12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An open trial of individualized face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychological distress in parents of children after end of treatment for childhood cancer including a cognitive behavioral conceptualization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          A subgroup of parents of children who have been treated for childhood cancer report high levels of psychological distress. To date there is no empirically supported psychological treatment targeting cancer-related psychological distress in this population. The aim of the current study was to test the feasibility and preliminarily evaluate the effect of individualized face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for parents of children after the end of treatment for childhood cancer. A secondary aim was to present a cognitive behavioral conceptualization of cancer-related distress for these parents.

          Methods

          An open trial was conducted where 15 parents of children who had completed successful treatment for cancer three months to five years earlier and who reported psychological distress related to a child’s previous cancer disease were provided CBT at a maximum of 15 sessions. Participants were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up using self-reported psychological distress (including posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), depression, and anxiety) and the diagnostic Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Feasibility outcomes relating to recruitment, data collection, and delivery of the treatment were also examined. Individual case formulations for each participant guided the intervention and these were aggregated and presented in a conceptualization detailing core symptoms and their suggested maintenance mechanisms.

          Results

          A total of 93% of the participants completed the treatment and all of them completed the follow-up assessment. From baseline to post-assessment, parents reported significant improvements in PTSS, depression, and anxiety with medium to large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 0.65–0.92). Results were maintained or improved at a three-month follow-up. At baseline, seven (47%) participants fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder and four (29%) fulfilled the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder, compared to none at a post-assessment and a follow-up assessment. The resulting cognitive behavioral conceptualization suggests traumatic stress and depression as the core features of distress, and avoidance and inactivity is suggested as the core maintenance mechanisms.

          Conclusion

          The treatment was feasible and acceptable to the participants. Significant improvements in distress were observed during the study. Overall, results suggest that the psychological treatment for parents of children after end of treatment for childhood cancer used in the current study is promising and should be tested and evaluated in future studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes.

          I propose that the ways people respond to their own symptoms of depression influence the duration of these symptoms. People who engage in ruminative responses to depression, focusing on their symptoms and the possible causes and consequences of their symptoms, will show longer depressions than people who take action to distract themselves from their symptoms. Ruminative responses prolong depression because they allow the depressed mood to negatively bias thinking and interfere with instrumental behavior and problem-solving. Laboratory and field studies directly testing this theory have supported its predictions. I discuss how response styles can explain the greater likelihood of depression in women than men. Then I intergrate this response styles theory with studies of coping with discrete events. The response styles theory is compared to other theories of the duration of depression. Finally, I suggest what may help a depressed person to stop engaging in ruminative responses and how response styles for depression may develop.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Experimental avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.

            Syndromal classification is a well-developed diagnostic system but has failed to deliver on its promise of the identification of functional pathological processes. Functional analysis is tightly connected to treatment but has failed to develop testable, replicable classification systems. Functional diagnostic dimensions are suggested as a way to develop the functional classification approach, and experiential avoidance is described as 1 such dimension. A wide range of research is reviewed showing that many forms of psychopathology can be conceptualized as unhealthy efforts to escape and avoid emotions, thoughts, memories, and other private experiences. It is argued that experiential avoidance, as a functional diagnostic dimension, has the potential to integrate the efforts and findings of researchers from a wide variety of theoretical paradigms, research interests, and clinical domains and to lead to testable new approaches to the analysis and treatment of behavioral disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A new self-rating scale for depression and anxiety states based on the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                11 April 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : e4570
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
                [2 ] Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ] Pediatric Oncology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
                Article
                4570
                10.7717/peerj.4570
                5899418
                29666751
                dfe36935-ae1e-4d50-902a-5291a2b75e5f
                © 2018 Ljungman et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 18 August 2017
                : 14 March 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Swedish Research Council
                Award ID: VR521-2010-3042; VR521-2014-3337, PI Louise von Essen
                Funded by: Swedish Cancer Society
                Award ID: CAN2013/580; CAN2014/613, PI Louise von Essen
                This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (grant numbers: VR521-2010-3042; VR521-2014-3337, PI Louise von Essen) and the Swedish Cancer Society (grant numbers: CAN2013/580; CAN2014/613, PI Louise von Essen). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Clinical Trials
                Oncology
                Pediatrics
                Psychiatry and Psychology

                cognitive behavior therapy,cancer,children,parents,trial,posttraumatic stress,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article