38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Dapsone Therapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Series of 24 Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease with a chronic intermittent course. HS is difficult to treat, and the evidence for the effect of most treatments consists of smaller open studies. The use of dapsone in the treatment of HS is based on a few published cases successfully treated. Objective: To evaluate the potential of dapsone treatment for HS in an open case series. Methods: An exploratory and retrospective review of case notes from HS patients treated with dapsone was performed. Patients were included irrespective of treatment outcome. Prior to the treatment the level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the blood was tested for all patients. Results: A total of 24 HS patients were included and treated with dapsone. Improvement was seen in 9 out of 24 (38%) treated patients, whereas 15 out of 24 (62%) did not experience any improvement. None of the 4 cases with severe disease experienced improvement. Side effects leading to discontinuation of the treatment occurred in 2 of 24 patients (8%). Recurrence of disease at the cessation of treatment was described as rapid. Limitations: The study is limited by lacking a control group. Conclusion: Therapy with dapsone for patients with HS is possible, particularly in milder cases. The effect may be due to either antibacterial or anti-inflammatory effects of the drug, or both. Rapid recurrence after stopping treatment however suggests that anti-inflammatory effects may predominate. The effect appears to be smaller than that reported with combination therapy using clindamycin and rifampicin. To clarify the true effect of dapsone future randomized controlled trials are necessary.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa and its potential precursor lesions.

          The morbidity of hidradenitis suppurativa can be considerable, but little is known about its epidemiology. Our purpose was to describe the 1-year and point prevalences of hidradenitis suppurativa and its potential precursor lesions. We obtained the histories and examined an unselected sample (599 persons) of the general population (1-year prevalence), and we performed physical examinations for a consecutive sample of 507 persons undergoing screening for sexually transmitted diseases (point prevalence). The point prevalence was 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.0-6.0) on the basis of objective findings. The 1-year prevalence of hidradenitis was 1.0% (CI = 0.4-2.2) on the basis of subject recollection only. The patients in the sample on which point prevalence is based were younger than those in the unselected sample of the general population (p < 0.001). Hidradenitis was significantly more common in women (p = 0.037), which may result from a female preponderance of genitofemoral lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 5.4; CI = 1.5 - 19.3). No sex difference was found in the prevalence of axillary lesions. Hidradenitis suppurativa is significantly more common than hitherto estimated. The female preponderance of patients is confirmed, except for patients with axillary lesions. Additional longitudinal studies are necessary to assess the importance of potential precursor lesions such as noninflamed nodules or comedones.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hidradenitis suppurativa.

            J Revuz (2009)
            Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic disease characterized by recurrent, painful, deep-seated, rounded nodules and abscesses of apocrine gland-bearing skin. Subsequent suppuration, sinus tracts and hypertrophic scarring are its main features. Onset is usually after puberty, although it is most common during the third decade and may persist in old age. The disease tends to be chronic and may develop to subcutaneous extension leading to indurations, sinus, and fistula having a profound impact on the quality of life. The prevalence is 1% in several studies. Axillary and inguinal involvement is more common in females; peri-anal and buttocks localizations are prevalent in males. The exact aetiology remains unknown. The primary event is a follicular occlusion with secondary inflammation, infection and destruction of the pilo-sebaceo-apocrine apparatus and extension to the adjacent sub-cutaneous tissue. Infection is common. Smoking may be a triggering factor. Obesity aggravates the discomfort. Differential diagnostic includes Crohn's disease, nodular acne and furonculosis. The main complications are arthropathy, carcinoma. Treatment depends upon the stage of the disease. Early nodular lesions may be treated by antibiotics for acute stage; long-term antibiotics, zinc salts may be useful as maintenance treatment; anti-TNF drugs have been used in severe cases; systemic steroids, estrogens, anti-androgens, retinoids have been used as options with limited success. Surgical treatment includes incision with or without drainage for limited abscesses; limited excisions are used for locally recurring draining sinuses. Total wide excision and healing with secondary intention or flaps and grafts is the only curative procedure in case of advanced disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Topical clindamycin versus systemic tetracycline in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.

              Antibiotics are often used to treat hidradenitis, but only topical clindamycin has been shown to be effective in a randomized controlled trial. The paucity of these trials may be the result of difficulties in disease assessment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DRM
                Dermatology
                10.1159/issn.1018-8665
                Dermatology
                S. Karger AG
                1018-8665
                1421-9832
                2011
                September 2011
                12 July 2011
                : 222
                : 4
                : 342-346
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Dermatology, Roskilde Hospital, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark; bDepartment of Dermatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands; cDepartment of Dermatology, University of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway; dDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
                Author notes
                *Shiva Yazdanyar, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Roskilde Hospital, Køgevej 7–13, DK–4000 Roskilde (Denmark), E-Mail shiva.yazdanyar@gmail.com
                Article
                329023 Dermatology 2011;222:342–346
                10.1159/000329023
                21757878
                e053d271-2e90-425e-b5cd-aef958387a8f
                © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 31 March 2011
                : 16 April 2011
                Page count
                Tables: 2, Pages: 5
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Dermatology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Hidradenitis suppurativa, retrospective study,Dapsone therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article