0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      4CPS-220 Clinical pharmacist interventions in hospitalised patients with renal impairment

      meeting-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The need for dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment is well known. Despite globally implemented interventions for improvement in dose adjustment, there is dazing noncompliance to dosing recommendations in renal impairment, which came into focus in the 21 st century.

          Purpose

          To determine the degree of drug dose adjustment in hospitalised patients with renal impairment, frequency and type of drugs that need to be adjusted with regard to creatinine clearance (CrCl). To assess the acceptance rate of the clinical pharmacist interventions addressed to doctors.

          Material and methods

          Prospective interventional study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine during a 3 month period. Using the Cockroft–Gault equation, patients with renal impairment were identified at admission and their pharmacotherapy were reviewed daily. Prescribed drugs which required dose adjustment in renal impairment were classified as adjusted or unadjusted. For the latter, written pharmaceutical intervention was sent to the concerned doctor.

          Results

          Almost one-third of all admitted patients had CrCl <60 mL/min at admission. Three hundred and nine patients were included in the study, with 99 (32%) patients having at least one unadjusted drug. Out of 514 prescriptions which required dose adjustment 148 (28.5%) were not adjusted. Patients with CrCl <15 mL/min and those who died had the highest percentage of unadjusted drugs, 53% and 44%, respecitvely. The C group of drugs and the J group had the most of the total number of unadjusted prescriptions with 55% and 29%, respectively. The highest proportion of drugs not in agreement with the recommendations were within the J group with 52%, and they were followed by the C and A group, with 33% each. Overall, 123 pharmaceutical interventions were made, out of which 50 (40.6%) were accepted and 73 (59.4%) were unaccepted. Twenty-five interventions were not sent, which totals 16.9% of the total number of improperly dosed drugs.

          Conclusion

          Nearly every third admitted patient had impaired renal function. Frequent dose unadjustments increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. Clinical pharmacists can increase the rate of proper dose adjustments in patients with renal impairment. The implementation of systemically provided pharmaceutical care in hospital wards can facilitate positive treatment outcomes and increase patient safety.

          References and/or Acknowledgements

          Many thanks to Professor Vesna Bačić Vrca

          No conflict of interest

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Eur J Hosp Pharm
          Eur J Hosp Pharm
          ejhpharm
          ejhpharm
          European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
          BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
          2047-9956
          2047-9964
          2018
          2 March 2018
          : 25
          : Suppl 1 , Abstract Book, 23rd EAHP Congress, 21st–23rd March 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden
          : A144
          Affiliations
          1University Hospital Dubrava, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Zagreb, Croatia
          2University Hospital Dubrava, Department of Internal medicine, Nephrology, Zagreb, Croatia
          Article
          PMC7535329 PMC7535329 7535329 ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.310
          10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.310
          7535329
          dfe20e97-8db6-48c9-82eb-7191570652e5
          © 2018, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
          History
          Categories
          Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services

          Comments

          Comment on this article