47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives/Hypothesis

          To evaluate the safety and efficacy of acoustic and electric sound processing for individuals with significant residual low‐frequency hearing and severe‐to‐profound high‐frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

          Study Design

          Prospective, single‐arm repeated measures, single‐subject design.

          Methods

          Fifty individuals, ≥ 18 years old, with low‐frequency hearing and severe high‐frequency loss were implanted with the Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid L24 implant at 10 investigational sites. Preoperatively, subjects demonstrated consonant‐nucleus‐consonant word scores of 10% through 60% in the ear to be implanted. Subjects were assessed prospectively, preoperatively, and postoperatively on coprimary endpoints of consonant‐nucleus‐consonant words, AzBio sentences in noise, and self‐assessment measures.

          Results

          Significant mean improvements were observed for coprimary endpoints: consonant‐nucleus‐consonant words (35.8 percentage points) and AzBio sentences in noise (32.0 percentage points), both at P < 0.001. Ninety‐six percent of subjects performed equal or better on speech in quiet and 90% in noise. Eighty‐two percent of subjects showed improved performance on speech in quiet and 74% in noise. Self‐assessments were positive, corroborating speech perception results.

          Conclusion

          The Nucleus Hybrid System provides significant improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and noise for individuals with severe high‐frequency loss and some low‐frequency hearing. This device expands indications to hearing‐impaired individuals who perform poorly with amplification due to bilateral high‐frequency hearing loss and who previously were not implant candidates.

          Level of Evidence

          2b. Laryngoscope, 126:175–181, 2016

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.

            The goal of this study was to create and validate a new set of sentence lists that could be used to evaluate the speech perception abilities of hearing-impaired listeners and cochlear implant (CI) users. Our intention was to generate a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty for the evaluation of performance over time and across conditions. The AzBio sentence corpus includes 1000 sentences recorded from two female and two male talkers. The mean intelligibility of each sentence was estimated by processing each sentence through a five-channel CI simulation and calculating the mean percent correct score achieved by 15 normal-hearing listeners. Sentences from each talker were sorted by percent correct score, and 165 sentences were selected from each talker and were then sequentially assigned to 33 lists, each containing 20 sentences (5 sentences from each talker). List equivalency was validated by presenting all lists, in random order, to 15 CI users. Using sentence scores from the CI simulation study produced 33 lists of sentences with a mean score of 85% correct. The results of the validation study with CI users revealed no significant differences in percent correct scores for 29 of the 33 sentence lists. However, individual listeners demonstrated considerable variability in performance on the 29 lists. The binomial distribution model was used to account for the inherent variability observed in the lists. This model was also used to generate 95% confidence intervals for one and two list comparisons. A retrospective analysis of 172 instances where research subjects had been tested on two lists within a single condition revealed that 94% of results were accurately contained within these confidence intervals. The use of a five-channel CI simulation to estimate the intelligibility of individual sentences allowed for the creation of a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty. The results of the validation procedure with CI users found that 29 of 33 lists allowed scores that were not statistically different. However, individual listeners demonstrated considerable variability in performance across lists. This variability was accurately described by the binomial distribution model and was used to estimate the magnitude of change required to achieve statistical significance when comparing scores from one and two lists per condition. Fifteen sentence lists have been included in the AzBio Sentence Test for use in the clinical evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners and CI users. An additional eight sentence lists have been included in the Minimum Speech Test Battery to be distributed by the CI manufacturers for the evaluation of CI candidates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

              This study documents the importance of preserving residual low-frequency acoustic hearing as those with more residual hearing are selected for cochlear implantation. Surgical strategies used for hearing preservation with a short hybrid cochlear implant are outlined. The benefits of preserved residual low-frequency hearing, improved word understanding in noise, and music appreciation are described. Multicenter, prospective, single-subject design. Records were reviewed of 21 individuals participating in an Food and Drug Administration (FDA) feasibility clinical trial who have received an Iowa/Nucleus 10 mm electrode. A second group of subjects receiving implants at the University of Iowa that have used the 10 mm device between 2 years and 6 months were also reviewed. Outcome measures included standardized tests of monosyllabic word understanding, spondees in noise, and common melody recognition. Low-frequency hearing was maintained in all individuals immediately postoperative. One subject lost hearing at 2.5 months postoperative after a viral infection. The group has averaged a loss of -9 dB low-frequency acoustic hearing between 125 and 1,000 Hz. Monosyllabic word understanding scores at 6 months for a group being followed for an FDA clinical trial using the implant plus hearing aids was 69% correct. For the long-term group receiving implants at Iowa, monosyllabic word understanding in those who have used the device between 6 months and 2 years is 79%. Other important findings include improved recognition of speech in noise (9 dB improvement) as compared with standard cochlear implant recipients who were matched for speech recognition in quiet and near normal recognition of common melodies. The surgical strategies outlined have been successful in preservation of low-frequency hearing in 96% of individuals. Combined electrical and acoustical speech processing has enabled this group of volunteers to gain improved word understanding as compared with their preoperative hearing with bilateral hearing aids and a group of individuals receiving a standard cochlear implant with similar experience with their device. The improvement of speech in noise and melody recognition is attributed to the ability to distinguish fine pitch differences as the result of preserved residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing is important for improving speech in noise and music appreciation for the hearing impaired, both of which are important in real-life situations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Laryngoscope
                Laryngoscope
                10.1002/(ISSN)1531-4995
                LARY
                The Laryngoscope
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0023-852X
                1531-4995
                07 July 2015
                January 2016
                : 126
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/lary.v126.1 )
                : 175-181
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryNew York University New York New York
                [ 2 ] Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Iowa Iowa City Iowa
                [ 3 ]University of Washington Medical Center Seattle WashingtonU.S.A.
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Send correspondence to J. Thomas Roland Jr, M.D., Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, New York University, 550 First Ave, Suite 7Q, New York, NY 10016. E‐mail: john.roland@ 123456nyumc.org
                Article
                LARY25451
                10.1002/lary.25451
                4704985
                26152811
                e1d378c9-fa51-489a-af6d-86d4a7728b50
                Laryngoscope published by Wiley on behalf of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc, “The Triological Society” and American Laryngological Association (the “Owner”)

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 08 January 2015
                : 30 April 2015
                : 28 May 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Categories
                Otology/Neurotology
                Otology/Neurotology
                Original Reports
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                lary25451
                January 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.7.6 mode:remove_FC converted:18.02.2016

                Otolaryngology
                cochlear implant,hybrid cochlear implant,hearing preservation,electric‐acoustic stimulation,hearing in noise,bimodal stimulation

                Comments

                Comment on this article