15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs: what is next after the demise of recombinant human activated protein C?*.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The developmental pipeline for novel therapeutics to treat sepsis has diminished to a trickle compared to previous years of sepsis research. While enormous strides have been made in understanding the basic molecular mechanisms that underlie the pathophysiology of sepsis, a long list of novel agents have now been tested in clinical trials without a single immunomodulating therapy showing consistent benefit. The only antisepsis agent to successfully complete a phase III clinical trial was human recumbent activated protein C. This drug was taken off the market after a follow-up placebo-controlled trial (human recombinant activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation of Severe Sepsis and septic Shock [PROWESS SHOCK]) failed to replicate the favorable results of the initial registration trial performed ten years earlier. We must critically reevaluate our basic approach to the preclinical and clinical evaluation of new sepsis therapies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Crit. Care Med.
          Critical care medicine
          1530-0293
          0090-3493
          Jul 2014
          : 42
          : 7
          Affiliations
          [1 ] 1Infectious Disease Division, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. 2Critical Care Department, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ. 3Critical Care Department, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. 4Critical Care Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 5Critical Care Department, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
          Article
          NIHMS609803
          10.1097/CCM.0000000000000325
          24717456
          e071b8e8-1509-40b8-8921-7dda9a95c35d
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article