11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing homes: A mixed-methods systematic review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Most people with dementia transition into nursing homes as their disease progresses. Their family caregivers often continue to be involved in their relative’s care and experience high level of strain at the end of life.

          Aim:

          To gather and synthesize information on interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing homes and provide a set of recommendations for practice.

          Design:

          Mixed-Methods Systematic Review (PROSPERO no. CRD42020217854) with convergent integrated approach.

          Data sources:

          Five electronic databases were searched from inception in November 2020. Published qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies of interventions to support family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life in nursing home were included. No language or temporal limits were applied.

          Results:

          In all, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis resulted in three integrated findings: (i) healthcare professionals should engage family caregivers in ongoing dialog and provide adequate time and space for sensitive discussions; (ii) end-of-life discussions should be face-to-face and supported by written information whose timing of supply may vary according to family caregivers’ preferences and the organizational policies and cultural context; and (iii) family caregivers should be provided structured psychoeducational programs tailored to their specific needs and/or regular family meetings about dementia care at the end of life.

          Conclusion:

          The findings provide useful information on which interventions may benefit family caregivers of people with advanced dementia at the end of life and where, when, and how they should be provided.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.

            There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

              The evidence base on the prevalence of dementia is expanding rapidly, particularly in countries with low and middle incomes. A reappraisal of global prevalence and numbers is due, given the significant implications for social and public policy and planning. In this study we provide a systematic review of the global literature on the prevalence of dementia (1980-2009) and metaanalysis to estimate the prevalence and numbers of those affected, aged ≥60 years in 21 Global Burden of Disease regions. Age-standardized prevalence for those aged ≥60 years varied in a narrow band, 5%-7% in most world regions, with a higher prevalence in Latin America (8.5%), and a distinctively lower prevalence in the four sub-Saharan African regions (2%-4%). It was estimated that 35.6 million people lived with dementia worldwide in 2010, with numbers expected to almost double every 20 years, to 65.7 million in 2030 and 115.4 million in 2050. In 2010, 58% of all people with dementia lived in countries with low or middle incomes, with this proportion anticipated to rise to 63% in 2030 and 71% in 2050. The detailed estimates in this study constitute the best current basis for policymaking, planning, and allocation of health and welfare resources in dementia care. The age-specific prevalence of dementia varies little between world regions, and may converge further. Future projections of numbers of people with dementia may be modified substantially by preventive interventions (lowering incidence), improvements in treatment and care (prolonging survival), and disease-modifying interventions (preventing or slowing progression). All countries need to commission nationally representative surveys that are repeated regularly to monitor trends. Copyright © 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Palliative Medicine
                Palliat Med
                SAGE Publications
                0269-2163
                1477-030X
                February 2022
                December 30 2021
                February 2022
                : 36
                : 2
                : 268-291
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
                [2 ]Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
                [3 ]School of Nursing & Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
                [4 ]Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
                [6 ]School of Nursing, Azienda Ospedaliera “SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo,” Alessandria, Italy
                [7 ]Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
                Article
                10.1177/02692163211066733
                34965759
                e19ab20b-c5a3-4dfa-9d53-894c4b8ffb19
                © 2022

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article