has exceeded critical care capacities, with a shortage of personal protection equipment, multi-professional teams, and mechanical ventilators dominating the discussions in local hospitals and in the media.3, 4 While COVID-19 brought several challenges to the overall health care system, it also specifically highlighted the need for physical therapists to be properly trained and prepared to respond to such pandemic. First, it demonstrated the importance for every professional being updated, trained, and qualified in all technical skills related to infection control strategies such as wearing adequate professional clothing, effective hand washing, and use of personal protective equipment. Second, the importance of primary care in a good health care system. Patients with at least one comorbidity have higher odds of being hospitalized and being in ICUs. Also, individuals with chronic health conditions are more likely to develop a more severe form of the disease requiring ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and more resources. Hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes are the most common comorbidities in patients who died from COVID-19. 5 Consequently, the mortality rate (6.4%) of confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Brazil, within 52 days from the beginning of COVID-19 in every country, is around twice that of other countries, like Germany and Canada (3.0% and 4.1%, respectively), where the primary health care system is more effective in providing primary care.6, 7, 8 Thus, countries that have greater control over chronic health conditions may consequently have a lower mortality rate, with a population in better health being an important benefit in pandemic situations like the one we are witnessing with COVID-19. Third, the importance of the Cardiorespiratory and Intensivists (CRI) Physical Therapists in the Brazilian health system. CRI Physical Therapy is an established profession worldwide; however, the number of professionals in Brazil is much higher, and dozens of thousands work in hospitals. Interestingly, the ventilatory support and the improvement in musculoskeletal dysfunctions in ICUs are assisted by two professionals (Physical Therapists and Respiratory Therapists) in most countries; however, the CRI Physical Therapists are responsible for both in Brazil. The cumulative function reinforces the importance of the CRI Physical Therapists in the ICUs, as part of the multiprofessional team, minimizing the consequences of hospitalization and facilitating the recovery of patients. Ventilatory support in patients with COVID-19 includes several approaches: assistance in orotracheal intubation, support and management in mechanical ventilation, removal of airway secretion, changing patient's decubitus to improve gas exchange, and weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. 9 Additionally, these patients can present with consequences due to intensive care syndrome, including prolonged intubation, continuous sedation, and use of neuromuscular blocking agents that result in muscle weakness. 10 All these consequences from prolonged stay in the ICU are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. 11 Therefore, it is essential to start early rehabilitation in the ICU to promote rapid functional recovery. Some of these patients will present low exercise capacity, low physical activity level, increased sedentary behavior, dyspnea on exertion, and poorer quality of life after hospital discharge. CRI Physical Therapists will also be requested to help with the post hospital discharge rehabilitation program. Fourth and finally, this pandemic reinforces the importance for physical therapists to remain scientifically updated. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant increase in the number of studies reporting the impact of the disease 9 ; despite that, the pulmonary repercussion of the disease remains poorly known. 12 The difficulty in understanding how to offer optimal ventilatory support was the primary barrier for the CRI Physical Therapists. The previous professional experience was to administer ventilatory support for pneumonia based on the pathophysiology of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), where the severity of hypoxemia is associated with lung compliance. However, in COVID-19, CRI Physical Therapists faced, at least, two distinct phenotypes. Some patients present severe hypoxemia with respiratory system compliance remaining near normal, where hypoxemia seems to occur due to the loss of the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and impaired regulation of pulmonary blood flow. In another group of patients, severe hypoxemia is associated with lower compliance values, a condition similar to severe ARDS. 12 The difference between COVID-19 and ARDS required CRI Physical Therapists to be updated almost daily to understand how to give the proper ventilatory support. In conclusion, COVID-19 imposed a huge impact on the health care system in all countries, and everyone had to respond promptly in a very short time. Brazilian hospitals entire buildings and wards have been converted in semi-intensive and ICUs, and multidisciplinary teams, including CRI Physical Therapists, Physicians, and Nurses, have to receive special training for COVID-19. The Brazilian health system presents a special environment because it can count on the presence of CRI Physical Therapists as part of the ICUs multidisciplinary team. However, this is a unique moment in human history, and the countries that have adequately invested in research, the entire health care system, and hospital infrastructure are those that will suffer less in this war. Funding Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq). Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes?

          The Surviving Sepsis Campaign panel recently recommended that “mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 should be managed similarly to other patients with acute respiratory failure in the ICU [1].” Yet, COVID-19 pneumonia [2], despite falling in most of the circumstances under the Berlin definition of ARDS [3], is a specific disease, whose distinctive features are severe hypoxemia often associated with near normal respiratory system compliance (more than 50% of the 150 patients measured by the authors and further confirmed by several colleagues in Northern Italy). This remarkable combination is almost never seen in severe ARDS. These severely hypoxemic patients despite sharing a single etiology (SARS-CoV-2) may present quite differently from one another: normally breathing (“silent” hypoxemia) or remarkably dyspneic; quite responsive to nitric oxide or not; deeply hypocapnic or normo/hypercapnic; and either responsive to prone position or not. Therefore, the same disease actually presents itself with impressive non-uniformity. Based on detailed observation of several cases and discussions with colleagues treating these patients, we hypothesize that the different COVID-19 patterns found at presentation in the emergency department depend on the interaction between three factors: (1) the severity of the infection, the host response, physiological reserve and comorbidities; (2) the ventilatory responsiveness of the patient to hypoxemia; (3) the time elapsed between the onset of the disease and the observation in the hospital. The interaction between these factors leads to the development of a time-related disease spectrum within two primary “phenotypes”: Type L, characterized by Low elastance (i.e., high compliance), Low ventilation-to-perfusion ratio, Low lung weight and Low recruitability and Type H, characterized by High elastance, High right-to-left shunt, High lung weight and High recruitability. COVID-19 pneumonia, Type L At the beginning, COVID-19 pneumonia presents with the following characteristics: Low elastance. The nearly normal compliance indicates that the amount of gas in the lung is nearly normal [4]. Low ventilation-to-perfusion (VA/Q) ratio. Since the gas volume is nearly normal, hypoxemia may be best explained by the loss of regulation of perfusion and by loss of hypoxic vasoconstriction. Accordingly, at this stage, the pulmonary artery pressure should be near normal. Low lung weight. Only ground-glass densities are present on CT scan, primarily located subpleurally and along the lung fissures. Consequently, lung weight is only moderately increased. Low lung recruitability. The amount of non-aerated tissue is very low; consequently, the recruitability is low [5]. To conceptualize these phenomena, we hypothesize the following sequence of events: the viral infection leads to a modest local subpleural interstitial edema (ground-glass lesions) particularly located at the interfaces between lung structures with different elastic properties, where stress and strain are concentrated [6]. Vasoplegia accounts for severe hypoxemia. The normal response to hypoxemia is to increase minute ventilation, primarily by increasing the tidal volume [7] (up to 15–20 ml/kg), which is associated with a more negative intrathoracic inspiratory pressure. Undetermined factors other than hypoxemia markedly stimulate, in these patients, the respiratory drive. The near normal compliance, however, explains why some of the patients present without dyspnea as the patient inhales the volume he expects. This increase in minute ventilation leads to a decrease in PaCO2. The evolution of the disease: transitioning between phenotypes The Type L patients may remain unchanging for a period and then improve or worsen. The possible key feature which determines the evolution of the disease, other than the severity of the disease itself, is the depth of the negative intrathoracic pressure associated with the increased tidal volume in spontaneous breathing. Indeed, the combination of a negative inspiratory intrathoracic pressure and increased lung permeability due to inflammation results in interstitial lung edema. This phenomenon, initially described by Barach in [8] and Mascheroni in [9] both in an experimental setting, has been recently recognized as the leading cause of patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) [10]. Over time, the increased edema increases lung weight, superimposed pressure and dependent atelectasis. When lung edema reaches a certain magnitude, the gas volume in the lung decreases, and the tidal volumes generated for a given inspiratory pressure decrease [11]. At this stage, dyspnea develops, which in turn leads to worsening P-SILI. The transition from Type L to Type H may be due to the evolution of the COVID-19 pneumonia on one hand and the injury attributable to high-stress ventilation on the other. COVID-19 pneumonia, Type H The Type H patient: High elastance. The decrease in gas volume due to increased edema accounts for the increased lung elastance. High right-to-left shunt. This is due to the fraction of cardiac output perfusing the non-aerated tissue which develops in the dependent lung regions due to the increased edema and superimposed pressure. High lung weight. Quantitative analysis of the CT scan shows a remarkable increase in lung weight (> 1.5 kg), on the order of magnitude of severe ARDS [12]. High lung recruitability. The increased amount of non-aerated tissue is associated, as in severe ARDS, with increased recruitability [5]. The Type H pattern, 20–30% of patients in our series, fully fits the severe ARDS criteria: hypoxemia, bilateral infiltrates, decreased the respiratory system compliance, increased lung weight and potential for recruitment. Figure 1 summarizes the time course we described. In panel a, we show the CT in spontaneous breathing of a Type L patient at admission, and in panel b, its transition in Type H after 7 days of noninvasive support. As shown, a similar degree of hypoxemia was associated with different patterns in lung imaging. Fig. 1 a CT scan acquired during spontaneous breathing. The cumulative distribution of the CT number is shifted to the left (well-aerated compartments), being the 0 to − 100 HU compartment, the non-aerated tissue virtually 0. Indeed, the total lung tissue weight was 1108 g, 7.8% of which was not aerated and the gas volume was 4228 ml. Patient receiving oxygen with venturi mask inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8. b CT acquired during mechanical ventilation at end-expiratory pressure at 5 cmH2O of PEEP. The cumulative distribution of the CT scan is shifted to the right (non-aerated compartments), while the left compartments are greatly reduced. Indeed, the total lung tissue weight was 2744 g, 54% of which was not aerated and the gas volume was 1360 ml. The patient was ventilated in volume controlled mode, 7.8 ml/kg of tidal volume, respiratory rate of 20 breaths per minute, inspired oxygen fraction of 0.7 Respiratory treatment Given this conceptual model, it follows that the respiratory treatment offered to Type L and Type H patients must be different. The proposed treatment is consistent with what observed in COVID-19, even though the overwhelming number of patients seen in this pandemic may limit its wide applicability. The first step to reverse hypoxemia is through an increase in FiO2 to which the Type L patient responds well, particularly if not yet breathless. In Type L patients with dyspnea, several noninvasive options are available: high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). At this stage, the measurement (or the estimation) of the inspiratory esophageal pressure swings is crucial [13]. In the absence of the esophageal manometry, surrogate measures of work of breathing, such as the swings of central venous pressure [14] or clinical detection of excessive inspiratory effort, should be assessed. In intubated patients, the P0.1 and P occlusion should also be determined. High PEEP, in some patients, may decrease the pleural pressure swings and stop the vicious cycle that exacerbates lung injury. However, high PEEP in patients with normal compliance may have detrimental effects on hemodynamics. In any case, noninvasive options are questionable, as they may be associated with high failure rates and delayed intubation, in a disease which typically lasts several weeks. The magnitude of inspiratory pleural pressures swings may determine the transition from the Type L to the Type H phenotype. As esophageal pressure swings increase from 5 to 10 cmH2O—which are generally well tolerated—to above 15 cmH2O, the risk of lung injury increases and therefore intubation should be performed as soon as possible. Once intubated and deeply sedated, the Type L patients, if hypercapnic, can be ventilated with volumes greater than 6 ml/kg (up to 8–9 ml/kg), as the high compliance results in tolerable strain without the risk of VILI. Prone positioning should be used only as a rescue maneuver, as the lung conditions are “too good” for the prone position effectiveness, which is based on improved stress and strain redistribution. The PEEP should be reduced to 8–10 cmH2O, given that the recruitability is low and the risk of hemodynamic failure increases at higher levels. An early intubation may avert the transition to Type H phenotype. Type H patients should be treated as severe ARDS, including higher PEEP, if compatible with hemodynamics, prone positioning and extracorporeal support. In conclusion, Type L and Type H patients are best identified by CT scan and are affected by different pathophysiological mechanisms. If not available, signs which are implicit in Type L and Type H definition could be used as surrogates: respiratory system elastance and recruitability. Understanding the correct pathophysiology is crucial to establishing the basis for appropriate treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A Systematic Review of COVID-19 Epidemiology Based on Current Evidence

            As the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread rapidly across the globe, we aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence on epidemiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and the effectiveness of control measures to inform policymakers and leaders in formulating management guidelines, and to provide directions for future research. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature and preprints on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak following predefined eligibility criteria. Of 317 research articles generated from our initial search on PubMed and preprint archives on 21 February 2020, 41 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Current evidence suggests that it takes about 3-7 days for the epidemic to double in size. Of 21 estimates for the basic reproduction number ranging from 1.9 to 6.5, 13 were between 2.0 and 3.0. The incubation period was estimated to be 4-6 days, whereas the serial interval was estimated to be 4-8 days. Though the true case fatality risk is yet unknown, current model-based estimates ranged from 0.3% to 1.4% for outside China. There is an urgent need for rigorous research focusing on the mitigation efforts to minimize the impact on society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Respiratory physiotherapy in patients with COVID-19 infection in acute setting: a Position Paper of the Italian Association of Respiratory Physiotherapists (ARIR)

              Respiratory physiotherapy in patients with COVID-19 infection in acute setting: a Position Paper of the Italian Association of Respiratory Physiotherapists (ARIR) On February 2020, Italy, especially the northern regions, was hit by an epidemic of the new SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus that spread from China between December 2019 and January 2020. The entire healthcare system had to respond promptly in a very short time to an exponential growth of the number of subjects affected by COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) with the need of semi-intensive and intensive care units.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Braz J Phys Ther
                Braz J Phys Ther
                Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
                Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
                1413-3555
                1809-9246
                1 May 2020
                May-June 2020
                1 May 2020
                : 24
                : 3
                : 185-186
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
                [b ]Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, SP, Brazil
                [c ]Department of Physical Therapy, Centro Universitário das Américas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
                [d ]São Paulo Coordinator from the Associação Brasileira de Fisioterapia Cardiorrespiratória e Terapia Intensiva (Assobrafir), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Cipotânea, 51, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 05360-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. cscarval@ 123456usp.br
                Article
                S1413-3555(20)30397-X
                10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.004
                7252009
                32387006
                dfce8bc7-d182-43f2-847a-917ef7389c06
                © 2020 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article