16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Tick-borne bacteria in Ixodes ricinus collected in southern Norway evaluated by a commercial kit and established real-time PCR protocols.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ticks are important vectors of human pathogens. The knowledge of disease causing agents harboured by ticks in Norway is limited. The focus of this study was (a) to detect the bacteria of medical importance in ticks collected from the vegetation at locations in the southern part of the country and (b) to evaluate a novel commercially available multiplex PCR based method by comparing results with conventional established real-time PCR protocols. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato was confirmed to be the most prevalent pathogen detected (31%) among one hundred individually analysed adult ticks. Borrelia miyamotoi, a spirochete associated with relapsing fever, was detected in one sample. Anaplasma phagocytophilum was found in 4% of the ticks, followed by Rickettsia helvetica which was detected in one sample. Similar pathogen prevalence was also detected in 500 ticks analysed in pools. This is the first report of the spotted fever group Rickettsia in Norway. Francisella tularensis, Bartonella species or Coxiella burnetti was not detected. However, due to the low number of ticks analysed, the possible presence of these pathogens in the region cannot be ruled out. All isolates were screened by at least two different molecular methods for each bacterial target; one commercially available multiplex PCR based tick-borne bacteria flow chip system (Master Diagnostica) and corresponding real-time PCR protocols. The comparison of methods verified that most findings were detected by both methods (71 Borrelia, 15 Anaplasma and 2 Rickettsia), whereas two additional Borrelia and Anaplasma infected samples were detected by the real-time protocols.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Ticks Tick Borne Dis
          Ticks and tick-borne diseases
          Elsevier BV
          1877-9603
          1877-959X
          Jun 2015
          : 6
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Sørlandet Hospital Health Enterprise, Department of Medical Microbiology, PO Box 416, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway. Electronic address: hanne.quarsten@sshf.no.
          [2 ] Sørlandet Hospital Health Enterprise, Department of Medical Microbiology, PO Box 416, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
          [3 ] University of Ljubljana, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zaloška 4, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
          [4 ] Sørlandet Hospital Health Enterprise, Research Unit, PO Box 416, NO-4604 Kristiansand, Norway; University of Agder, Department of Engineering and Science, Institute of Natural Sciences, Gimlemoen 25, NO-4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
          Article
          S1877-959X(15)00076-X
          10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.04.008
          25985721
          e0c9bafe-35af-4f74-a395-6f32626f9c29
          History

          Anaplasma phagocytophilum,Borrelia miyamotoi,Ixodes ricinus,Real-time PCR,Rickettsia helvetica,Tick-borne bacteria flow chip kit

          Comments

          Comment on this article