11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Electronic care coordination systems for people with advanced progressive illness: a mixed-methods evaluation in Scottish primary care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Electronic care coordination systems, known as the Key Information Summary (KIS) in Scotland, enable the creation of shared electronic records available across healthcare settings. A KIS provides clinicians with essential information to guide decision making for people likely to need emergency or out-of-hours care.

          Aim

          To estimate the proportion of people with an advanced progressive illness with a KIS by the time of death, to examine when planning information is documented, and suggest improvements for electronic care coordination systems.

          Design and setting

          This was a mixed-methods study involving 18 diverse general practices in Scotland.

          Method

          Retrospective review of medical records of patients who died in 2017, and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted.

          Results

          Data on 1304 decedents were collected. Of those with an advanced progressive illness (79%, n = 1034), 69% ( n = 712) had a KIS. These were started a median of 45 weeks before death. People with cancer were most likely to have a KIS (80%, n = 288), and those with organ failure least likely (47%, n = 125). Overall, 68% ( n = 482) of KIS included resuscitation status and 55% ( n = 390) preferred place of care. People with a KIS were more likely to die in the community compared to those without one (61% versus 30%). Most KIS were considered useful/highly useful. Up-to-date free-text information within the KIS was valued highly.

          Conclusion

          In Scotland, most people with an advanced progressive illness have an electronic care coordination record by the time of death. This is an achievement. To improve further, better informal carer information, regular updating, and a focus on generating a KIS for people with organ failure is warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Managing uncertainty in advanced liver disease: a qualitative, multiperspective, serial interview study

              Objective To understand the experiences and support needs of people with advanced liver disease and those of their lay and professional carers to inform improvements in the supportive and palliative care of this rapidly growing but currently neglected patient group. Design Multiperspective, serial interviews. We conducted up to three qualitative in-depth interviews with each patient and lay carer over 12 months and single interviews with case-linked healthcare professionals. Data were analysed using grounded theory techniques. Participants Patients with advanced liver disease of diverse aetiologies recruited from an inpatient hepatology ward, and their lay carers and case-linked healthcare professionals nominated by the patients. Setting Primary and secondary care in South-East Scotland. Results 37 participants (15 patients, 11 lay and 11 professional carers) completed 51 individual and 13 joint patient-carer interviews. Nine patients died during the study. Uncertainty dominated experiences throughout the course of the illness, across patients’ considerable physical, psychological, social and existential needs and affected patients, lay carers and professionals. This related to the nature of the condition, the unpredictability of physical deterioration and prognosis, poor communication and information-sharing, and complexities of care. The pervasive uncertainty also shaped patients’ and lay carers’ strategies for coping and impeded care planning. While patients’ acute medical care was usually well coordinated, their ongoing care lacked structure and focus. Conclusions Living, dying and caring in advanced liver disease is dominated by pervasive, enduring and universally shared uncertainty. In the face of high levels of multidimensional patient distress, professionals must acknowledge this uncertainty in constructive ways that value its contribution to the person's coping approach. Pervasive uncertainty makes anticipatory care planning in advanced liver disease challenging, but planning ‘just in case’ is vital to ensure that patients receive timely and appropriate supportive and palliative care alongside effective management of this unpredictable illness.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Research lead
                Role: Specialty doctor
                Role: Community staff nurse
                Role: Research lead
                Role: Dollar Health Centre
                Role: Consultant in palliative medicine
                Role: Head of policy and public affairs
                Role: Secretary
                Role: Primary care clinical lead in eHealth
                Role: Macmillan honorary reader in palliative care
                Role: Emeritus professor, primary palliative care research group
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                January 2020
                17 December 2019
                17 December 2019
                : 70
                : 690
                : e20-e28
                Affiliations
                Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh; honorary fellow, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
                St Columba’s Hospice, Edinburgh; specialty doctor, Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh.
                NHS Lothian, Edinburgh; research assistant, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
                Marie Curie Hospice, Glasgow.
                NHS Tayside, Dundee; national clinical lead for palliative care, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh.
                West End Medical Practice, Edinburgh.
                Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh.
                Marie Curie Scotland, Edinburgh.
                Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh.
                eHealth Division, Directorate for Health Finance, Corporate Governance and Value, Scottish Government, Edinburgh; GP Partner, East Linton Surgery, East Linton, East Lothian, Edinburgh.
                Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
                University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Anne M Finucane, Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh, EH10 7DR, UK. Email: Anne.Finucane@ 123456mariecurie.org.uk
                Article
                10.3399/bjgp19X707117
                6917358
                31848198
                e075fa78-e2ce-4881-94f0-feb7c959e052
                ©The Authors

                This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 June 2019
                : 18 July 2019
                : 09 August 2019
                Categories
                Research

                after-hours care,digital health,electronic palliative care coordination systems,general practice,palliative care,primary health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log