67
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Benefits of Phoneme Discrimination Training in a Randomized Controlled Trial of 50- to 74-Year-Olds With Mild Hearing Loss

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the efficacy of phoneme discrimination training for hearing and cognitive abilities of adults aged 50 to 74 years with mild sensorineural hearing loss who were not users of hearing aids, and to (ii) determine participant compliance with a self-administered, computer-delivered, home- and game-based auditory training program.

          Design:

          This study was a randomized controlled trial with repeated measures and crossover design. Participants were trained and tested over an 8- to 12-week period. One group (Immediate Training) trained during weeks 1 and 4. A second waitlist group (Delayed Training) did no training during weeks 1 and 4, but then trained during weeks 5 and 8. On-task (phoneme discrimination) and transferable outcome measures (speech perception, cognition, self-report of hearing disability) for both groups were obtained during weeks 0, 4, and 8, and for the Delayed Training group only at week 12.

          Results:

          Robust phoneme discrimination learning was found for both groups, with the largest improvements in threshold shown for those with the poorest initial thresholds. Between weeks 1 and 4, the Immediate Training group showed moderate, significant improvements on self-report of hearing disability, divided attention, and working memory, specifically for conditions or situations that were more complex and therefore more challenging. Training did not result in consistent improvements in speech perception in noise. There was no evidence of any test-retest effects between weeks 1 and 4 for the Delayed Training group. Retention of benefit at 4 weeks post-training was shown for phoneme discrimination, divided attention, working memory, and self-report of hearing disability. Improved divided attention and reduced self-reported hearing difficulties were highly correlated.

          Conclusions:

          It was observed that phoneme discrimination training benefits some but not all people with mild hearing loss. Evidence presented here, together with that of other studies that used different training stimuli, suggests that auditory training may facilitate cognitive skills that index executive function and the self-perception of hearing difficulty in challenging situations. The development of cognitive skills may be more important than the development of sensory skills for improving communication and speech perception in everyday life. However, improvements were modest. Outcome measures need to be appropriately challenging to be sensitive to the effects of the relatively small amount of training performed.

          Abstract

          The efficacy of phoneme discrimination training for enhancing hearing and related cognitive abilities in a typical, pre–hearing aid population was evaluated. Significant and robust on-task learning was demonstrated. Benefits of training were seen in reduced hearing disability, particularly in complex listening environments, and in improved attention and working memory. These benefits were retained for at least 4 weeks posttraining. Compliance with home-delivered training was high. Auditory training thus provided modest benefit for complex and challenging skills that are relevant for listening in realistic environments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Practical statistics for medical research. Douglas G. Altman, Chapman and Hall, London, 1991. No. of pages: 611. Price: £32.00

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study.

            To investigate the efficacy of a novel brain plasticity-based computerized cognitive training program in older adults and to evaluate the effect on untrained measures of memory and attention and participant-reported outcomes. Multisite randomized controlled double-blind trial with two treatment groups. Communities in northern and southern California and Minnesota. Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (N=487) without a diagnosis of clinically significant cognitive impairment. Participants were randomized to receive a broadly-available brain plasticity-based computerized cognitive training program (intervention) or a novelty- and intensity-matched general cognitive stimulation program modeling treatment as usual (active control). Duration of training was 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks, for a total of 40 hours. The primary outcome was a composite score calculated from six subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status that use the auditory modality (RBANS Auditory Memory/Attention). Secondary measures were derived from performance on the experimental program, standardized neuropsychological assessments of memory and attention, and participant-reported outcomes. RBANS Auditory Memory/Attention improvement was significantly greater (P=.02) in the experimental group (3.9 points, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-5.1) than in the control group (1.8 points, 95% CI=0.6-3.0). Multiple secondary measures of memory and attention showed significantly greater improvements in the experimental group (word list total score, word list delayed recall, digits backwards, letter-number sequencing; P<.05), as did the participant-reported outcome measure (P=.001). No advantage for the experimental group was seen in narrative memory. The experimental program improved generalized measures of memory and attention more than an active control program.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Scienses

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ear Hear
                Ear Hear
                AUD
                Ear and Hearing
                Williams And Wilkins
                0196-0202
                1538-4667
                July 2014
                23 June 2014
                : 35
                : 4
                : e110-e121
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom; [2 ]Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and [3 ]Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Melanie Ferguson, NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, United Kingdom NG1 5DU. E-mail: melanie.ferguson@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk
                Article
                00013
                10.1097/AUD.0000000000000020
                4072445
                24752284
                e046b9cc-d251-4c0b-87c1-c02d401bf9f3
                Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

                History
                Categories
                e-Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                ONLINE-ONLY
                TRUE

                auditory,cognition,learning,speech perception,training
                auditory, cognition, learning, speech perception, training

                Comments

                Comment on this article