13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The clinical phenotype of pemphigus is defined by the anti-desmoglein autoantibody profile

      , , , ,
      Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Some patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) have mucous membrane erosions with minimal skin involvement (mucosal dominant type), and others show extensive skin blisters and erosions in addition to mucous membrane involvement (mucocutaneous type). Patients with pemphigus foliaceus (PF) show only skin involvement. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in autoantibody profile among mucosal dominant PV, mucocutaneous PV, and PF. Antibody titer against desmoglein 1 (Dsg 1) and desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant Dsg1 and Dsg3. Sera were obtained during clinically active disease from 24 patients with mucosal dominant PV, 20 with mucocutaneous PV, and 23 with PF. All sera samples from patients with mucosal dominant PV sera were negative against Dsgl but positive against Dsg3. All sera samples from those with mucocutaneous PV were positive against both Dsg1 and Dsg3. All sera samples from patients with PF were positive against Dsg1, but negative against Dsg3. Each subtype has its own anti-Dsg autoantibody profile, indicating that the clinical phenotype of pemphigus is defined by the autoantibody profile.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
          Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
          Elsevier BV
          01909622
          February 1999
          February 1999
          : 40
          : 2
          : 167-170
          Article
          10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70183-0
          10025740
          e144cbe2-a293-40d0-91f9-e056b70dd407
          © 1999

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article