40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Hyperlipidemia: A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background. Weight loss and reduction in comorbidities can be achieved by longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Existing evidence suggests that LSG resolves or improves hyperlipidemia in morbidly obese patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effect of LSG on hyperlipidemia. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted from English-language studies published from 2000 to 2012 for the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Clinical evidence, Scopus, Dara, Web of Sciences, TRIP, Health Technology Database, Cochrane library, and PsycINFO. Results. A total of 4,211 articles were identified in the initial search, and 4,185 articles were excluded based on the exclusion criteria. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review, involving 3,591 patients. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 48 ± 7.0 kg/m 2 (range 37.2–65.3). The mean postoperative BMI was 35 ± 5.9 kg/m 2 (range 26.3–49). The mean percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) was 63.1% (range 37.7–84.5), with a mean followup of 19.1 months (range 6–60). The mean levels of pre and post operative cholesterol were 194.4 ± 12.3 mg/dL (range 178–213) and 181 ± 16.3 mg/dL (range 158–200), respectively. Conclusion. Most patients with hyperlipidemia showed improvement or resolution of lipid profiles after LSG. Based on this systematic review, LSG has a significant effect on hyperlipidemia in the form of resolution or improvement in the majority of patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Metabolic and body composition factors in subgroups of obesity: what do we know?

            Obesity is thought to be a heterogeneous disorder with several possible etiologies; therefore, by examining subtypes of obesity we attempt to understand obesity's heterogeneous nature. The purpose of this review was to investigate the roles of metabolic, body composition, and cardiovascular disease risk in subtypes of obesity. We briefly consider two subtypes of obesity that have been identified in the literature. One subset of individuals, termed the metabolically healthy, but obese (MHO), despite having large amounts of fat mass compared with at risk obese individuals shows a normal metabolic profile, but remarkably normal to high levels of insulin sensitivity. Preliminary evidence suggests that this could be due at least in part to lower visceral fat levels and earlier onset of obesity. A second subset, termed the metabolically obese, but normal weight (MONW), present with normal body mass index, but have significant risk factors for diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease, which could be due to higher fat mass and plasma triglycerides as well as higher visceral fat and liver content. We also briefly consider the potential role of adipose and gastrointestinal hormonal profiles in MHO and MONW individuals, which could lead to a better understanding of potential factors that may regulate their body composition. This information will eventually be invaluable in helping us understand factors that predispose to or protect obese individuals from metabolic and cardiovascular disease. Collectively, a greater understanding of the MHO and MONW individual has important implications for therapeutic decision making, the characterization of subjects in research protocols, and medical education.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass.

              To assess the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as compared to the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and the open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ORYGB) for the treatment of obesity and obesity-related diseases. LSG is a newer procedure being done with increasing frequency. However, limited data are currently available comparing LSG to the other established procedures. We present the first prospective, multiinstitutional, nationwide, clinically rich, bariatric-specific data comparing sleeve gastrectomy to the adjustable gastric band, and the gastric bypass. This is the initial report analyzing data from the American College of Surgeons-Bariatric Surgery Center Network accreditation program, and its prospective, longitudinal, data collection system based on standardized definitions and collected by trained data reviewers. Univariate and multivariate analyses compare 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year outcomes including morbidity and mortality, readmissions, and reoperations as well as reduction in body mass index (BMI) and weight-related comorbidities. One hundred nine hospitals submitted data for 28,616 patients, from July, 2007 to September, 2010. The LSG has higher risk-adjusted morbidity, readmission and reoperation/intervention rates compared to the LAGB, but lower reoperation/intervention rates compared to the LRYGB and ORYGB. There were no differences in mortality. Reduction in BMI and most of the weight-related comorbidities after the LSG also lies between those of the LAGB and the LRYGB/ORYGB. LSG has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the LAGB and the LRYGB/ORYGB for data up to 1 year. As obesity is a lifelong disease, longer term comparative effectiveness data are most critical, and are yet to be determined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Obes
                J Obes
                JOBES
                Journal of Obesity
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-0708
                2090-0716
                2013
                27 October 2013
                : 2013
                : 643530
                Affiliations
                1Department of General Surgery, Bahrain Defense Force Hospital, Off Waly Alahed Avenue, P.O. Box 28743, West Riffa, Bahrain
                2Medical Education and Research Unit, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: B. J. Ammori

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7229-2960
                Article
                10.1155/2013/643530
                3826329
                24286009
                e20b99b6-ed2e-4acc-9983-83d9cf150c03
                Copyright © 2013 Khalid Al Khalifa et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 9 July 2013
                : 5 September 2013
                : 5 September 2013
                Categories
                Review Article

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                Nutrition & Dietetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article