8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors Influencing the Detection of Spatially-Varying Surface Gloss

      research-article
      ,
      i-Perception
      SAGE Publications
      3D perception, gloss perception, object recognition, surfaces/materials

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, we investigate the ability of human observers to detect spatial inhomogeneities in the glossiness of a surface and how the performance in this task depends on several context factors. We used computer-generated stimuli showing a single object in three-dimensional space whose surface was split into two spatial areas with different microscale smoothness. The context factors were the kind of illumination, the object’s shape, the availability of motion information, the degree of edge blurring, the spatial proportions between the two areas of different smoothness, and the general smoothness level. Detection thresholds were determined using a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task implemented in a double random staircase procedure, where the subjects had to indicate for each stimulus whether or not the surface appears to have a spatially uniform material. We found evidence that two different cues are used for this task: luminance differences and differences in highlight properties between areas of different microscale smoothness. While the visual system seems to be highly sensitive in detecting gloss differences based on luminance contrast information, detection thresholds were considerably higher when the judgment was mainly based on differences in highlight features, such as their size, intensity, and sharpness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Visual perception of materials and their properties.

          Misidentifying materials-such as mistaking soap for pâté, or vice versa-could lead to some pretty messy mishaps. Fortunately, we rarely suffer such indignities, thanks largely to our outstanding ability to recognize materials-and identify their properties-by sight. In everyday life, we encounter an enormous variety of materials, which we usually distinguish effortlessly and without error. However, despite its subjective ease, material perception poses the visual system with some unique and significant challenges, because a given material can take on many different appearances depending on the lighting, viewpoint and shape. Here, I use observations from recent research on material perception to outline a general theory of material perception, in which I suggest that the visual system does not actually estimate physical parameters of materials and objects. Instead-I argue-the brain is remarkably adept at building 'statistical generative models' that capture the natural degrees of variation in appearance between samples. For example, when determining perceived glossiness, the brain does not estimate parameters of the BRDF. Instead, it uses a constellation of low- and mid-level image measurements to characterize the extent to which the surface manifests specular reflections. I argue that these 'statistical appearance models' are both more expressive and easier to compute than physical parameters, and therefore represent a powerful middle way between a 'bag of tricks' and 'inverse optics'. Copyright © 2013 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The perception and misperception of specular surface reflectance.

            The amount and spectral content of the light reflected by most natural surfaces depends on the structure of the light field, the observer's viewing position, and 3D surface geometry, particularly for specular (glossy) surfaces. A growing body of data has demonstrated that perceived surface gloss can vary as a function of its 3D shape and its illumination field, but there is currently no explanation for these effects. Here, we show that the perception of gloss can be understood as a direct consequence of image properties that covary with surface geometry and the illumination field. We show that different illumination fields can generate qualitatively different patterns of interaction between perceived gloss and 3D surface geometry. Despite the complexity and variability of these interactions, we demonstrate that the perception (and misperception) of gloss is well predicted by the way that each illumination field modulates the size, contrast, sharpness, and depth of specular reflections. Our results provide a coherent explanation of the effects of extrinsic scene variables on perceived gloss, and our methods suggest a general technique for assessing the role of specific image properties in modulating our visual experience of material properties. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perceptual qualities and material classes.

              Under typical viewing conditions, we can easily group materials into distinct classes (e.g., woods, plastics, textiles). Additionally, we can also make many other judgments about material properties (e.g., hardness, rigidity, colorfulness). Although these two types of judgment (classification and inferring material properties) have different requirements, they likely facilitate one another. We conducted two experiments to investigate the interactions between material classification and judgments of material qualities in both the visual and semantic domains. In Experiment 1, nine students viewed 130 images of materials from 10 different classes. For each image, they rated nine subjective properties (glossiness, transparency, colorfulness, roughness, hardness, coldness, fragility, naturalness, prettiness). In Experiment 2, 65 subjects were given the verbal names of six material classes, which they rated in terms of 42 adjectives describing material qualities. In both experiments, there was notable agreement between subjects, and a relatively small number of factors (weighted combinations of different qualities) were substantially independent of one another. Despite the difficulty of classifying materials from images (Liu, Sharan, Adelson, & Rosenholtz, 2010), the different classes were well clustered in the feature space defined by the subjective ratings. K-means clustering could correctly identify class membership for over 90% of the samples, based on the average ratings across subjects. We also found a high degree of consistency between the two tasks, suggesting subjects access similar information about materials whether judging their qualities visually or from memory. Together, these findings show that perceptual qualities are well defined, distinct, and systematically related to material class membership.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Iperception
                Iperception
                IPE
                spipe
                i-Perception
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2041-6695
                06 September 2019
                Sep-Oct 2019
                : 10
                : 5
                : 2041669519866843
                Affiliations
                [1-2041669519866843]Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Psychologie, Kiel, Germany
                Author notes
                [*]Franz Faul, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Psychologie, Olshausenstraße 62, Kiel D-24098, Germany. Email: ffaul@ 123456psychologie.uni-kiel.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-2920
                Article
                10.1177_2041669519866843
                10.1177/2041669519866843
                6732868
                e113292d-8400-488b-8163-f9570117494a
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 28 February 2019
                : 10 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, FundRef http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: FA 425/3-1
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                September-October 2019

                Neurosciences
                3d perception,gloss perception,object recognition,surfaces/materials
                Neurosciences
                3d perception, gloss perception, object recognition, surfaces/materials

                Comments

                Comment on this article