38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Analysis of the Influence of Cell Heterogeneity on Nanoparticle Dose Response

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding the effect of variability in the interaction of individual cells with nanoparticles on the overall response of the cell population to a nanoagent is a fundamental challenge in bionanotechnology. Here, we show that the technique of time-resolved, high-throughput microscopy can be used in this endeavor. Mass measurement with single-cell resolution provides statistically robust assessments of cell heterogeneity, while the addition of a temporal element allows assessment of separate processes leading to deconvolution of the effects of particle supply and biological response. We provide a specific demonstration of the approach, in vitro, through time-resolved measurement of fibroblast cell (HFF-1) death caused by exposure to cationic nanoparticles. The results show that heterogeneity in cell area is the major source of variability with area-dependent nanoparticle capture rates determining the time of cell death and hence the form of the exposure–response characteristic. Moreover, due to the particulate nature of the nanoparticle suspension, there is a reduction in the particle concentration over the course of the experiment, eventually causing saturation in the level of measured biological outcome. A generalized mathematical description of the system is proposed, based on a simple model of particle depletion from a finite supply reservoir. This captures the essential aspects of the nanoparticle–cell interaction dynamics and accurately predicts the population exposure–response curves from individual cell heterogeneity distributions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cationic polystyrene nanosphere toxicity depends on cell-specific endocytic and mitochondrial injury pathways.

          The exponential increase in the number of new nanomaterials that are being produced increases the likelihood of adverse biological effects in humans and the environment. In this study we compared the effects of cationic nanoparticles in five different cell lines that represent portal-of-entry or systemic cellular targets for engineered nanoparticles. Although 60 nm NH(2)-labeled polystyrene (PS) nanospheres were highly toxic in macrophage (RAW 264.7) and epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells, human microvascular endothelial (HMEC), hepatoma (HEPA-1), and pheochromocytoma (PC-12) cells were relatively resistant to particle injury. While the death pathway in RAW 264.7 cells involves caspase activation, the cytotoxic response in BEAS-2B cells is more necrotic in nature. Using fluorescent-labeled NH(2)-PS, we followed the routes of particle uptake. Confocal microscopy showed that the cationic particles entered a LAMP-1 positive lysosomal compartment in RAW 264.7 cells from where the particles could escape by lysosomal rupture. A proton pump inhibitor interfered in this pathway. Subsequent deposition of the particles in the cytosol induced an increase in mitochondrial Ca(2+) uptake and cell death that could be suppressed by cyclosporin A (CsA). In contrast, NH(2)-PS toxicity in BEAS-2B cells did not involve the LAMP-1 endosomal compartment, stimulation of proton pump activity, or an increase in mitochondrial Ca(2+). Particles were taken up by caveolae, and their toxicity could be disrupted by cholesterol extraction from the surface membrane. Although the particles induced mitochondrial damage and ATP depletion, CsA did not affect cytotoxicity. Cationic particles were taken up into HEPA-1, HMEC, and PC-12 cells, but this did not lead to lysosomal permeabilization, increased Ca(2+) flux, or mitochondrial damage. Taken together, the results of this study demonstrate the importance of cell-specific uptake mechanisms and pathways that could lead to sensitivity or resistance to cationic particle toxicity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments.

            The rapid growth in the use of in vitro methods for nanoparticle toxicity assessment has proceeded with limited consideration of the unique kinetics of these materials in solution. Particles in general and nanoparticles specifically, diffuse, settle, and agglomerate in cell culture media as a function of systemic and particle properties: media density and viscosity and particle size, shape, charge and density, for example. Cellular dose then is also a function of these factors as they determine the rate of transport of nanoparticles to cells in culture. Here we develop and apply the principles of dosimetry in vitro and outline an approach for simulation of nanoparticle particokinetics in cell culture systems. We illustrate that where equal mass concentrations (mug/ml) imply equal doses for dissimilar materials, the corresponding particle number or surface area concentration doses differ by orders of magnitude. More importantly, when rates of diffusional and gravitational particle delivery are accounted for, trends and magnitude of the cellular dose as a function of particle size and density differ significantly from those implied by "concentration" doses. For example, 15-nm silver nanoparticles appear approximately 4000 times more potent than micron-sized cadmium oxide particles on a cm(2)/ml media basis, but are only approximately 50 times more potent when differences in delivery to adherent cells are considered. We conclude that simple surrogates of dose can cause significant misinterpretation of response and uptake data for nanoparticles in vitro. Incorporating particokinetics and principles of dosimetry would significantly improve the basis for nanoparticle toxicity assessment, increasing the predictive power and scalability of such assays.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ISDD: A computational model of particle sedimentation, diffusion and target cell dosimetry for in vitro toxicity studies

              Background The difficulty of directly measuring cellular dose is a significant obstacle to application of target tissue dosimetry for nanoparticle and microparticle toxicity assessment, particularly for in vitro systems. As a consequence, the target tissue paradigm for dosimetry and hazard assessment of nanoparticles has largely been ignored in favor of using metrics of exposure (e.g. μg particle/mL culture medium, particle surface area/mL, particle number/mL). We have developed a computational model of solution particokinetics (sedimentation, diffusion) and dosimetry for non-interacting spherical particles and their agglomerates in monolayer cell culture systems. Particle transport to cells is calculated by simultaneous solution of Stokes Law (sedimentation) and the Stokes-Einstein equation (diffusion). Results The In vitro Sedimentation, Diffusion and Dosimetry model (ISDD) was tested against measured transport rates or cellular doses for multiple sizes of polystyrene spheres (20-1100 nm), 35 nm amorphous silica, and large agglomerates of 30 nm iron oxide particles. Overall, without adjusting any parameters, model predicted cellular doses were in close agreement with the experimental data, differing from as little as 5% to as much as three-fold, but in most cases approximately two-fold, within the limits of the accuracy of the measurement systems. Applying the model, we generalize the effects of particle size, particle density, agglomeration state and agglomerate characteristics on target cell dosimetry in vitro. Conclusions Our results confirm our hypothesis that for liquid-based in vitro systems, the dose-rates and target cell doses for all particles are not equal; they can vary significantly, in direct contrast to the assumption of dose-equivalency implicit in the use of mass-based media concentrations as metrics of exposure for dose-response assessment. The difference between equivalent nominal media concentration exposures on a μg/mL basis and target cell doses on a particle surface area or number basis can be as high as three to six orders of magnitude. As a consequence, in vitro hazard assessments utilizing mass-based exposure metrics have inherently high errors where particle number or surface areas target cells doses are believed to drive response. The gold standard for particle dosimetry for in vitro nanotoxicology studies should be direct experimental measurement of the cellular content of the studied particle. However, where such measurements are impractical, unfeasible, and before such measurements become common, particle dosimetry models such as ISDD provide a valuable, immediately useful alternative, and eventually, an adjunct to such measurements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACS Nano
                ACS Nano
                nn
                ancac3
                ACS Nano
                American Chemical Society
                1936-0851
                1936-086X
                13 June 2014
                22 July 2014
                : 8
                : 7
                : 6693-6700
                Affiliations
                []Centre for Nanohealth, College of Engineering and College of Medicine, Swansea University , Swansea SA2 8PP, U.K.
                []Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute , Houston, Texas 77030, United States
                [§ ]Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine , 6501 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas 77030, United States
                []Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, United States
                []Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, Boston, Massachusetts 02148, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to h.d.summers@ 123456swansea.ac.uk .
                Article
                10.1021/nn502356f
                4216222
                24923782
                e081cb1c-a62a-401e-ac0a-a8bfda7d58b1
                Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society

                Terms of Use CC-BY

                History
                : 10 January 2014
                : 12 June 2014
                Funding
                National Institutes of Health, United States
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                nn502356f
                nn-2014-02356f

                Nanotechnology
                nanomedicine,nanotoxicology,bionanotechnology,nanoparticle dose,nanoparticle exposure,dose−response characteristic,high-throughput microscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article