1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring subgroups of acceptance prediction for e-mental health among psychotherapists-in-training: a latent class analysis

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Theoretical background

          Research of E-Mental Health (EMH) interventions remains a much-studied topic, as does its acceptance in different professional groups as psychotherapists-in-training (PiT). Acceptance among clinicians may vary and depend on several factors, including the characteristics of different EMH services and applications. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate the factors that predict acceptance of EMH among a sample of PiT using a latent class analysis. The study will 1) determine how many acceptance prediction classes can be distinguished and 2) describe classes and differences between classes based on their characteristics.

          Methods

          A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional online survey was conducted. N = 216 PiT (88.4% female) participated. In the study, participants were asked to rate their acceptance of EMH, as operationalized by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, along with its predictors, perceived barriers, perceived advantages and additional facilitators. Indicator variables for the LCA were eight items measuring the UTAUT-predictors.

          Results

          Best model fit emerged for a two-class solution; the first class showed high levels on all UTAUT-predictors, the second class revealed moderate levels on the UTAUT-predictors.

          Conclusion

          This study was able to show that two classes of individuals can be identified based on the UTAUT-predictors. Differences between the classes regarding Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy were found. Interestingly, the two classes differed in theoretical orientation but not in age or gender. Latent class analysis could help to identify subgroups and possible starting points to foster acceptance of EMH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Latent Class Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice

              Latent class analysis (LCA) is a statistical procedure used to identify qualitatively different subgroups within populations who often share certain outward characteristics. The assumption underlying LCA is that membership in unobserved groups (or classes) can be explained by patterns of scores across survey questions, assessment indicators, or scales. The application of LCA is an active area of research and continues to evolve. As more researchers begin to apply the approach, detailed information on key considerations in conducting LCA is needed. In the present article, we describe LCA, review key elements to consider when conducting LCA, and provide an example of its application.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1663527Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2604943Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1663514Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                14 March 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1296449
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 University of Bern, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine , Bern, Switzerland
                [2] 2 Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [3] 3 University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [4] 4 University of Zurich, Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology with Focus on Psychotherapy Research , Zurich, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Silvia Simbula, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy

                Reviewed by: Sarah Liebherz, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

                Miriam Braga, University of Verona, Italy

                *Correspondence: Marie Drüge, Marie.Druege@ 123456psychologie.uzh.ch
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1296449
                10973105
                38550532
                e0cf8a8c-daea-4d6e-bacf-e92818dd0d4b
                Copyright © 2024 Staeck, Stüble and Drüge

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 September 2023
                : 27 February 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 8, Words: 3774
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Brief Research Report
                Custom metadata
                Digital Mental Health

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                e-mental health,utaut,psychotherapists-in-training,acceptance,latent class analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article