52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative study of online mental health information seeking behaviour by those with psychosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Internet and mobile technology are changing the way people learn about and manage their illnesses. Little is known about online mental health information seeking behaviour by people with psychosis. This paper explores the nature, extent and consequences of online mental health information seeking behaviour by people with psychosis and investigates the acceptability of a mobile mental health application (app).

          Methods

          Semi-structured interviews were carried out with people with psychosis ( n = 22). Participants were purposively recruited through secondary care settings in London. The main topics discussed were participants’ current and historical use of online mental health information and technology. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed by a team of researchers using thematic analysis.

          Results

          Mental health related Internet use was widespread. Eighteen people described searching the Internet to help them make sense of their psychotic experiences, and to read more information about their diagnosis, their prescribed psychiatric medication and its side-effects. Whilst some participants sought ‘expert’ online information from mental health clinicians and research journals, others described actively seeking first person perspectives. Eight participants used this information collaboratively with clinicians and spoke of the empowerment and independence the Internet offered them. However nine participants did not discuss their use of online mental health information with their clinicians for a number of reasons, including fear of undermining their clinician’s authority. For some of these people concerns over what they had read led them to discontinue their antipsychotic medication without discussion with their mental health team.

          Conclusions

          People with psychosis use the Internet to acquire mental health related information. This can be a helpful source of supplementary information particularly for those who use it collaboratively with clinicians. When this information is not shared with their mental health team, it can affect patients’ health care decisions. A partnership approach to online health-information seeking is needed, with mental health clinicians encouraging patients to discuss information they have found online as part of a shared decision-making process. Our research suggests that those with psychosis have active digital lives and that the introduction of a mental health app into services would potentially be well received.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0952-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review.

            The Internet has become a favored source to find health information. Worldwide, about 4.5% of all Internet searches are for health-related information. However, research has found that the quality of online health information is mixed, which raises serious concerns about the impact of this information. This paper reviews relevant research to understand how health information on the Internet is retrieved, evaluated, and used. Most users of online health information are looking for information about specific health conditions because they or someone they know was diagnosed with a medical condition. They typically use general search engines to find online health information and enter short phrases, often misspelled. They seldom go beyond the first page of a search. Both their search and evaluation skills are limited although they are concerned about the quality of online health information. They avoid sites with overt commercialism, but often do not pay attention to indicators of credibility. Online health information is used to fill an information void which can enhance coping and self efficacy, affects health-related decisions and behavior of users and their friends and family, and is often discussed with health care providers. There are cross-cultural differences in the types of sites used as well as how online information is used. Based on the research reviewed in this paper, three major recommendations are suggested. Professionals should recommend sites. Professionals should promote more effective search and evaluation techniques. Professionals should be involved in developing and promoting uniform standards for health and mental health sites.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mobile technologies among people with serious mental illness: opportunities for future services.

              Several national bodies have proposed using mobile technology to improve mental health services. But rates of current use and interest in using technology to enhance services among individuals with serious mental illness are uncertain. The authors surveyed 1,592 individuals with serious mental illness regarding their use of mobile devices and interest in using mobile technologies to enhance mental health services. Seventy-two percent of survey respondents reported currently owning a mobile device, a rate approximately 12 % lower than the general adult population. The most common uses were for talking, followed by texting, and internet activities. Both mobile device users and nonusers expressed interest in future mobile services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                g.aref@ucl.ac.uk
                p.hanlon@ucl.ac.uk
                k.fullarton@ucl.ac.uk
                nm432@cam.ac.uk
                a.sommerlad@ucl.ac.uk
                s.johnson@ucl.ac.uk
                d.osborn@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                11 July 2016
                11 July 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 232
                Affiliations
                [ ]Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF UK
                [ ]Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4th Floor, East Wing, St Pancras Hospital, 4 Saint Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE UK
                Article
                952
                10.1186/s12888-016-0952-0
                4940927
                27400874
                e24f81e9-b44a-412a-9207-73a4e766443c
                © Aref-Adib et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 May 2015
                : 20 June 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                psychosis,severe mental illness,online,internet,health information,digital technology

                Comments

                Comment on this article