44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Repeated targeting of the same hosts by a brood parasite compromises host egg rejection

      research-article
      a , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , b , 1 , 2
      Nature Communications
      Nature Pub. Group

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cuckoo eggs famously mimic those of their foster parents to evade rejection from discriminating hosts. Here we test whether parasites benefit by repeatedly parasitizing the same host nest. This should make accurate rejection decisions harder, regardless of the mechanism that hosts use to identify foreign eggs. Here we find strong support for this prediction in the African tawny-flanked prinia ( Prinia subflava), the most common host of the cuckoo finch ( Anomalospiza imberbis). We show experimentally that hosts reject eggs that differ from an internal template, but crucially, as the proportion of foreign eggs increases, hosts are less likely to reject them and require greater differences in appearance to do so. Repeated parasitism by the same cuckoo finch female is common in host nests and likely to be an adaptation to increase the probability of host acceptance. Thus, repeated parasitism interacts with egg mimicry to exploit cognitive and sensory limitations in host defences.

          Abstract

          Cuckoo eggs mimic those of their hosts to evade rejection. Here, the authors demonstrate that African cuckoo finch females combine both mimicry and a strategy of repeatedly parasitizing the same host nests to increase success by creating uncertainty in host defenses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Model System for Coevolution: Avian Brood Parasitism

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit ( Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird ( Turdus merula L.)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs.

              One of the most striking outcomes of coevolution between species is egg mimicry by brood parasitic birds, resulting from rejection behavior by discriminating host parents. Yet, how exactly does a host detect a parasitic egg? Brood parasitism and egg rejection behavior provide a model system for exploring the relative importance of different visual cues used in a behavioral task. Although hosts are discriminating, we do not know exactly what cues they use, and to answer this it is crucial to account for the receiver's visual perception. Color, luminance ("perceived lightness") and pattern information have never been simultaneously quantified and experimentally tested through a bird's eye. The cuckoo finch Anomalospiza imberbis and its hosts show spectacular polymorphisms in egg appearance, providing a good opportunity for investigating visual discrimination owing to the large range of patterns and colors involved. Here we combine field experiments in Africa with modeling of avian color vision and pattern discrimination to identify the specific visual cues used by hosts in making rejection decisions. We found that disparity between host and foreign eggs in both color and several aspects of pattern (dispersion, principal marking size, and variability in marking size) were important predictors of rejection, especially color. These cues correspond exactly to the principal differences between host and parasitic eggs, showing that hosts use the most reliable available cues in making rejection decisions, and select for parasitic eggs that are increasingly mimetic in a range of visual attributes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Pub. Group
                2041-1723
                24 September 2013
                : 4
                : 2475
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
                [2 ]DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town , Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
                [3 ]Present address: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                ncomms3475
                10.1038/ncomms3475
                3791459
                24064931
                e0d9b761-8cb4-4254-88a1-866b3c8a000f
                Copyright © 2013, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

                History
                : 26 February 2013
                : 20 August 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article