62
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of TGFBI corneal dystrophy and molecular diagnostic testing

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To date, 70 different TGFBI mutations that cause epithelial-stromal corneal dystrophies have been described. At present one commercially available test examines for the five most common of these mutations: R124H, R124C, R124L, R555W, and R555Q. To expand the capability of identifying the causative mutation in the remaining cases, 57 mutations would need to be added. The aim of this study was to obtain a better understanding of the worldwide distribution and population differences of TGFBI mutations and to assess which mutations could be included or excluded from any potential assay. A total of 184 published papers in Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and PubMed from 34 countries worldwide reporting over 1600 corneal dystrophy cases were reviewed. Global data from 600,000 samples using the commercially available test were analyzed. Case studies by University College of London (UCL), Moorfield’s Corneal Dystrophy Study data and 19 samples from patients with clinical abnormality or uncertainty for which the current test detected no mutation were used to predict an achievable detection rate. Data from the literature search showed no difference in the spectrum and frequency of each mutation in different populations or geographical locations. According to our analysis, an increase to the worldwide detection rate in all populations from 75 to 90% could be achieved by the addition of six mutations—H626R, A546D, H572R, G623D, R124S, and M502V—to the currently available test and that may be beneficial for LASIK pre-screening worldwide.

          摘要

          到目前为止, 已经发现62种不同的TGFBI突变导致角膜上皮间质性营养不良。商业化的检测方法用来检测这些突变中最常见的5个突变位点:R124H、R124C、R124L、R555W和R555Q。为了扩大此基因在病例中识别致病突变的能力, 需要添加57个突变。本研究的目的是为了更好地了解TGFBI突变在世界范围内的分布和种群差异, 并评估哪些突变可以被纳入或排除在任何潜在的分析中。来自全球34个国家的184篇发表在人类基因突变数据库(HGMD)和PubMed上的论文报道了超过1600例角膜营养不良病例。研究人员分析了来自全球60万个样本的数据, 这些样本使用的是市面上可以买到的检测方法。来自伦敦大学学院(UCL)、Moorfield’s角膜营养不良的病例研究数据和目前检测未发现突变的19例临床异常或不确定的患者样本进行分析, 预测出可获得的检出率。文献检索的数据显示, 在不同种群或地理位置, 每个突变的频谱和频率没有差异。根据我们的分析, 在现有的检测方法基础上, 通过增加H626R、A546D、H572R、G623D、R124S和M502V六种突变, 可以将全球所有人群的检出率从75%提高到90%, 这将有利于全世界LASIK的预先筛分。

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases.

          Despite extensive knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases, many controversies still exist. For that reason, there is a need for current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of these conditions. This project aimed to reach consensus of ophthalmology experts from around the world regarding keratoconus and ectatic diseases, focusing on their definition, concepts, clinical management, and surgical treatments. The Delphi method was followed with 3 questionnaire rounds and was complemented with a face-to-face meeting. Thirty-six panelists were involved and allocated to 1 of 3 panels: definition/diagnosis, nonsurgical management, or surgical treatment. The level of agreement considered for consensus was two thirds. Numerous agreements were generated in definitions, methods of diagnosing, and management of keratoconus and other ectatic diseases. Nonsurgical and surgical treatments for these conditions, including the use of corneal cross-linking and corneal transplantations, were presented in a stepwise approach. A flowchart describing a logical management sequence for keratoconus was created. This project resulted in definitions, statements, and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of keratoconus and other ectatic diseases. It also provides an insight into the current worldwide treatment of these conditions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Corneal dystrophies

            The term corneal dystrophy embraces a heterogenous group of bilateral genetically determined non-inflammatory corneal diseases that are restricted to the cornea. The designation is imprecise but remains in vogue because of its clinical value. Clinically, the corneal dystrophies can be divided into three groups based on the sole or predominant anatomical location of the abnormalities. Some affect primarily the corneal epithelium and its basement membrane or Bowman layer and the superficial corneal stroma (anterior corneal dystrophies), the corneal stroma (stromal corneal dystrophies), or Descemet membrane and the corneal endothelium (posterior corneal dystrophies). Most corneal dystrophies have no systemic manifestations and present with variable shaped corneal opacities in a clear or cloudy cornea and they affect visual acuity to different degrees. Corneal dystrophies may have a simple autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked recessive Mendelian mode of inheritance. Different corneal dystrophies are caused by mutations in the CHST6, KRT3, KRT12, PIP5K3, SLC4A11, TACSTD2, TGFBI, and UBIAD1 genes. Knowledge about the responsible genetic mutations responsible for these disorders has led to a better understanding of their basic defect and to molecular tests for their precise diagnosis. Genes for other corneal dystrophies have been mapped to specific chromosomal loci, but have not yet been identified. As clinical manifestations widely vary with the different entities, corneal dystrophies should be suspected when corneal transparency is lost or corneal opacities occur spontaneously, particularly in both corneas, and especially in the presence of a positive family history or in the offspring of consanguineous parents. Main differential diagnoses include various causes of monoclonal gammopathy, lecithin-cholesterol-acyltransferase deficiency, Fabry disease, cystinosis, tyrosine transaminase deficiency, systemic lysosomal storage diseases (mucopolysaccharidoses, lipidoses, mucolipidoses), and several skin diseases (X-linked ichthyosis, keratosis follicularis spinolosa decalvans). The management of the corneal dystrophies varies with the specific disease. Some are treated medically or with methods that excise or ablate the abnormal corneal tissue, such as deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) and phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK). Other less debilitating or asymptomatic dystrophies do not warrant treatment. The prognosis varies from minimal effect on the vision to corneal blindness, with marked phenotypic variability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The IC3D classification of the corneal dystrophies.

              The recent availability of genetic analyses has demonstrated the shortcomings of the current phenotypic method of corneal dystrophy classification. Abnormalities in different genes can cause a single phenotype, whereas different defects in a single gene can cause different phenotypes. Some disorders termed corneal dystrophies do not appear to have a genetic basis. The purpose of this study was to develop a new classification system for corneal dystrophies, integrating up-to-date information on phenotypic description, pathologic examination, and genetic analysis. The International Committee for Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D) was created to devise a current and accurate nomenclature. This anatomic classification continues to organize dystrophies according to the level chiefly affected. Each dystrophy has a template summarizing genetic, clinical, and pathologic information. A category number from 1 through 4 is assigned, reflecting the level of evidence supporting the existence of a given dystrophy. The most defined dystrophies belong to category 1 (a well-defined corneal dystrophy in which a gene has been mapped and identified and specific mutations are known) and the least defined belong to category 4 (a suspected dystrophy where the clinical and genetic evidence is not yet convincing). The nomenclature may be updated over time as new information regarding the dystrophies becomes available. The IC3D Classification of Corneal Dystrophies is a new classification system that incorporates many aspects of the traditional definitions of corneal dystrophies with new genetic, clinical, and pathologic information. Standardized templates provide key information that includes a level of evidence for there being a corneal dystrophy. The system is user-friendly and upgradeable and can be retrieved on the website www.corneasociety.org/ic3d.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                a.nesbit@ulster.ac.uk
                Journal
                Eye (Lond)
                Eye (Lond)
                Eye
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0950-222X
                1476-5454
                13 February 2019
                13 February 2019
                June 2019
                : 33
                : 6
                : 874-881
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000105519715, GRID grid.12641.30, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, , University of Ulster, ; Coleraine, Northern Ireland UK
                [2 ]Avellino Lab USA, Inc., Menlo Park, CA USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Department of Ophthalmology, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.478136.f, Vance Thompson Vision, ; Sioux Falls, SD USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-9235
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5109-2388
                Article
                346
                10.1038/s41433-019-0346-x
                6707296
                30760895
                e0feb53c-e5fe-4562-b79d-8bf90f8128b2
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 April 2018
                : 10 December 2018
                : 29 December 2018
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2019

                Vision sciences
                mutation,corneal diseases
                Vision sciences
                mutation, corneal diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article