Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

2D and 3D assessment of neuropathology in rat brain after prenatal exposure to methylazoxymethanol, a model for developmental neurotoxicty.

Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.y.)

methods, Toxicity Tests, toxicity, Teratogens, Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms, Rats, Wistar, Rats, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Pregnancy, drug effects, Organ Size, analogs & derivatives, Methylazoxymethanol Acetate, adverse effects, Maternal Exposure, Male, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Female, Cell Count, pathology, abnormalities, Brain, Animals, Outbred Strains, Animals, Abnormalities, Drug-Induced

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      To evaluate the ability of a tiered quantitative morphological approach to reveal developmental neurotoxicity, morphometric parameters were measured in the offspring of rats treated with methylazoxymethanol (MAM) during days 13-15 of pregnancy. Treatment was aimed at inhibiting the proliferation phase of hippocampal neurons while leaving cerebellar neurons unaffected. 2D and 3D assessment of brain morphology combined with straightforward measurement of brain size, weight and volume, and the usefulness of estimation of total neuron numbers were studied. Each tier indicated major effects of MAM, from macroscopic effects in the cerebrum (first tier) to a considerable loss of neurons in the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal layer (third tier). The cerebellum and the number of cerebellar granular neurons were not changed. Along with each step of the proposed tiered approach (brain size-->linear morphometry-->stereology), the discriminative strength of the endpoints, and thus the probability to pinpoint the extent and location of developmental brain lesions increased.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1016/j.reprotox.2005.04.006
      15964739

      Comments

      Comment on this article