Lower Body Mass Index and Prognostic Nutritional Index Are Associated with Poor Posttransplant Outcomes in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract

Introduction: Pretransplant inflammatory and nutritional status has not been widely explored in terms of its impact on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) outcomes in lymphoma patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) on auto-HSCT outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 87 consecutive lymphoma patients who underwent their first auto-HSCT at the Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit at Akdeniz University Hospital. Results: The CAR had no impact on posttransplant outcomes. PNI ≤50 was an independent prognostic factor for both shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, p = 0.025) and worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.93, p = 0.021), respectively. The 5-year PFS rate was significantly lower in patients with PNI ≤50 than in patients with PNI >50 (37.3% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.003). The 5-year OS rate in patients with PNI ≤50 was significantly low when compared with patients who had PNI >50 as well (45.5% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.011). Patients with BMI <25 had higher 100-day transplant-related mortality compared with patients with BMI ≥25 (14.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.020). BMI <25 was an independent prognostic factor associated with shorter PFS and OS (HR = 2.98 [ p = 0.003], HR = 5.06 [ p < 0.001], respectively). The 5-year PFS rate was significantly lower in patients with BMI <25 than patients with BMI ≥25 (40.2% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.037). Similarly, the 5-year OS rate in patients with BMI <25 was significantly inferior compared to patients with BMI ≥25 (42.7% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Our study confirms that lower BMI and CAR have negative impacts on auto-HSCT outcomes in lymphoma patients. Furthermore, higher BMI should not be considered an obstacle for lymphoma patients who need auto-HSCT; conversely, it could be an advantage for posttransplant outcomes.