16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A randomized trial to assess the utility of preintubation adult fiberoptic bronchoscope assessment in patients for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Confirmation of placement of Double lumen endobronchial tubes (DLETT) and bronchial blockers (BBs) with the pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) is the most preferred practice worldwide. Most centers possess standard adult FOBs, some, particularly in developing countries might not have access to the pediatric-sized devices. We have evaluated the role of preintubation airway assessment using the former, measuring the distance from the incisors to the carina and from carina to the left and right upper lobe bronchus in deciding the depth of insertion of the lung isolation device.

          Methods:

          The study was a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial consisting of 84 patients (all >18 years) undergoing thoracic surgery over a 12-month period. In the study group ( n = 38), measurements obtained during FOB with the adult bronchoscope decided the depth of insertion of the lung isolation device. In the control group ( n = 46), DLETTs and BBs were placed blindly followed by clinical confirmation by auscultation. Selection of the type and size of the lung isolation device was at the discretion of the anesthesiologist conducting the case. In all cases, pediatric FOB was used to confirm accurate placement of devices.

          Results:

          Of 84 patients (DLETT used in 76 patients; BB used in 8 patients), preintubation airway measurements significantly improved the success rate of optimal placement of lung isolation device from 25% (11/44) to 50% (18/36) ( P = 0.04). Our incidence of failed device placement at initial insertion was 4.7% (4/84). Incidence of malposition was 10% (8/80) with 4 cases in each group. The incidence of suboptimal placement was lower in the study group at 38.9% (14/36) versus 65.9% (29/44).

          Conclusions:

          Preintubation airway measurements with the adult FOB reduces airway manipulations and improves the success rate of optimal placement of DLETT and BB.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in conjunction with the use of double-lumen tubes for thoracic anesthesia: a prospective study.

          Fiberoptic bronchoscopy has been recommended to verify the position of double-lumen tubes (DLT), but this remains controversial. The authors studied the role of bronchoscopy for placing and monitoring right- and left-sided DLTs after blind intubation and after positioning the patient. Two hundred patients having thoracic surgery requiring DLT insertion were prospectively studied. "Blind" tracheal intubations were done with 163 left-sided and 37 right-sided disposable polyvinyl chloride Robertshaw tubes. Bronchoscopy was performed by a different anesthesiologist after intubation and conventional clinical verification of correct placement and after patient positioning for thoracotomy. A DLT was considered malpositioned when it had to be moved >0.5 cm to correct its position. Critical malpositions were those that might have affected patient safety or influenced the surgical procedure if left uncorrected. After "blind" DLT intubation, clinical evidence of malpositioning was found in 28 patients. This was confirmed by fiberoptic assessment. In 172 patients in whom placement was judged correct by clinical assessment, malpositioning was detected by bronchoscopy in 79 cases, 25 of which were critical. After patient positioning, DLTs were found to be displaced in 93 patients, 48 of which were critical. Right-sided DLTs were significantly more likely to be malpositioned than were left-sided DLTs. Two complications were related to unsatisfactory lung separation in the 200 patients studied. After blind intubation and patient positioning, more than one third of DLTs required repositioning. Routine bronchoscopy is therefore recommended after intubation and after patient positioning.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is flexible bronchoscopy necessary to confirm the position of double-lumen tubes before thoracic surgery?

            Flexible bronchoscopy is recommended to confirm correct placement of double-lumen tubes used for thoracic anesthesia. However, there is still controversy over routine bronchoscopic confirmation of their position. This study aimed to verify the usefulness of flexible bronchoscopy for confirming the position of double-lumen tubes after blind intubation. During a 9-month period, consecutive patients undergoing elective oncologic thoracic surgery were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients were intubated with a left disposable polyvinyl chloride double-lumen tube. Immediately after intubation, clinical verification was made by the anesthesiologist. Then, the endoscopist performed flexible bronchoscopy with a 2.8-mm diameter Olympus(®) video bronchoscope, and verified the position of the double-lumen tube, before positioning the patient. The double-lumen tube was in optimal position, if the bronchial cuff was immediately below the tracheal carina, and there was a clear view of the left subcarina, with unobstructed left upper and lower bronchi. Misplacement of the double-lumen tube was diagnosed when the tube had to be moved (in or out) for more than 0.5 cm to correct its position. Critical malposition meant a double-lumen tube dislocated in the trachea or in the right bronchi, requiring immediate re-intubation under bronchoscopic guidance. A total of 144 patients (44 women (42%) and 60 men (58%), with a mean age of 51 years (range 25-77 years)) were enrolled in the study. Surgical procedures included 37 right-sided and 31 left-sided thoracotomies, 22 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATSs) (16 right-sided and six left-sided), one median sternotomy, six mediastinotomies, and seven miscellaneous procedures. In 66 (63%, 95% confidence interval 53.2-71.8%) cases, there was complete agreement between the anesthesiologist and the endoscopist. The latter diagnosed misplacement of the double-lumen tube in 33 (32%, 95% confidence interval 22.8-40.7%) patients and critical malposition in five (5%, 95% confidence interval 0.7-8.9%) cases. After blind intubation, 37% of double-lumen tubes required repositioning by means of flexible bronchoscopy, despite positive evaluation made by the anesthesiologist. Our data suggests that initial bronchoscopic assessment should be made with the patient still in the supine position, and confirms that flexible bronchoscopy is useful in verifying the correct position of double-lumen tubes or adjusting possible misplacements, before starting thoracic surgery. Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Double lumen tube location predicts tube malposition and hypoxaemia during one lung ventilation.

              Poor positioning of an endobronchial double lumen tube (DLT) could affect oxygenation during one lung ventilation (OLV). We set out to relate DLT position to hypoxaemia and DLT misplacement during OLV. We recruited 152 ASA physical status I-II patients about to have elective thoracic surgery. The trachea was intubated with a left-sided DLT. Tube position was assessed by fibre-optic scope and correction was made after patient positioning and during OLV. If Pa(O(2)) was less than 10.7 kPa, the DLT position was checked and then PEEP, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), oxygen insufflation, or two lung ventilation (TLV) were tried. The DLT was found to be misplaced in 49 patients (32%) after patient positioning, and in 38 patients (25%) during OLV. PEEP to the dependent lung, CPAP or apneic oxygen insufflation to the non-dependent lung, or brief periods of TLV, were applied in 46 patients (30%). Patients who had DLT malposition after placing the patient in the lateral position had a greater incidence of DLT malposition during OLV (59 vs 9%) and also required each intervention more frequently (57 vs 10%). Patients with DLT malposition during OLV also required interventions more often (84 vs 12%). Patients who have DLT malposition after placing the patient in the lateral position had more DLT malposition during OLV and hypoxaemia during OLV.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Card Anaesth
                Ann Card Anaesth
                ACA
                Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0971-9784
                0974-5181
                Apr-Jun 2016
                : 19
                : 2
                : 251-255
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anesthesiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                [1 ]Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                [2 ]Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                [3 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Nayana Amin, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, Department of Anesthesiology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: drnayana.amin@ 123456yahoo.in
                Article
                ACA-19-251
                10.4103/0971-9784.179614
                4900363
                27052065
                e172b046-3e98-472b-ab4a-ed51bd3929b9
                Copyright: © 2016 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 16 December 2015
                : 03 March 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                airway assessment,bronchial blocker,double-lumen tubes,fiberoptic bronchoscope,one-lung ventilation,thoracic surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article