8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Assessing Individual Differences in Basic Computer Skills : Psychometric Characteristics of an Interactive Performance Measure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A definition of basic computer skills (BCS) is proposed and the psychometric properties of a newly developed BCS scale are investigated. BCS is defined as the ability and speed of performing basic actions in graphical user interfaces of computers to access, collect, and provide information. BCS is thus considered a basic component skill of the much broader construct of ICT literacy. Data from the German PISA 2009 field trial was used to determine the factor structure of the BCS scale as well as convergent and discriminant validity. The latent factor structure underlying the BCS scale was investigated by testing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models for response times and responses. CFA results suggest that there is one dimension of BCS speed and BCS ability, respectively. With respect to convergent validity, practical computer knowledge and skill in digital reading had strong associations with BCS speed and ability. With respect to discriminant validity, only moderate associations were found with lower level reading skills and self-reported computer skills. Differences between BCS speed and ability and further developments of the BCS scale are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Some Guidelines Concerning the Modeling of Traits and Abilities in Test Construction

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Self-regulation in error management training: emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects.

            In error management training, participants are explicitly encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Error management training has frequently been shown to lead to better performance than conventional trainings that adopt an error avoidant approach. The present study investigated self-regulatory processes mediating this effect. Fifty-five volunteer students learned a computer program under 1 of 3 conditions: error avoidant training, error management training, or error management training supplemented with a metacognitive module. As predicted, both forms of error management training led to better transfer performance than did error avoidant training (d = 0.75). Mediation hypotheses were fully supported: Emotion control and metacognitive activity (from verbal protocols) mediated performance differences. These findings highlight the potential of promoting self-regulatory processing during training. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jpa
                European Journal of Psychological Assessment
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1015-5759
                2151-2426
                October 2012
                2013
                : 29
                : 4
                : 263-275
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB), Frankfurt, Germany
                Author notes
                Frank Goldhammer, German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Schloßstr. 29, 60486 Frankfurt/Main, Germany, +49 69 2470-8323, +49 69 2470-8444, goldhammer@ 123456dipf.de
                Article
                jpa_29_4_263
                10.1027/1015-5759/a000153
                e060c484-8d2a-4423-ae50-81e19b990d71
                Copyright @ 2012
                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General behavioral science
                speed,interactive performance scale,ability,convergent and discriminant validity,basic computer skills

                Comments

                Comment on this article