2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Modular dual-mobility articulations in patients with adverse spinopelvic mobility

      1 , 1 , 1 , 2
      The Bone & Joint Journal
      British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Adverse spinal motion or balance (spine mobility) and adverse pelvic mobility, in combination, are often referred to as adverse spinopelvic mobility (SPM). A stiff lumbar spine, large posterior standing pelvic tilt, and severe sagittal spinal deformity have been identified as risk factors for increased hip instability. Adverse SPM can create functional malposition of the acetabular components and hence is an instability risk. Adverse pelvic mobility is often, but not always, associated with abnormal spinal motion parameters. Dislocation rates for dual-mobility articulations (DMAs) have been reported to be between 0% and 1.1%. The aim of this study was to determine the early survivorship from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) of patients with adverse SPM who received a DMA.

          Methods

          A multicentre study was performed using data from 227 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), enrolled consecutively. All the patients who had one or more adverse spine or pelvic mobility parameter had a DMA inserted at the time of their surgery. The mean age was 76 years (22 to 93) and 63% were female (n = 145). At a mean of 14 months (5 to 31) postoperatively, the AOANJRR was analyzed for follow-up information. Reasons for revision and types of revision were identified.

          Results

          The AOANJRR reported two revisions: one due to infection, and the second due to femoral component loosening. No revisions for dislocation were reported. One patient died with the prosthesis in situ. Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 99.1% (95% confidence interval 98.3 to 100) at 14 months (number at risk 104).

          Conclusion

          In our cohort of patients undergoing primary THA with one or more factor associated with adverse SPM, DM bearings conferred stability at two years’ follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):820–825.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          The Bone & Joint Journal
          The Bone & Joint Journal
          British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
          2049-4394
          2049-4408
          July 01 2022
          July 01 2022
          : 104-B
          : 7
          : 820-825
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia
          [2 ] Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
          Article
          10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1628.R1
          35775170
          e20d6559-52cc-43bb-a9fd-e6dd9065486f
          © 2022

          https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDM

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article