2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Friendly fire? Negative campaigning among coalition partners

      1 , 2
      Research & Politics
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In democracies with multi-party competition, government parties face a dual challenge in election campaigns: on the one hand, they have to compete against and criticize their coalition partners. On the other hand, they should avoid virulent attacks on their partners to preserve their chances of future collaboration in government. Going beyond a dichotomous operationalization of negative campaigning, this manuscript analyses the tonality and volume of negative campaigning. Studying 3030 party press releases in four national Austrian election campaigns, different patterns for the tonality and frequency of negative campaigning reflect the electoral dilemma of government parties. Coalition parties criticize each other abundantly but refrain from ‘burning bridges’ with their partners through virulent attacks. These findings have implications for studying negative campaigning and coalition politics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            In Defense of Negativity

            John Geer (2006)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation

              Does negative campaigning influence the likelihood of voting in elections? Our study of U.S. Senate campaigns indicates the answer is “yes.” We find that people distinguish between useful negative information presented in an appropriate manner and irrelevant and harsh mudslinging. As the proportion of legitimate criticisms increases in campaigns, citizens becomemorelikely to cast ballots. When campaigns degenerate into unsubstantiated and shrill attacks, voters tend to stay home. Finally, we find that individuals vary in their sensitivity to the tenor of campaigns. In particular, the tone is more consequential for independents, for those with less interest in politics, and for those with less knowledge about politics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Research & Politics
                Research & Politics
                SAGE Publications
                2053-1680
                2053-1680
                September 11 2018
                July 2018
                September 11 2018
                July 2018
                : 5
                : 3
                : 205316801879691
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Government, University of Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]Department of Political Science, University of Innsbruck, Austria
                Article
                10.1177/2053168018796911
                e20c530c-5234-4081-a601-7c3a7b5c0381
                © 2018

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article